DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.5.1.1-19

VIKTIMISASI MAJEMUK (MULTIPLE VICTIMIZATION) ANAK-ANAK KORBAN PERCERAIAN

*Reza Indragiri Amriel  -  Universitas Bina Nusantara, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Divorce is commonly perceived as a traumatic event for children. However, it represents only one form of victimization experienced by children following parental separation. This article argues that children of divorced parents are exposed to three interconnected forms of victimization: the impact of divorce itself, secondary victimization resulting from inadequate judicial mechanisms in child custody decisions, and further victimization caused by parental misconduct, including parental alienation. Using an interdisciplinary normative approach, the study examines child custody from psychological, legal, and Islamic legal perspectives. It concludes that strengthening child-centered judicial mechanisms is essential to ensuring the best interests of the child and preventing repeated victimization.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Divorce; Child Victimization; Child Custody; Jurigenic Effect; Parental Alienation

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Most cited articles
Pembangunan Hukum Negara dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Perspektif Hukum Progresif Arsenal Hukum Progresif Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan More cited articles
  1. Amato, P.R. (2001). Children of Divorce in the 1990s: An Update of the Amato and Keith (1991) Meta-Analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 355-370
  2. Ackerman, M.J. (1999). Essentials of Forensic Psychological Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Son
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR); 4th ed., text revision. Washington, DC: Author
  4. Araji, S.K., & Bosek, R.L. (2010). Domestic Violence, Contested Child Custody, and the Courts: Findings From Five Studies. Dalam Mo, T.H. & Barry, G. Domestic Violence, Abuse, and Child Custody: Legal Strategies and Policy Issues (hal. 6.2-6.31). Kingston, New Jersey: Civic Research Institute, Inc
  5. Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Teknologi Informasi dan Implikasinya terhadap Hukum dan Pemerintahan. Dalam Zainal, A.M.H. (ed.), Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-pilar Demokrasi (Serpihan Pemikiran Hukum, Media dan HAM (hal. 145-161). Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
  6. Aughisbaugh, A., Pierret, C.R., & Rothstein, D.S. (2005). The Impact of Family Structure Transitions on Youth Achievement: Evidence from the Children of the NLSY79. Demography, 42, 447-468
  7. Bala, N., & Bailey, N. (2004/2005). Enforcement of access & alienation of children: Conflict reduction strategies & legal responses. Canada Family Law Quarterly, 23, 1-61
  8. Baron, S. (2003). The scope of family court intervention. Journal of the Center for Children and the Courts, 4, 115-129
  9. Barton, B.H. (2008). Judges, lawyers, and a predictive theory of legal complexity. Selected Works of Benjamin H. Barton – University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Diunduh dari http://works.bepress.com/benjamin_barton/2
  10. Barton, B.H. (2010). The lawyer-judge bias in the American Legal System. New York: Cambridge University Press
  11. Barton, T.D. (2010). Problem solving and prevention by general-jurisdiction judges. Court Review, 45 (4), 116-123
  12. Bender, W.N. & Brannon, L. (1994). Victimization of Non-Custodial Parents, Grandparents, and Children as a Function of Sole Custody. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 21(34), 81-114
  13. Benjamin, G.A.H., & Gollan, J. (2003). Family evaluation in custody litigation: Reducing risks of ethical infractions and malpractice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
  14. Bernet, W. (2010). Parental Alienation, DSM-V and ICD-11. New York: Routledge
  15. Bey, F. (2011). Scope of Contemporary Victimology. Dipresentasikan pada the 11th Asian Post Graduate Course on Victimology and Victim Assistance. Jakarta, 20 July
  16. Bow, J.N. & Quinnell, F.A. (2004). Critique of child custody evaluations by the legal profession. Family Court Review, 42 (1), 115-127
  17. Charrad, M.M. (2011). Gender in the Middle East: Islam, State, Agency. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 417-437
  18. Cherlin, A.J. (2008). Public & Private Families: An Introduction, 5th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill
  19. Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2010). Best Interest of the Child. Dikunjungi pada 19 July 2011 from http://www.childwelfare.org
  20. Clawar, S.S., & Rivlin, B.V. (1991). Children held hostage: Dealing with programmed and brainwashed children. Chicago: American Bar Association
  21. Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. (2011). Data Perbandingan Faktor-faktor Terbesar Penyebab Terjadinya Perceraian Mahkamah Syar’iyah/Pengadilan Agama Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Syar’iyah Provinsi/Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Seluruh Indonesia Tahun 2005 -2010
  22. Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. Diadopsi oleh Resolusi Majelis Umum PBB 40/34 of 29 November 1985
  23. Farkas, M.M. (2011). An introduction to parental alienation. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services, 49 (4), 20-26
  24. Felner, R.D., & Terre, L. (1987). Child custody dispositions and children’s adaptation following divorce. Dalam L.A. Weithorn (Ed.), Psychology and child custody determinations: Knowledge, roles, and expertise (hal. 106-153). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
