DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.8.2.85-98

Trends in The Adoption of New Geospatial Technologies for Spatial Planning and Land Management in 2021

*Walter Timo de Vries orcid scopus publons  -  Twente University (2014), Technical University of Munich (2014-now), Germany

Citation Format:
Abstract

Changes in spatial planning and land management practices, regulations and operations have frequently relied on the uptake of innovations in geospatial technologies. This article reviews which ones the spatial planning and land management domains has effectively adopted and which new ones might potentially disrupt the domain in the near future of 2021 and beyond. Based on an extensive concept-centric trends synthesis and meta-review, the analysis demonstrates that whilst geospatial technologies are clearly gaining wider societal recognition and while private companies are indeed developing promising applications, its adoption in office work of public officials and public decision makers remains almost as limited as before. The potentially most disruptive technologies for the domain are however BIM, Block chain and Machine learning.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Geospatial technologies; Spatial planning; Land Management
Funding: none

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research
Language : EN
Recent articles
The Spatial Model of Paddy Productivity Based on Environmental Vulnerability in Each Phase of Paddy Planting Development of Desertification Indicators for Desertification Monitoring from Landsat Images Using Python Programming Monitoring Dynamics of Vegetation Cover with the Integration of OBIA and Random Forest Classifier Using Sentinel-2 Multitemporal Satellite Imagery More recent articles
Most cited articles
GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND FACTOR EFFECT ANALYSIS BY CERTAINTY FACTOR IN UPSTREAM OF JENEBERANG RIVER, INDONESIA DETEKSI PERUBAHAN PENGGUNAAN LAHAN DENGAN CITRA LANDSAT DAN SISTEM INFORMASI GEOGRAFIS: STUDI KASUS DI WILAYAH METROPOLITAN BANDUNG, INDONESIA SPATIAL VARIETY AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRADITIONAL MARKETS IN SURAKARTA AS POTENTIAL FACTORS IN IMPROVING SPATIAL-BASED MANAGEMENT LAND PRICE MAPPING OF JABODETABEK, INDONESIA QUALITY ANALYSIS OF SINGLE TREE OBJECT WITH OBIA AND VEGETATION INDEX FROM LAPAN SURVEILLANCE AIRCRAFT MULTISPECTRAL DATA IN URBAN AREA More cited articles

  1. Abdullah, Q. (2021a). Top Geospatial Trends of 2021. 

  2. Abdullah, Q. (2021b). Top Geospatial Trends to Watch in 2021. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 87 (3):149-151. 

  3. Ahmed, F., E. Moors, M. S. A. Khan, J. Warner, and C. T. Van Scheltinga. (2018). Tipping points in adaptation to urban flooding under climate change and urban growth: The case of the Dhaka megacity. Land Use Policy 79:496-506.

  4. Altıntaş, Y. D., and M. E. Ilal. (2021). Loose coupling of GIS and BIM data models for automated compliance checking against zoning codes. Automation in Construction 128:103743.

  5. Ameyaw, P. D., and W. T. de Vries. (2020). Transparency of Land Administration and the Role of Blockchain Technology, a Four-Dimensional Framework Analysis from the Ghanaian Land Perspective. Land 9 (12):491.

  6. Aslami, F., and A. Ghorbani. (2018). Object-based land-use/land-cover change detection using Landsat imagery: a case study of Ardabil, Namin, and Nir counties in northwest Iran. Environmental monitoring and assessment 190 (7):1-14.

  7. Asokan, A., and J. Anitha. (2019). Change detection techniques for remote sensing applications: a survey. Earth Science Informatics 12 (2):143-160.

  8. Bakır, N. Y., U. Doğan, M. K. Güngör, and B. Bostancı. (2018). Planned development versus unplanned change: The effects on urban planning in Turkey. Land Use Policy 77:310-321.

  9. Beil, C., and T. H. Kolbe. (2017). CityGML and the streets of New York - A proposal for detailed street space modelling. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. IV-4/W5:9-16.

  10. Bennett, R., P. v. Oosterom, C. Lemmen, and M. Koeva. (2020). Remote Sensing for Land Administration. Remote Sensing 12 (15):2497.

  11. Bennett, R. M., M. Pickering, and J. Sargent. (2019). Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector. Land Use Policy 83:435-448.

