DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.12.2.239-252

Integration of AHP and GIS to Derive Walkability Index for Women to Access Rail-Transit Station

Nur Intan Marlissa Nazri  -  School of Geomatics and Natural Resources, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, Malaysia
*Nabilah Naharudin orcid  -  School of Geomatics and Natural Resources, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, Malaysia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study utilized Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to develop a walkability index for women in accessing rail transit stations. By integrating spatial analysis and multi-criteria decision-making techniques, it addressed key factors such as accessibility, comfort, traffic safety, and attractiveness from a gender-specific perspective. The aim of the research is to identify barriers women face in accessing public transportation and provide actionable insights for urban planning. Expert and public input were gathered to determine the weightage of criteria influencing walkability. Pairwise comparisons through AHP were used to ensure consistent weighting of criteria, while GIS was employed to map and analyze walkability indices. The findings emphasized the need for inclusive urban planning that considers women's unique safety and mobility concerns, offering recommendations for tailored policy interventions. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of GIS and AHP in evaluating walkability, incorporating physical and social dimensions to reflect women’s needs in urban environments. Recommendations include integrating real-time data, engaging diverse groups through surveys and focus groups, and expanding the model to other demographic groups. The research highlights the role of enhanced walkability in promoting mobility, increasing public transit use, reducing congestion, and improving public health. Future studies should refine methodologies, incorporate dynamic data, and broaden assessments to ensure equitable and sustainable urban development. This approach underscores the importance of addressing gender-specific needs to create safer, more accessible, and inclusive cities.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: AHP; GIS; MCDA; Rail-Transit; Walkability
Funding: Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pusat Geospatial Negara

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research
Language : EN
Recent articles
Spatial Classification of Sentinel-2 Satellite Images with Machine Learning Approach Empirical Evidence of Environmental Degradation Using Geospatial Technology in Tasik Temenggor, Royal Belum Perak, Malaysia Classification and Monitoring of Kahayan River Riparian Zone Settlement Expansion Utilizing Satellite Imagery to Prevent Environmental Damage More recent articles
Most cited articles
LAND PRICE MAPPING OF JABODETABEK, INDONESIA PEMANFAATAN CITRA SATELIT UNTUK PENENTUAN LAHAN KRITIS MANGROVE DI KECAMATAN TUGU, KOTA SEMARANG QUALITY ANALYSIS OF SINGLE TREE OBJECT WITH OBIA AND VEGETATION INDEX FROM LAPAN SURVEILLANCE AIRCRAFT MULTISPECTRAL DATA IN URBAN AREA THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING AND ITS APPLICATION FOR FLOATING FISH NET CULTURE DETEKSI PERUBAHAN PENGGUNAAN LAHAN DENGAN CITRA LANDSAT DAN SISTEM INFORMASI GEOGRAFIS: STUDI KASUS DI WILAYAH METROPOLITAN BANDUNG, INDONESIA More cited articles

  1. Ahmad, A. A., & Naharudin, N. (2022). Walkability Index in Pasir Gudang by using GIS. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1051(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1051/1/012015">[Crossref]

  2. Arshad, A. K., Bahari, N. I., Hashim, W., & Abdul Halim, A. G. (2016). Gender Differences in Pedestrian Perception and Satisfaction on the Walkability of Kuala Lumpur City Center. MATEC Web of Conferences, 47, 03003. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164703003">[Crossref]

  3. Atakara, C., & Allahmoradi, M. (2021). Investigating the Urban Spatial Growth by Using Space Syntax and GIS—A Case Study of Famagusta City. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(10), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100638">[Crossref]

  4. Azlan, A. I. M., & Naharudin, N. (2020). Measuring Safety Index 

  5. for Pedestrian Path by Using AHP-GIS. Built Environment Journal (BEJ), 17(3), 67–75.