  25. Finklehor, D. & Hashima, P.Y. (2001). The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive overview. In K. White (Eds). Handbook of Youth and Justice. New York: Plenum Publishers
  26. Freud, S. (1949). An Outline of Psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton
  27. Furstenberg, C. & Cherlin, A. (1991). Divided families: What happens to children when parents part. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
  28. Galatzer-Levy, R., & Kraus, L. (1999). The Scientific Basis of Child Custody Decisions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
  29. Gardner, R.A. (1999, April-June). Differentiating Between Parental Alienation Syndrome and Bona Fide Abuse-Neglect. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 27(2), 97-107
  30. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1973). Beyond the Best Interests of the Child. New York: Free Press
  31. Gray, M.T. (2010). Historical Legal Context in Domestic Violence Custody Cases. Dalam Mo, T.H. & Barry, G. Domestic Violence, Abuse, and Child Custody: Legal Strategies and Policy Issues (hal. 3.2-3.37). Kingston, New Jersey: Civic Research Institute, Inc
  32. Hanson, T.L (1999). Does Parental Conflict Explain Why Divorce is Negatively Associated with Child Welfare? Social Forces, 77, 1283-1316
  33. Hardcastle, G.W. (2005). Adversarialism and the family court: A family court judge’s perspective. UC Davis Journal of Juvenile Law and Policy, 9 (1), 57-125
  34. Instruksi Presiden No. 1 tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam
  35. Joni, M. (2006). Hak-hak Anak dalam UU Perlindungan Anak dan Konvensi PBB tentang Hak Anak: Beberapa Isu Hukum Keluarga [Child’s Rights According to the Law on Child Protection and the UN Convention on Child’s Rights: Some Issues regarding Family Law]. Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Perlindungan Anak [National Commission on Child Protection]
  36. Kelly, J.B. (2002). The Determination of Child Custody in the USA. Diunduh dari http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/spca/pg/library pada 21 November 2011
  37. Kim, H. S. (2011). Consequences of Parental Divorce for Child Development. American Sociological Review, 76 (3), 487-511
  38. Lifeline Community Care Queensland. (2010). Children and Families. Dikunjungi pada 19 September 2011 dari http://www.iccq.or.au/family-relationships-separation-and-divorce
  39. Lings, M / al-Din, A.B.S. (2008). Muhammad: Kisah Hidup Nabi Berdasarkan Sumber Klasik. Jakarta: PT. Serambi Ilmu Semesta
  40. Lorandos, D. (2006). Parental Alienation Syndrome in American Law. In R. Gardner, D. Lorandos & S.R. Sauber (Eds.), The International Handbook on Parental Alienation Syndrome: Conceptual, Clinical, and Legal Considerations (hal. 90-120). Springfield, IL.: Charles C. Thomas Publishers
  41. Lovegrove, A. (1997). The Framework of Judicial Sentencing: A Study in Legal Decision Making. New York: Cambridge University Press
  42. Maekoya, C. (2011). Victims of Child Abuse. Dipresentasikan pada the 11th Asian Post Graduate Course on Victimology and Victim Assistance. Jakarta, 20 July
  43. Major, J.A. (2009). Parental Alienation Syndrome: Its Causes, Cures, Costs, and Controversies. Diunduh pada 20 November 2011 dari http://www.majorfamilyservices.com/parental-alienation-syndrome-pas-its-causes-cures-costs-and-controversies.html
  44. Ross, C.J. (1998, Spring). The Failure of Fragmentation: The Promise of a System of Unified Family Courts. Family Law Quarterly, 32(1), 3-30
  45. Roth, A. (1976-77). The Tender Years Presumption in Child Custody Disputes. Journal of Family Law, 15, 423-461
  46. Schma, W.G. (2003, Januari). Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Michigan Bar Journal, 25-27
  47. Shihab, U. (2008). Pengaturan Hak Asuh dan Penerapannya – Sebuah Pandangan tentang Konsep Hak Asuh dalam Islam, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Peran Hakim dalam Penentuan Hak Asuh. Tidak diterbitkan
  48. Sigle-Rushton, W., Hobcraft, J., & Kiernan, K. (2005). Parental Divorce and Subsequent Disadvantage: A Cross-Cohort Comparison. Demography, 42, 427-446
  49. Stahl, P.M. (1994). Conducting child custody evaluations: A comprehensive guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  50. Tihami, H.M.A. & Sahrani, S. (2009). Fikih Munakahat – Kajian Fikih Nikah Lengkap. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  51. Town, M.A. (1997). The Unified Family Court: Preventive, Therapeutic and Restorative Justice For America’s Families. Diunduh pada 3 September 2011 dari http://www.preventivelawyer.org
  52. Turkat, I.D. (2005). On the limitations of child-custody evaluations. Court Review, 42 (2), 8-13
  53. Turkat, I.D. (2006). False allegations of parental alienation. American Journal of Family Law, 19 (1), 15-19
  54. Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (1997)
  55. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak
  56. Walker, N.E., Brooks, C.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1998). Children’s rights in the United States: In search of a national policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  57. Wesley, K.A. (2000). Parental conflict, divorce, and victimization: How do these family-of-origin experiences affect the relationship cognitions of college students. University of South Alabama. Theses
  58. Wrightsman, L.S., & Fulero, S.M. (2005). Forensic Psychology, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-17 14:07:27

No citation recorded.