  12. Biljecki, F. (2016). A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 30 (7):1302-1335.

  13. Boodhoo, S. (2021). Developers versus Ratepayers?: contravening land use, zoning and development controls in Berea, Durban. 

  14. Brode, B. (2021). A Tale of Smart Cities: How Geospatial Solutions Contribute to Urban Security. 

  15. Buchori, I., A. Sugiri, M. Mussadun, D. Wadley, Y. Liu, A. Pramitasari, and I. T. Pamungkas. (2018). A predictive model to assess spatial planning in addressing hydro-meteorological hazards: A case study of Semarang City, Indonesia. International journal of disaster risk reduction 27:415-426.

  16. Budiman, A. (2020). The Implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) Program in Malang Regency Land Office. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik 6 (3).

  17. Chigbu, U. E., T. Bendzko, M. R. Mabakeng, E. D. Kuusaana, and D. O. Tutu. (2021). Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration from Theory to Practice: Three Demonstrative Case Studies of Local Land Administration Initiatives in Africa. Land 10 (5):476.

  18. Chipofya, M. C., S. Jan, and A. Schwering. (2021). SmartSkeMa: Scalable Documentation for Community and Customary Land Tenure. Land 10 (7):662.

  19. Çöltekin, A., I. Lochhead, M. Madden, S. Christophe, A. Devaux, C. Pettit, O. Lock, S. Shukla, L. Herman, and Z. Stachoň. (2020). Extended reality in spatial sciences: A review of research challenges and future directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (7):439.

  20. Datta, A. (2019). Top eight disruptive technologies and how they are relevant to geospatial. Geospatial world. 

  21. de Vries, W. T. (2018a). Opportunities and limits of making regions both lucrative and attractive. In Opportunities and Constraints of Land Management in Local and Regional Development. Integrated Knowledge. Factors and Trade-offs., edited by E. Hepperle, J. Paulsson, V. Maliene, R. Mansberger, A. Lisec and S. Guelton: vdf Hochschulverlag AG and der ETH Zürich, 13-23.

  22. de Vries, W. T. (2018b). Potential of big data for pro-active participatory land use planning. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning 5 (2 (Oct. 2018)):pp. 205-214.

  23. de Vries, W. T., J. Bugri, and F. Mandhu. (2020). Advancing Responsible and Smart Land Management. In Responsible and Smart Land Management Interventions: CRC Press, 279-286.

  24. Demetriou, D. (2018). Automating the land valuation process carried out in land consolidation schemes. Land Use Policy 75:21-32.

  25. Desai, R., S. Sanghvi, and N. Abhilaasha. (2018). Mapping Evictions and Resettlement in Ahmedabad, 2000-17.

  26. Dhini, A., I. S. Hardaya, and I. Surjandari. (2017). Clustering and visualization of community complaints and proposals using text mining and geographic information system. Paper read at 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech).

  27. Di Zio, S., A. Montanari, and B. Staniscia. (2010). Simulation of urban development in the City of Rome: Framework, methodology, and problem solving. Journal of Transport and Land Use 3 (2):85-105.

  28. Elmanisa, A. M., A. A. Kartiva, A. Fernando, R. Arianto, H. Winarso, and D. Zulkaidi. (2017). Land price mapping of Jabodetabek, Indonesia. 2017 4 (1):10.

  29. Estoque, R. C., and Y. Murayama. (2015). Intensity and spatial pattern of urban land changes in the megacities of Southeast Asia. Land Use Policy 48:213-222.

  30. Fang, F., M. Tambe, B. Dilkina, and A. J. Plumptre. (2019). Artificial intelligence and conservation: Cambridge University Press.

  31. Fuhrmann, C. (2021). Hanging Gardens: A City Crown for Halle by Walter Gropius in Virtual Reality. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture:171-183.

  32. GeoCTRL. (2021). Four Geospatial Analytic trends of 2021. 

  33. Georgiadou, Y., O. Kounadi, and A. Rolf. (2020). Digital earth ethics. In Manual of Digital Earth: Springer, Singapore, 785-810.

  34. Giuffrida, N., M. Le Pira, G. Inturri, and M. Ignaccolo. (2019). Mapping with stakeholders: An overview of public participatory GIS and VGI in transport decision-making. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8 (4):198.

