BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JHP76865, author = {Agnes Fitryantica and Roqiyul Maarif Syam}, title = {BRIDGING POLICY AND LAW: HARMONIZING THE NATIONAL MEDIUM-TERM DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE IN INDONESIA}, journal = {Jurnal Hukum Progresif}, volume = {13}, number = {2}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Legal Harmonization; National Development Planning; Legislative Alignment; Policy Consistency; Governance Accountability}, abstract = { This study examines the integration of the National Medium-Term Development Plan and the National Legislation Program in Indonesia, highlighting the impact of misalignment on public policy consistency, governance, and legal legitimacy. The National Medium-Term Development Plan serves as a strategic guideline for achieving long-term development objectives, while the Prolegnas functions as a legal framework for enacting laws that support these objectives. Despite their complementary roles, inconsistencies often occur due to weak coordination among planning institutions, legislative bodies, and technical ministries. Such discontinuities result in overlapping, contradictory, or unimplemented regulations, undermining government accountability and public trust. Using doctrinal legal research and normative analysis of relevant laws, including Law No. 25 of 2004 on the National Development Planning System and Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Laws and Regulations, the study identifies gaps in harmonization between development planning and legislative processes. Empirical evidence demonstrates that certain legislative agendas, such as the Job Creation Law and sectoral bills, are often formulated without direct reference to national development priorities, reflecting a disconnect between policy and legal instruments. To address these challenges, the study proposes a reconstruction model emphasizing substantive and procedural harmonization. Key strategies include policy–regulation mapping, identification of legal needs based on development priorities, annual updates of legislative programs, and active public participation in policy evaluation. Harmonization ensures vertical and horizontal alignment across sectors, promotes legal certainty, and enhances governance efficiency. By integrating development planning with legislative processes, the government can achieve systematic, consistent, and legally supported implementation of national programs. Ultimately, this integration strengthens transparency, accountability, and public trust, contributing to Indonesia’s long-term development vision, Golden Indonesia 2045. }, issn = {2655-6081}, pages = {226--252} doi = {10.14710/jhp.13.2.226-252}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/hukum_progresif/article/view/76865} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This study examines the integration of the National Medium-Term Development Plan and the National Legislation Program in Indonesia, highlighting the impact of misalignment on public policy consistency, governance, and legal legitimacy. The National Medium-Term Development Plan serves as a strategic guideline for achieving long-term development objectives, while the Prolegnas functions as a legal framework for enacting laws that support these objectives. Despite their complementary roles, inconsistencies often occur due to weak coordination among planning institutions, legislative bodies, and technical ministries. Such discontinuities result in overlapping, contradictory, or unimplemented regulations, undermining government accountability and public trust. Using doctrinal legal research and normative analysis of relevant laws, including Law No. 25 of 2004 on the National Development Planning System and Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Laws and Regulations, the study identifies gaps in harmonization between development planning and legislative processes. Empirical evidence demonstrates that certain legislative agendas, such as the Job Creation Law and sectoral bills, are often formulated without direct reference to national development priorities, reflecting a disconnect between policy and legal instruments. To address these challenges, the study proposes a reconstruction model emphasizing substantive and procedural harmonization. Key strategies include policy–regulation mapping, identification of legal needs based on development priorities, annual updates of legislative programs, and active public participation in policy evaluation. Harmonization ensures vertical and horizontal alignment across sectors, promotes legal certainty, and enhances governance efficiency. By integrating development planning with legislative processes, the government can achieve systematic, consistent, and legally supported implementation of national programs. Ultimately, this integration strengthens transparency, accountability, and public trust, contributing to Indonesia’s long-term development vision, Golden Indonesia 2045.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-07-14 13:01:58
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Jurnal Hukum ProgresifDoctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas DiponegoroJalan Imam Bardjo, S.H., No.1, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, IndonesiaEmail: hukumprogresif@live.undip.ac.idWebsite: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/hukum_progresif/index
Visitor Statisics