  6. Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Walkability and its Relationships With Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218">[Crossref]

  7. Basu, N., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., King, M., Kamruzzaman, M., & Haque, M. M. (2022). The Influence of the Built Environment on Pedestrians’ Perceptions of Attractiveness, Safety and Security. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 87, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.006">[Crossref]

  8. Bozovic, T. (2025). Urban Walkability and Equity in the Car-Centric City. In Inclusive Cities and Global Urban Transformation: Infrastructures, Intersectionalities, and Sustainable Development (pp. 77–85). Springer Nature Singapore Singapore.

  9. Bridge, G. (2025). Equitable Mobility: Enhancing Walkability and Rollability for Inclusive and Healthy Communities. Cities & Health, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2025.2468016">[Crossref]

  10. Carpentieri, G., Guida, C., Gorrini, A., Messa, F., Abdelfattah, L., & Stiuso, T. (2023). Digital Data in Support of Innovation for Urban Practice: Women-Inclusive Walkable Cities–Naples, a Case Study (pp. 244–255). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37123-3_19">[Crossref]

  11. Chang, K.-T. (2016). Introduction to Geographic Information Systems (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Boston.

  12. Cook, S., Stevenson, L., Aldred, R., Kendall, M., & Cohen, T. (2022). More than Walking and Cycling: What is ‘active travel’? Transport Policy, 126, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.015">[Crossref]

  13. Dasari, S., & Gupta, S. (2023). Application of Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process to Develop Walkability Index: A Case Study of Dwarka Sub City, New Delhi, India. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2278875">[Crossref]

  14. Dzulkifli, S. (2023). Interactive: Which are the Most Popular LRT, MRT and Monorail Stations? Find Out Here. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/11/10/interactive-which-are-the-most-popular-lrt-mrt-and%20monorail-stations-find-out-here">  

  15. Elhosni, S., & Faiz, S. (2021). GIS-Based Evolutionary Approaches Using Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Spatial Issues (pp. 49–61). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1954-7.ch003">[Crossref]

  16. Gaglione, F., Gargiulo, C., & Zucaro, F. (2022). Where can the Elderly Walk? A Spatial Multi-Criteria Method to Increase Urban Pedestrian Accessibility. Cities, 127, 103724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103724">[Crossref]

  17. Golan Y, Wilkinson N, Henderson JM, Weverka A (2019) Gendered Walkability: Building a Daytime Walkability Index for Women. J Transp Land Use 12:. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2019.1472">[Crossref]

  18. Gorrini, A., Presicce, D., Choubassi, R., & Sener, I. N. (2021). Assessing the Level of Walkability for Women Using GIS and Location-based Open Data: The Case of New York City. Findings. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.30794">[Crossref]

  19. Harumain, Y. A. S., Azmi, N. F., & Yusoff, S. (2020). Creating Walking LED Transit Stations for Women in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 7(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v7i1.8912">[Crossref]

  20. Khotbehsara, E. M., Yu, R., Somasundaraswaran, K., Askarizad, R., & Kolbe-Alexander, T. (2025). The Walkable Environment: A Systematic Review Through the Lens of Space Syntax as an Integrated Approach. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-02-2024-0049">[Crossref]

  21. Körmeçli, P. Ş. (2023). Analysis of Walkable Street Networks by Using the Space Syntax and GIS Techniques: A Case Study of Çankırı City. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(6), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12060216">[Crossref]

  22. López-Lambas, M. E., Sánchez, J. M., & Alonso, A. (2021). The Walking Health: A Route Choice Model to Analyze the Street Factors Enhancing Active Mobility. Journal of Transport & Health, 22, 101133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101133">[Crossref]

  23. Malczewski, J. (2006). Ordered Weighted Averaging with Fuzzy Quantifiers: GIS-based Multicriteria Evaluation for Land-Use Suitability Analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.01.003">[Crossref]

  24. Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science (Vol. 1). Springer.