  35. GIZ. (2012). Land use planning. Concepts, tools and applications, 268. 

  36. Gong, J., W. Chen, Y. Liu, and J. Wang. (2014). The intensity change of urban development land: Implications for the city master plan of Guangzhou, China. Land Use Policy 40:91-100.

  37. Goyal, L. K., R. Chauhan, R. Kumar, and H. S. Rai. (2020). Use of BIM in Development of Smart Cities: A Review. Paper read at IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

  38. Heckert, M., and C. D. Rosan. (2018). Creating GIS-based planning tools to promote equity through green infrastructure. Frontiers in Built Environment 4:27.

  39. Hentze, K., and G. Menz. (2015). “Bring Back the Land”—A Call to Refocus on the Spatial Dimension of Zimbabwe’s Land Reform. Land 4 (2):355-377.

  40. Hoffmann-Riem, W. (2020). Artificial intelligence as a challenge for law and regulation. In Regulating artificial intelligence: Springer, 1-29.

  41. Jankowski, P., K. Forss, M. Czepkiewicz, H. Saarikoski, and M. Kahila. (2021). Assessing impacts of PPGIS on urban land use planning: evidence from Finland and Poland. European Planning Studies:1-20.

  42. Kaden, R., C. Clemen, R. Seuß, J. Blankenbach, R. Becker, A. Eichhorn, A. Donaubauer, T. H. Kolbe, and U. Gruber. (2020). Leitfaden Geodäsie und BIM. Version 2.1. edited by G. u. L. e. V. DVW – Gesellschaft für Geodäsie and R. T. G. e.V.

  43. Ketzler, B., V. Naserentin, F. Latino, C. Zangelidis, L. Thuvander, and A. Logg. (2020). Digital twins for cities: A state of the art review. Built Environment 46 (4):547-573.

  44. Kieu, L.-M., N. Malleson, and A. Heppenstall. (2020). Dealing with uncertainty in agent-based models for short-term predictions. Royal Society open science 7 (1):191074.

  45. Kitsakis, D., and E. Dimopoulou. (2017). Addressing public law restrictions within a 3D cadastral context. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6 (7):182.

  46. Kleynhans, W., B. P. Salmon, K. J. Wessels, and J. C. Olivier. (2015). Rapid detection of new and expanding human settlements in the Limpopo province of South Africa using a spatio-temporal change detection method. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 40:74-80.

  47. Kusmiarto, K., H. Sutanta, and T. Aditya. (2020). The Level of Community Participation in Land Registration Activities in Indonesia. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 6 (1).

  48. Kutzner, T., K. Chaturvedi, and T. H. Kolbe. (2020). CityGML 3.0: New functions open up new applications. PFG–Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 88 (1):43-61.

  49. Li, W., Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhou. (2021). Policy Strategies to Revive Rural Land in Peri-Metropolitan Towns: Resource Identification, Capitalization, and Financialization. Land 10 (2):132.

  50. Lin, Z., A. Board, and L. Meng. (2020). User-centric geospatial analytics and visualization of catastrophe risk portfolio using the example of the insurance industry, Department of Aerospace and Geodesy, Technical University of Munich 

  51. Litwin, U., M. Pluta, and B. Mitka. (2017). Improving the Perception in Urban Planning by 3D Modelling and 3D Visualization. Land Ownership and Land Use Development: he Integration of Past, Present, and Future in Spatial Planning and Land Management Policies 209.

  52. Liu, J., G. Zhang, Z. Zhuang, Q. Cheng, Y. Gao, T. Chen, Q. Huang, L. Xu, and D. Chen. (2017). A new perspective for urban development boundary delineation based on SLEUTH-InVEST model. Habitat International 70:13-23.

  53. Lock, O., T. Bednarz, and C. Pettit. (2019). HoloCity–exploring the use of augmented reality cityscapes for collaborative understanding of high-volume urban sensor data. Paper read at The 17th International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry.

  54. Maas, M. M. (2019). International law does not compute: Artificial intelligence and the development, displacement or destruction of the global legal order. Melbourne Journal of International Law 20 (1):29-57.

  55. Marcot, B. G., and T. D. Penman. (2019). Advances in Bayesian network modelling: Integration of modelling technologies. Environmental Modelling & Software 111:386-393.

  56. Marcucci, E., V. Gatta, M. Le Pira, L. Hansson, and S. Bråthen. (2020). Digital Twins: A Critical Discussion on Their Potential for Supporting Policy-Making and Planning in Urban Logistics. Sustainability 12 (24):10623.

