DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.10.2.151-166

Assessing Smart Growth Implementation and Its Impact on Urban Sprawl: A Content and GIS-Based Analysis

*Nilam Atsirina Krisnaputri publons  -  Urban and Regional Department, Universitas Agung Podomoro, Indonesia
Angrenggani Pramitasari  -  Urban and Regional Department, Universitas Agung Podomoro, Indonesia
Elsa Try Julita Sembiring  -  Urban and Regional Department, Universitas Agung Podomoro, Indonesia
Rahmatyas Aditantri  -  Urban and Regional Department, Universitas Agung Podomoro, Indonesia
Lela Alifah Rahmi  -  Urban and Regional Department, Universitas Agung Podomoro, Indonesia
Maria Dini Gilang Prathivi  -  Universitas Agung Podomoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Smart growth (SG) is a set of policies and regulations implemented to mitigate the expansion of urban sprawl. SG is a planning approach that prioritizes creating compact, mixed-use, and high-density urban areas to foster sustainable regional development. Nevertheless, it is important to note that both theoretically and practically SG is still undergoing refinement to ensure its suitability and applicability within the context of land control regulations in each location. The Bodetabek region in Indonesia is seeing rapid growth. Nevertheless, amidst this exponential expansion, the extent to which the local government has embraced SG concepts in its regional development remains uncertain. The primary aim of this study is to assess the extent to which SG concepts have been implemented in the domain of urban planning within the Bodetabek region. The methods of this paper are divided into several stages. Firstly, an examination is conducted to determine the extent to which SG concepts have been incorporated into the planning policy of the Bodetabek area. Subsequently, an assessment is made of the urban sprawl that has occurred in the Bodetabek area for 20 years. Lastly, an analysis is performed to investigate the pattern of urban expansion in the Bodetabek. The findings in this research show that the SG idea has been implemented in the Bodetabek region. The correlation between the proportion of SG content in Bodetabek local laws and land cover changes is evident. There is an inverse relationship between the proportion of SG content in local legislation and the extent of urban development in the Bodetabek area. Naturally, these findings provide preliminary evidence or indicators that can serve as a reminder of the potential of SG to curb urban sprawl, effectively aligning with established theoretical frameworks.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: impact, implementation, land cover change, smart growth, urban sprawl

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research
Language : EN
Recent articles
Investigating the Relationship between Resilience and the Situation of Risk in the Face of Natural Disasters Classification of Mangrove Vegetation Structure using Airborne LiDAR in Ratai Bay, Lampung Province, Indonesia Illustration of Rapid Urban Growth in Surkhet Valley of Nepal via Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics Sonic Justice and Tree Equity: Exploring Spatial Correlations between Aviation-Related Noise, Demographics, and Tree Canopy More recent articles
Most cited articles
A GIS BASED EVALUATION OF LAND USE CHANGES AND ECOLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY INDEX LAND PRICE MAPPING OF JABODETABEK, INDONESIA DETEKSI PERUBAHAN PENGGUNAAN LAHAN DENGAN CITRA LANDSAT DAN SISTEM INFORMASI GEOGRAFIS: STUDI KASUS DI WILAYAH METROPOLITAN BANDUNG, INDONESIA SUBAK LAND INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED ON REMOTE SENSING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM IN DENPASAR CITY MONITORING THE LAND USE CHANGE IN CAMPUS 2 STKIP PGRI PONTIANAK More cited articles

  1. Abrantes, P., Fontes, I., Gomes, E., & Rocha, J. (2016). Compliance of land cover changes with municipal land use planning: Evidence from the Lisbon metropolitan region (1990–2007). Land Use Policy, 51, 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2015.10.023">[Crossref]

  2. Addison, C., Zhang, S., & Coomes, B. (2013). Smart Growth and Housing Affordability: A Review of Regulatory Mechanisms and Planning Practices. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(3), 215–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412212471563">[Crossref] 

  3. Ali, A. K. (2015). Explaining city applications of smart growth policies: insights from Maryland, USA. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 8(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2015.1078336">[Crossref] 

  4. AlKhereibi, A., AlSuwaidi, M., Al-Mohammed, R., Pokharel, S., & Ayari, M. (2021). An integrated urban-transport smart growth model around metro stations: A case of Qatar. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 10, 100392.

