skip to main content

DEVELOPMENT OF PANCASILA AS SCIENCE ETHICS: STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME NEGATIVE IMPACT TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT

*Iriyanto Widisuseno scopus  -  Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 HUMANIKA under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This research is a reflection of concern over the negative impacts that are increasingly prevalent due to the development of science and technology (IPTEK). To overcome these negative impacts, scientific ethics are needed that can build ethical behavior in the development of science and technology in accordance with the culture of the Indonesian nation. The purpose of this study is to examine the development of Pancasila as a scientific ethic. This study uses a philosophical phenomenological method that is supported by library reference sources and authentic observations. The results of the study show that the development of science and technology requires scientific ethics. Pancasila fulfills the requirements to be developed as a scientific ethic, because all of the Pancasila precepts are an organic unity, contain basic values that have long been believed to be guidelines and even the Indonesian people's view of life, contain basic values that shape the character and behavior of the Indonesian nation, namely religious, humane, nationalist, democratic and just.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Pancasila; scientific ethics; development of science and technology; the Indonesian nation

Article Metrics:

  1. Abd Haris (2007). Pengantar Etika Islam. Al-Afkar. Sidoarjo
  2. Asmaran (1999). Pengantar Studi Akhlak, Lembaga Studi Islam dan Kemasyarakatan,
  3. Jakarta
  4. Bertens, K. (2007). Seri Filsafat: Etika, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta
  5. Badan Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa (2022). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia,
  6. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi. Jakarta
  7. Dua, M.(2011). Kebebasan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi, Kanisius, Jogjakarta
  8. Firman, H. (1989). Pendidikan sains bermuatan nilai, Mimbar Pendidikan
  9. Golinski, Jan (2001). Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of
  10. Science (edisi ke-reprint). University of Chicago Press
  11. Istighfarotur, Rahmaniyah (2010). Pendidikan Etika Konsep Jiwa dan Etika Prespektif
  12. Ibnu Maskawaih, Aditya Media, Malang
  13. Miller, G. T. (1982. Living in The Environment. Wardswarth Publish- ing Company,
  14. Belmont, California
  15. Suriasumantri, Y.S. (2009). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Pustaka
  16. Sinar Harapan, Jakarta
  17. Sutardjo (1992). Problematika Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi,
  18. Tarsito, Bandung
  19. Sumanto (2014). Psikologi Umum, CAPS, Yogyakarta
  20. The Liang Gie (2004). Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu, , Liberty Cet. VI, Yogyakarta
  21. Yacob, T. (1988). Manusia, Ilmu dan Teknologi, PT. Tiara Wacana, Yogyakarta
  22. Vos, de H. (Alih Bahasa: Soejono Soemargo). 1987. Pengantar Etika. PT. Tiara Wacana,
  23. Yogyakarta
  24. Van Peursen (1987). Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Tanggungjawab Ilmuwan, Kanisius,
  25. Yogyakarta
  26. Widisuseno, Iriyanto (2017). Etika Taoisme dan Implementasinya, Undip Press,
  27. Semarang
  28. Widisuseno, Iriyanto (2018) Teori Pertumbuhan Pengetahuan Ilmiah Karl R. Popper,
  29. Undip Press, Semarang
  30. Widisuseno, Iriyanto, 2013. Peran Filsafat dalam Mengatasi Persoalan dalam
  31. Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi di Indonesia, UNDIP
  32. Press, Semarang
  33. Widisuseno, Iriyanto, (2021). Modul Filsafat dan Metode Ilmu Pengetahuan, Undip
  34. Press, Semarang

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-17 04:06:09

No citation recorded.