  57. Meenar, M., and J. Kitson. (2020). Using Multi-Sensory and Multi-Dimensional Immersive Virtual Reality in Participatory Planning. Urban Science 4 (3):34.

  58. Metternicht, G. (2018). Land Use and Spatial Planning: Enabling Sustainable Management of Land Resources: Springer.

  59. Mireku, S. A. (2020). Urban Blight in the Context of Ghana. A Case Study of East Legon, Accra, University of Twente.

  60. Muhammad, A. N., A. M. Aseere, H. Chiroma, H. Shah, A. Y. Gital, and I. A. T. Hashem. (2021). Deep learning application in smart cities: recent development, taxonomy, challenges and research prospects. Neural Computing and Applications 33 (7):2973-3009.

  61. Mustafa, A., M. Cools, I. Saadi, and J. Teller. (2017). Coupling agent-based, cellular automata and logistic regression into a hybrid urban expansion model (HUEM). Land Use Policy 69:529-540.

  62. Muth, R., K. Eisenhut, J. Rabe, and F. Tschorsch. (2019). BBBlockchain: Blockchain-based Participation in Urban Development. Paper read at 2019 15th International Conference on eScience (eScience).

  63. NOAA. (2021). What is Lidar? 

  64. Offei, E., M. Lengoiboni, and M. Koeva. (2018). Compliance with residential building standards in the context of customary land tenure system in Ghana. PlaNext.

  65. Paasch, J. M., and J. Paulsson. (2021). 3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited. Land 10 (5):494.

  66. Pauschinger, D., and F. Klauser. (2020). Aerial Politics of Visibility: Actors, Spaces, and Drivers of Professional Drone Usage in Switzerland. Surveillance & Society 18 (4):443-466.

  67. Pepe, M., D. Costantino, V. S. Alfio, M. G. Angelini, and A. Restuccia Garofalo. (2020). A CityGML Multiscale Approach for the Conservation and Management of Cultural Heritage: The Case Study of the Old Town of Taranto (Italy). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (7):449.

  68. Petrescu, D. C., T. Hartel, and R. M. Petrescu-Mag. (2020). Global land grab: Toward a country typology for future land negotiations. Land Use Policy 99:104960.

  69. Pokonieczny, K. (2016). Using artificial neural networks to determine the location of wind farms. Miedzna district case study. Journal of Water and Land Development.

  70. Prakash, P., and H. Bharath. (2020). Assessment of Urban Built-Up Volume Using Geospatial Methods: A Case Study of Bangalore. Paper read at IGARSS 2020-2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

  71. Pržulj, Đ., N. Radaković, D. Sladić, A. Radulović, and M. Govedarica. (2019). Domain model for cadastral systems with land use component. Survey Review 51 (365):135-146.

  72. PU, X., L. LIU, C. Huailu, and X. XU. (2013). The zoning of land utilization division in guanghe, gansu. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 27 (2):64-69.

  73. Purevtseren, M., B. Tsegmid, M. Indra, and M. Sugar. (2018). The fractal geometry of urban land use: The case of Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia. Land 7 (2):67.

  74. Radočaj, D., J. Obhođaš, M. Jurišić, and M. Gašparović. (2020). Global Open Data Remote Sensing Satellite Missions for Land Monitoring and Conservation: A Review. Land 9 (11):402.

  75. Richardson, D. (2017). Five Tech Trends Driving New Geospatial Development. In Crossing Borders.

  76. Setyono, J. S., H. S. Yunus, and S. R. Giyarsih. (2016). The spatial pattern of urbanization and small cities development in Central Java: a case study of Semarang-Yogyakarta-Surakarta region. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning 3 (1):14.

  77. Sun, J., S. Mi, P.-o. Olsson, J. Paulsson, and L. Harrie. (2019). Utilizing BIM and GIS for Representation and Visualization of 3D Cadastre. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8 (11):503.

  78. Teja, B. S., K. V. Rao, Y. Navatha, R. Shukla, and P. S. Kumar. (2020). Developing Of Geoweb Application For Urban Planning. In Applications Of Geomatics In Civil Engineering: Springer, 539-545.