  5. Appleyard, B. S., Frost, A. R., & Allen, C. (2019). Are all transit stations equal and equitable ? Calculating sustainability, livability , health , & equity performance of smart. Journal of Transport & Health, 14(January 2017), 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100584">[Crossref]

  6. Arifwidodo, S. D. (2012). Exploring the effect of compact development policy to urban quality of life in Bandung, Indonesia. City, Culture and Society, 3(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2012.11.007">[Crossref] 

  7. Artmann, M., Inostroza, L., & Fan, P. (2019). Urban sprawl, compact urban development and green cities. How much do we know, how much do we agree? Ecological Indicators, 96, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2018.10.059">[Crossref]

  8. Attino, M. (2018). Challenges Posed by Urban Sprawl Pattern in Wuhan/china (1990-2010). 110–124.

  9. Aurand, A. (2010). Density, housing types and mixed land use: Smart tools for affordable housing? Urban Studies, 47(5), 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353076">[Crossref] 

  10. Bagheri, B., & Tousi, S. N. (2018). An explanation of urban sprawl phenomenon in Shiraz Metropolitan Area (SMA). Cities, 73, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.011">[Crossref] 

  11. Baśnou, C., Álvarez, E., Bagaria, G., Guardiola, M., Isern, R., Vicente, P., & Pino, J. (2013). Spatial patterns of land use changes across a mediterranean metropolitan landscape: Implications for biodiversity management. Environmental Management, 52(4), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0150-5">[Crossref] 

  12. Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R., Kaiser, E. J., & Rodriguez, D. A. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning (Vol. 1). University of Illinois.

  13. Bhatta, B., Saraswati, S., & Bandyopadhyay, D. (2010). Urban sprawl measurement from remote sensing data. Applied Geography, 30(4), 731–740.

  14. BPTJ. (2018). TOD Poris Plawad. Bptj.Dephub.Go.Id.

  15. Buchori, I, Rahmayana, L., Pangi, P., Pramitasari, A., Sejati, A. W., Basuki, Y., & Bramiana, C. N. (2021). In situ urbanization-driven industrial activities: the Pringapus enclave on the rural-urban fringe of Semarang Metropolitan Region, Indonesia. International Journal of Urban Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1925141">[Crossref]

  16. Buchori, Imam, Sugiri, A., Maryono, M., Pramitasari, A., & Pamungkas, I. T. D. (2017). Theorizing spatial dynamics of metropolitan regions: A preliminary study in Java and Madura Islands, Indonesia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35(August), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.022">[Crossref] 

  17. Burchell, R. W., Listokin, D., & Galley, C. C. (2000). Smart growth: More than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 821–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2000.9521390">[Crossref] 

  18. Calthorpe, P. (1990). Transit-Oriented Development Design Guidelines. Calthorpe Associates.

  19. Chapin, T. S. (2012). Introduction From Growth Controls, to Comprehensive Planning, to Smart Growth: Planning’s Emerging Fourth Waves. April 2013, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.645273">[Crossref] 

  20. de la Cruz, E. E. R. (2009). Local political institutions and smart growth: An empirical study of the politics of compact development. Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), 218–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409334309">[Crossref] 

  21. Dewita, Y., Yen, B. T. H., & Burke, M. (2018). The link between compact urban form and housing affordability in Indonesia: Where is the empirical evidence? 2018 Joint Asia-Pacific Network for Housing Research and Australasian Housing Researchers Conference, APNHR and AHRC 2018 - Proceedings, 284–295.