  25. Manzolli, J. A., Oliveira, A., & Neto, M. de C. (2021). Evaluating Walkability through a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach: A Lisbon Case Study. Sustainability, 13(3), 1450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031450">[Crossref]

  26. Naharudin, N., Salleh, A. H., Halim, M. A., & Latif, Z. A. (2020). Conceptual Framework for Walkability Assessment for Pedestrian Access to Rail Transit Services by using Spatial-MCDA. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 540(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012023">[Crossref]

  27. Oppio, A., Bottero, M., & Arcidiacono, A. (2022). Assessing Urban Quality: A Proposal for a MCDA Evaluation Framework. Annals of Operations Research, 312(2), 1427–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2738-2">[Crossref]

  28. Otsuka, N., Wittowsky, D., Damerau, M., & Gerten, C. (2021). Walkability Assessment for Urban Areas Around Railway Stations Along the Rhine-Alpine Corridor. Journal of Transport Geography, 93, 103081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103081">[Crossref]

  29. Pandey, M. (2023). Pedestrian Deaths Hit a 41-Year High. Reckless Driving and Bigger Cars may be to Blame. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/why-pedestrian-deaths-hit-41-year-high-rcna91506">  

  30. Rui, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2023). Examining the Role of Innovative Streets in Enhancing Urban Mobility and Livability for Sustainable Urban Transition: A Review. Sustainability, 15(7), 5709. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075709">[Crossref]

  31. Ruslan, N., Naharudin, N., Salleh, A. H., Abdul Halim, M., & Abd Latif, Z. (2023). Spatial Walkability Index (SWI) of Pedestrian Access to Rail Transit Station in Kuala Lumpur City Center. Planning Malaysia, 21. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1368">[Crossref]

  32. Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision Making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5">[Crossref]

  33. Scarponi, L., Abdelfattah, L., Gorrini, A., Valenzuela Cortés, C., Carpentieri, G., Guida, C., Zucaro, F., Andreola, F., Muzzonigro, A., Da Re, L., Gargiulo, E., Cañas, C., Walker, J., & Choubassi, R. (2023). Thematic Review on Women’s Perception of Safety While Walking in Public Space: The STEP UP Project. Sustainability, 15(21), 15636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115636">[Crossref]

  34. Schantz, P., Olsson, K. S. E., Salier Eriksson, J., & Rosdahl, H. (2022). Perspectives on Exercise Intensity, Volume, Step Characteristics and Health Outcomes in Walking for Transport. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.911863">[Crossref]

  35. Schulze, U. (2021). “GIS Works!”—But why, how, and for whom? Findings from a Systematic Review. Transactions in GIS, 25(2), 768–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12704">[Crossref]

  36. Shields, R., Gomes da Silva, E. J., Lima e Lima, T., & Osorio, N. (2023). Walkability: A Review of Trends. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1936601">[Crossref]

  37. Syazwany, Nur Syaza., S., Nabilah, N., & Wan Buliana, W. S. (2024). Determining Themed Walking Trails in Bandar Hilir Malacca by Using Spatial-MCDA. ALAM CIPTA International Journal Of Sustainable Tropical Design & Practice, 17(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.47836/AC.17.1.PAPER01">[Crossref]

  38. Telega, A., Telega, I., & Bieda, A. (2021). Measuring Walkability with GIS—Methods Overview and New Approach Proposal. Sustainability, 13(4), 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041883">[Crossref]

  39. van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2021). Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3">[Crossref]

  40. WHO. (2023). Promoting Physical Activity for Older People: A Toolkit for Action. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240076648">  

  41. Więckowski, J., Sałabun, W., Kizielewicz, B., Bączkiewicz, A., Shekhovtsov, A., Paradowski, B., & Wątróbski, J. (2023). Recent Advances in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Applications and Trends. International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems, 27(4), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.3233/KES-230487">[Crossref]


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-01-05 13:40:04

No citation recorded.