BibTex Citation Data :
@article{geoplanning25894, author = {Oluibukun Ajayi and Mark Palmer}, title = {Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions}, journal = {Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, year = {2020}, keywords = {Unmanned Aerial Vehicle; LiDAR technology;Digital Elevation Model;Terrain Modelling;Lidar;UAV}, abstract = { This study presents the effect of image data sources on the topographic modelling of part of the National Trust site located at Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, United Kingdom, covering an approximate area of 1.82 hectares. The accuracy of the DEM generated from 1m resolution and 2m resolution LiDAR data together with the accuracy of the DEM generated from the UAV images acquired at different altitudes are analysed using the 1 m LiDAR DEM as reference for the accuracy assessment. Using the NSSDA methodology, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the DEMs generated from each of the four sources were computed while the paired sample t-test was conducted to ascertain the existence of statistically significant difference between the means of the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the check points. The result obtained shows that with a RMSE of -0.0101499 and horizontal accuracy of -0.175674686m, the planimetric coordinates extracted from 2 m LiDAR DEM were more accurate than the planimetric coordinates extracted from the UAV based DEMs while the UAV based DEMs proved to be more accurate than the 2m LiDAR DEM in terms of altimetric coordinates, though the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 50 m altitude gave the most accurate result when compared with the vertical accuracy obtained from the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 30 m and 70 m flight heights. These findings are also consistent with the result of the statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval. }, issn = {2355-6544}, pages = {122--138} doi = {10.14710/geoplanning.6.2.122-138}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/geoplanning/article/view/25894} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This study presents the effect of image data sources on the topographic modelling of part of the National Trust site located at Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, United Kingdom, covering an approximate area of 1.82 hectares. The accuracy of the DEM generated from 1m resolution and 2m resolution LiDAR data together with the accuracy of the DEM generated from the UAV images acquired at different altitudes are analysed using the 1 m LiDAR DEM as reference for the accuracy assessment. Using the NSSDA methodology, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the DEMs generated from each of the four sources were computed while the paired sample t-test was conducted to ascertain the existence of statistically significant difference between the means of the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the check points. The result obtained shows that with a RMSE of -0.0101499 and horizontal accuracy of -0.175674686m, the planimetric coordinates extracted from 2 m LiDAR DEM were more accurate than the planimetric coordinates extracted from the UAV based DEMs while the UAV based DEMs proved to be more accurate than the 2m LiDAR DEM in terms of altimetric coordinates, though the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 50 m altitude gave the most accurate result when compared with the vertical accuracy obtained from the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 30 m and 70 m flight heights. These findings are also consistent with the result of the statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Flood Affected Building Footprints 3D Model from LiDAR and Aerial Photogrammetry (Case Study: Pandugo Street, Surabaya)
Assessment of generative adversarial networks for cloud occlusion removal on remotely sensed images
Advanced GIScience in Hydro-Geological Hazards
Development of a UAV-based system for the semi-automatic estimation of the volume of earthworks
Last update: 2026-01-17 21:17:32
Start from Volume 11 Number 2 2024, authors who publish in the Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning retain full copyright ownership (Copyright@Author) of their work. In keeping with the journal’s commitment to open access, all articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).Before Volume 11 Number 2 2024, copyright was still owned by the publisher, Universitas Diponegoro. To support a better open access program, we have created a new policy so that authors have full copyright ownership.
Readers and third parties may also use the content in accordance with the CC BY-NC-SA license. This includes the ability to reproduce, modify, and build upon the article, as long as proper attribution is given, and any resulting work is distributed under the same license.