  22. Downs, A. (2005). Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More than We Do It. 71(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976707">[Crossref]

  23. Fadli, A., & Alexander, H. B. (2022). Rusun TOD di Depok Cocok untuk Milenial Bergaji Rp 8 Juta, ini Tampilannya. Kompas.Com.

  24. Fauzi, M. (2016). Karakteristik Daya Tarik Kota Bekasi pada Perkembangan Pembangunan Apartemen. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

  25. Filion, Pierre, & McSpurren, K. (2007). Smart growth and development reality: The difficult co-ordination of land use and transport objectives. Urban Studies, 44(3), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601176055">[Crossref]

  26. Fitriani, I. N., Juhadi, & Indrayanti, A. (2018). Fenomena Urban Sprawl Jabodetabek. Edu Geography, 6(1), 53–61.

  27. Frederick, C., Riggs, W., & Gilderbloom, J. H. (2018). Commute mode diversity and public health: A multivariate analysis of 148 US cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1321705">[Crossref] 

  28. Freilich, R. H. (1999). From Sprawl to Smart Growth: Successful Legal, Planning, and Environmental Systems. Section of State and Local Government American Bar Asssciation.

  29. Ghalib, H. (2018). Smart Growth in Cairoos Urban Development Strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3162546">[Crossref] 

  30.  

  31. Grant, J. L. (2009). Theory and practice in planning the suburbs: Challenges to implementing new urbanism, smart growth, and sustainability principles. Planning Theory and Practice, 10(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802661683">[Crossref] 

  32. Gray, R. C. (2007). Ten Years of Smart Growth: A Nod to Policies Past and a Prospective Glimpse Into the Future. In Social Science Research Network.

  33. Gren, Å., Colding, J., Berghauser-Pont, M., & Marcus, L. (2019). How smart is smart growth? Examining the environmental validation behind city compaction. Ambio, 48(6), 580–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1087-y">[Crossref] 

  34. Habibi, S., & Asadi, N. (2011). Causes, results and methods of controlling urban sprawl. Procedia Engineering, 21, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2011.11.1996">[Crossref] 

  35. Harmain, R., Sari Hasibuan, H., & Sodri, A. (2020). Socio-Economic behind TOD in Jakarta. E3S Web of Conferences, 202. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020203014">[Crossref] 

  36. Harris, J. C., & Evans, J. S. (2000). Sprawl Brawl: Battle Lines Drawn in Smart Growth Debate. Real Estate Issues, April.

  37. Hidajat, J. T., Sitorus, S. R. P., Rustiadi, E., & Machfud. (2013). Identification of Urban Sprawl Phenomenon in Urban Fringe Settlement  areas of JABODETABEK. Resilient Megacities: Idea, Reality, and Movement, 85–93.

  38. ICMA, & SGN. (2002). Getting to Smart Growth: 100 Policies for Implementation.

  39. Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05285119">[Crossref] 

  40. Jerrett, M., Almanza, E., Davies, M., Wolch, J., Dunton, G., Spruitj-Metz, D., & Ann Pentz, M. (2013). Smart Growth Community Design and Physical Activity in Children. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(4), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.010">[Crossref] 

  41. Kushner, J. A. (2002). Smart Growth, New Urbanism and Diversity: Progressive Planning Movements in America and Their Impact on Poor and Minority Ethnic Populations. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l5211019395">[Crossref] 

  42. Lantara, F. (2023). Depok Punya Potensi Kuat Sebagai KJota Kreatif. Antaranews.Com.

  43. Litman, T. (2022). Evaluating Criticism of Smart Growth. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 1(June), 91.

  44. Litman, Todd. (2000). An Economic Evaluation of Smart Growth and TDM: Social Welfare and Equity Impacts of Efforts to Reduce Sprawl and Automobile Dependency.