  79. Thapa, R., and V. Bahuguna. (2021). Monitoring Land Encroachment and Land Use & Land Cover (LULC) Change in The Pachhua Dun, Dehradun District Using Landsat Images 1989 and 2020. JGISE: Journal of Geospatial Information Science and Engineering 4 (1):71-80.

  80. Tomko, M., and S. Winter. (2019). Beyond digital twins–A commentary. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46 (2):395-399.

  81. Tongur, V., E. Ertunc, and M. Uyan. (2020). Use of the Migrating Birds Optimization (MBO) Algorithm in solving land distribution problem. Land Use Policy 94:104550.

  82. USC (University of Southern California), S. S. I. (2021). Top GIS Technologies in 2021 & Beyond. In GIS Technology.

  83. Verheye, B. (2020). Land Registration in the Twenty-First Century: Blockchain Land Registers from a Civil Law Perspective. In Disruptive Technology, Legal Innovation, and the Future of Real Estate: Springer, 123-135.

  84. Wang, S. W., B. M. Gebru, M. Lamchin, R. B. Kayastha, and W.-K. Lee. (2020). Land use and land cover change detection and prediction in the Kathmandu district of Nepal using remote sensing and GIS. Sustainability 12 (9):3925.

  85. Werner, M., and Y.-Y. Chiang. (2021). Handbook of Big Geospatial Data: Springer Nature.

  86. Williams, K. (2017). Spatial planning, urban form and sustainable transport: An introduction. In Spatial planning, urban form and sustainable transport: Citeseer, 15-28.

  87. Ye, Z., Y. Xu, R. Huang, X. Tong, X. Li, X. Liu, K. Luan, L. Hoegner, and U. Stilla. (2020). Lasdu: A large-scale aerial lidar dataset for semantic labeling in dense urban areas. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (7):450.

  88. Yunus, A. M., and F. A. M. Azmi. (2020). Drone Technology as A Modern Tool in Monitoring the Rural-Urban Development. Paper read at IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

  89. Zheng, L., L. Zhou, X. Zhao, L. Liao, and W. Liu. (2017). The spatio-temporal data modeling and application based on graph database. Paper read at 2017 4th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE).

  90. Zou, S., and L. Wang. (2020). Individual vacant house detection in very-high-resolution remote sensing images. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):449-461.


Last update:

  1. A Methodological Approach towards Cyber Risk Management in Land Administrations Systems

    Pierre-François Blin, Trias Aditya, Purnama Budi Santosa, Christophe Claramunt. Land, 13 (1), 2023. doi: 10.3390/land13010019

  2. Construction and optimization of ecological security patterns based on social equity perspective: A case study in Wuhan, China

    Xufeng Cui, Wei Deng, Jixin Yang, Wei Huang, Walter T. de Vries. Ecological Indicators, 136 , 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108714

  3. Smart Land Use Planning: New Theories, New Tools and New Practice

    Xufeng Cui, Fei Li, Walter Timo de Vries. Land, 12 (7), 2023. doi: 10.3390/land12071315

  4. ARCHIVING TRADITIONAL HOUSES THROUGH DIGITAL SOCIAL MAPPING: AN INNOVATION APPROACH FOR LIVING HERITAGE CONSERVATION IN JAVA

    Atiek Suprapti, Anang Wahyu Sejati, Edward Endrianto Pandelaki, Agung Budi Sardjono. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 46 (1), 2022. doi: 10.3846/jau.2022.14275

  5. Flood hazard risk assessment based on multi-criteria spatial analysis GIS as input for spatial planning policies in Tegal Regency, Indonesia

    Sejati Wahyu, Savira Putri, Sri Rahayu, Imam Buchori, Kristantri Rahayu, Wiratmaja Andika, Ahmad Muzaki, Yudi Basuki. Geographica Pannonica, 27 (1), 2023. doi: 10.5937/gp27-40927

  6. The spatial analysis of urbanization dynamic impacts in a 50-year flood frequency in Java, Indonesia

    Anang Wahyu Sejati, Imam Buchori, Nattaya Mlatti Lakshita, I. G. Andika Wiratmaja, Desyta Ulfiana. Natural Hazards, 120 (3), 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-06298-y

  7. Evaluating geospatial education provision: a case study of Aotearoa New Zealand

    Mairéad de Róiste, Scott C. Pool, John H. Lowry. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 2024. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2024.2403075

Last update: 2024-11-24 12:14:24

No citation recorded.