ANALISIS COST AND EFFECTIVITY PROGRAM KARTU PRAKERJA DI INDONESIA

*Yasserina Rawie  -  Kajian Ketahanan Nasional, Sekolah Kajian Stratejik dan Intelijen, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Palupi Lindiasari Samputra  -  Kajian Ketahanan Nasional, Sekolah Kajian Stratejik dan Intelijen, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 29 Aug 2020; Published: 30 Oct 2020.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Abstract

This article discusses the feasibility of the Program Kartu Prakerja as a social security program in dealing with the problem of unemployment in Indonesia. As a form of social security program, Suharyadi et al (2015) stated that the pre-employment card program is possible to overcome the problem of unemployment and poverty in Indonesia. However, other research conducted by Shomad (2010) explains that social security cannot overcome poverty. An example is the Direct Cash Assistance (BLT) program in the era of former president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who faced a number of obstacles in realizing social welfare. This research is a recommendation research as a procedure in the analysis of the Workers Card policy to see the feasibility of the program. This research uses a quantitative approach with cost and effective analysis. Cost and effectivity analysis is done by making a comparative picture related to the cost and effectiveness of Program Kartu Prakerja. Based on the results of the analysis of cost effectiveness in this study, it was found that the most effective was alternative 2 (ratio 15: Rp. 11,207,402,000,000), namely only by providing training to the unemployed. Therefore, based on the results of the analysis in this study, Program Kartu Prakerja is feasible, but there are things that need to be reconsidered, namely the provision of incentives for the unemployed.

Keywords: unemployment; Kartu Prakerja; cost and effective analysis

Article Metrics:

  1. Achwan, Rochman. (2014). Sosiologi Ekonomi di Indonesia. Jakarta: UI Press
  2. Dunn, William N. (2000). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
  3. Mulyadi, Mohammad. (2016). ”Peran Pemerintah dalam Mengatasi Pengangguran dan Kemiskinan dalam Masyarakat”. Kajian Vol. 21 No. 3 September 2016 hal. 221 - 236 (jurnal.dpr.go.id)
  4. Bhardwaj, Sanjeev. (2018). “Problems Of Unemployment In India And Its Solutions”. INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL DELIBERATIVE RESEARCH/Volume-37/Issue-37/Jan.-March, 2018
  5. Danim, Sudarwan. 2012. Motivasi Kepemimpinan dan Efektivitas Kelompok. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  6. Mahmudi, (2005). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta : UPP AMP
  7. Makmur. (2011). EfektivitasKelembagaan Pengawasan. Bandung: Refika Aditama
  8. Tangkilisan. (2005). Manajemen Publik, Jakarta: PT Grasindo
  9. Shomad, Abdul (2010). “Program Bantuan Langsung Tunai dalam Perspektif Public Choice di Kota Bekasi: Studi Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintahan Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono-Wakil Presiden Jusuf Kalla”, Depok: Tesis Universitas Indonesia
  10. Suharyadi, Asep dan Niken Kusumawardhani, Ridho Al Izzati. (2015). “Efektivitas Program Bantuan Sosial dalam Pengurangan Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan”. Bandung: The Smeru Institute
  11. Samuelson, P. A. dan W. D. Nordhaus. 2005. Ekonomics. New Y ork: McGraw Hill
  12. Reynolds, L.G., S.H. Masters and C.H. Moser. 1986. Labor Economics and Labor Relations. Ninth Edition. New Jersey : Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs
  13. Sukirno. 2004. Makroekonomi Teori Pengantar. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta : Penerbit Raja Grafindo Persada
  14. Sukirno, Sadono. 1985. Ekonomi Pembangunan. Jakarta : Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia
  15. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
  16. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan
  17. Sumber online:
  18. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2018/11/05/1485/agustus-2018--tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka--tpt--sebesar-5-34-persen.html
  19. https://www.jpnn.com/news/mendikbud-larang-smk-buka-jurusan-yang-tidak-dibutuhkan-industri
  20. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-47520226
  21. https://tirto.id/kartu-pra-kerja-jokowi-mudah-diucapkan-sulit-direalisasikan-diER
  22. https://www.merdeka.com/uang/mengupas-efektivitas-kartu-prakerja-milik-jokowi.html
  23. http://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/115639-problematik-kartu-indonesia-pintar
  24. https://www.antikorupsi.org/id/kajian/4-tahun-kartu-indonesia-pintar-masih-banyak-yang-salah-sasaran
  25. https://tirto.id/timses-jokowi-tekankan-kartu-pra-kerja-bukan-menggaji-pengangguran-djBF
  26. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1183826/jokowi-kartu-pra-kerja-bakal-dibagikan-ke-jutaan-orang-per-tahun/full&view=ok
  27. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/anggaran-cetak-kip-kis-dan-kks-dari-csr-bumn/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Last update: 2021-02-28 15:41:36

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-02-28 15:41:37

No citation recorded.