  45. Litman, Todd. (2022). A Labor Perspective on Smart Growth How Workers and Unions Benefit from Compact, Multimodal Development A Labor Perspective on Smart Growth. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

  46. Menzori, I. D., Sousa, I. C. N. de, & Gonçalves, L. M. (2021). Urban growth management and territorial governance approaches: A master plans conformance analysis. Land Use Policy, 105(September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105436">[Crossref] 

  47. Mohammed, I., Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Adenle, Y. A. (2016). An approach to assess the effectiveness of smart growth in achieving sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040397">[Crossref] 

  48. Nugraha, U., Resosudarmo, B. P., & Nasrudin, R. (2023). Examining the impact of urban compactness on work and social life disruption during COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Jakarta, Indonesia. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-023-00347-7">[Crossref] 

  49. O’Connell, L. (2009). The impact of local supporters on smart growth policy adoption. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360902885495">[Crossref] 

  50. OECD. (2018). Rethinking Urban Sprawl. In Rethinking Urban Sprawl. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189881-en">[Crossref] 

  51. Ramadhan, B. (2022). Pemkab Bogor Siapkan Opsi Rumah Susun di Perkotaan. News.Replubika.Co.Id.

  52. Raparthi, K. (2015). Assessing Smart-Growth Strategies in Indian Cities: Grounded Theory Approach to Planning Practice. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(4).

  53. Ratnaningtyas, N., Rahayu, P., & Istanabi, T. (2022). Potensi Penerapan Konsep Kota Kompak Di Kota Depok Dari Aspek Tata Guna Lahan Dan Sistem Transportasi. Desa-Kota, 4(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.20961/desa-kota.v4i2.55498.181-195">[Crossref] 

  54. Republika.id. (2021). Kota Bogor Memiliki Enam Kawasan TOD. Republika.Id.

  55. Ronal. (2021). Resmi Meluncur, Kota Bogor Punya BisKita Trans Pakuan. Pasardana.Id.

  56. Rumah.com. (2021a). Apartemen di Bogor Berkembang Pesat, Berpeluang daripada Rumah Tapak? Rumah.Com.

  57. Rumah.com. (2021b). Kini Saatnya Pertimbangkan Apartemen di Tangerang. Rumah.Com.

  58. Salsabila, P. (2019). Apartemen di Tangerang Masih Jadi Favorit sebagai Tempat Tinggal. Ekonomi Bisnis.

  59. Salvati, L., Munafo, M., Morelli, V. G., & Sabbi, A. (2012). Low-density settlements and land use changes in a Mediterranean urban region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1–2), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2011.11.020">[Crossref] 

  60. Sari, D. N. (2018). Peran Pertumbuhan Apartemen di Kota Bekasi Terhadap Struktur Ruang Metropolitan (Dengan Pendekatan Analisis Penilaian Real Estate). Universitas Gadjah Mada.

  61. Shawly, H. (2022). Evaluating Compact City Model Implementation as a Sustainable Urban Development Tool to Control Urban Sprawl in the City of Jeddah. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013218">[Crossref]

  62. Sulistyawaty, A. R., Nababan, H. F., & Yogatama, B. K. (2023). Potensi LRT Perkuat Simpul Angkutan Kota. Kompas.Id.

  63. TNG. (2023). Peningkatan Layanan Bus Rapid Transit di Kota Tangerang melalui Kerjasama PT Tangerang Nusantara Global dan PT Nusantara Global Inovasi. Tng.Id.

  64. Wang, Y., Lee, B., & Greenlee, A. (2021). The Role of Smart Growth in Residential Location Choice: Heterogeneity of Location Preferences in the Chicago Region. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X211017652">[Crossref] 

  65. Włoch-Szymla, A. (2019). Urban sprawl and smart growth versus quality of life. Czasopismo Techniczne, 12, 85–98. https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737xct.19.131.11497">[Crossref] 

  66.  


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-10 20:18:31

No citation recorded.