1Program Pascasarjana Teknologi Kelautan, IPB-Bogor, Indonesia
2Jurusan Perikanan, FPIK-UNDIP. Jl. Hayam Wuruk 4A Semarang-50241, Indonesia
3Telp-Fax. 024-8313759, 024-8311525. Email: adpf2004@yahoo.com, Indonesia
4 Dept. Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, FPIK-IPB. Jl. Agatis, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor. Telp-Fax. 0251-622935, 0251-625961. Email: aripy@indo.net.id, Indonesia
5 Dept. Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan, FPIK-IPB. Jl. Agatis, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor. Telp-Fax. 0251-622915, 0251-622916. Email: joko2209@yahoo.com, Indonesia
6 Dept. Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, FPIK-IPB. Jl. Agatis, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor. Telp-Fax. 0251-622935, 0251-625961, Indonesia
7 Dept. Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, FPIK-IPB. Jl. Agatis, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor. Telp-Fax. 0251-622935, 0251-625961
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{IK.IJMS2320, author = {Aristi Dian and Purbayanto Ari and Joko Santoso and Mulyono Baskoro and Daniel Monintja}, title = {Respon Tingkah Laku Makan Ikan Kerapu Macan (Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus) Terhadap Komposisi Kimia Umpan}, journal = {ILMU KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences}, volume = {12}, number = {3}, year = {2012}, keywords = {}, abstract = { Studi tingkah laku makan ikan merupakan bagian yang paling penting untuk mengetahui efektivitas penggunaan umpan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui respon dan pola tingkah laku makan ikan kerapu macan (Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus) dengan perbedaan komposisi kimia umpan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode eksperimen laboratorium. E. fuscoguttatus yang digunakan memiliki panjang total rata-rata 200 mm. Umpan yang digunakan adalah udang krosok (Metapenaeus elegans) dan ikan rucah (Sardinella gibbosa). Data penelitian meliputi waktu respon dan pola tingkah laku makan E. fuscoguttatus terhadap umpan dengan lama perendaman 1, 7 dan 12 jam. Komposisi kimia masing-masing umpan dianalisis berdasarkan lama waktu perendaman. Data diuji dengan menggunakan analisis statistik t student (uji-t). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan waktu respon E. Fuscoguttatus terhadap umpan udang krosok dan ikan rucah tidak berbeda nyata (nilai t hitung 2,25). Respon makan E. fuscoguttatus dengan perbedaan waktu perendaman umpan udang krosok dan ikan rucah selama 1 jam dan 7 jam berbeda sangat nyata (nilai t- hitung 3,85 dan 5,70). Lama waktu perendaman umpan 12 jam tidak berbeda nyata (nilai t hitung 0,86). Semakin lama waktu perendaman umpan (hingga 12 jam) terjadi penurunan komposisi kimia sehingga berpengaruh pula terhadap menurunnya respon makan E. fuscoguttatus. Kata kunci: Komposisi kimia umpan, pola tingkah laku makan, ikan kerapu macan (Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus ) Fish behavior study is necessary to know the use of bait effectiveness. This research objective was to analyze response and feeding behavior of grouper ( Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus ) with difference of the bait chemical composition. The research was conducted by laboratory experimental method. The fish used was 200 mm total length in average. The baits used were shrimp ( Metapenaeus elegans ) and trash fish ( Sardinella gibbosa ). Data collection consist of response time and feeding behavior pattern of E. fuscoguttatus towards bait with soaking time of 1, 7, and 12 hours. Chemical composition of each baits was analysis based on soaking time. Data was statistical analyzed using t- student test. The result showed that response time of E. fuscoguttatus to shrimp bait and fish was insignificantly difference (t-value was 2.25). The feeding response of E. fuscoguttatus with soaking time difference of shrimp bait and trash fish during 1 and 7 hours was significantly difference (t-value was 3.85 and 5.70). The bait soaking time until 12 hours was insignificantly difference (t-value was 0.86). The longer bait soaking time (until 12 hours) would decrease the bait chemical composition that influenced to decrease feeding response of E. fuscoguttatus. Key words: Chemical composition of baits, feeding behavior, Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus }, issn = {2406-7598}, pages = {133--138} doi = {10.14710/ik.ijms.12.3.133-138}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijms/article/view/2320} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Studi tingkah laku makan ikan merupakan bagian yang paling penting untuk mengetahui efektivitas penggunaan umpan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui respon dan pola tingkah laku makan ikan kerapu macan (Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus) dengan perbedaan komposisi kimia umpan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode eksperimen laboratorium. E. fuscoguttatus yang digunakan memiliki panjang total rata-rata 200 mm. Umpan yang digunakan adalah udang krosok (Metapenaeus elegans) dan ikan rucah (Sardinella gibbosa). Data penelitian meliputi waktu respon dan pola tingkah laku makan E. fuscoguttatus terhadap umpan dengan lama perendaman 1, 7 dan 12 jam. Komposisi kimia masing-masing umpan dianalisis berdasarkan lama waktu perendaman. Data diuji dengan menggunakan analisis statistik t student (uji-t). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan waktu respon E. Fuscoguttatus terhadap umpan udang krosok dan ikan rucah tidak berbeda nyata (nilai thitung 2,25). Respon makan E. fuscoguttatus dengan perbedaan waktu perendaman umpan udang krosok dan ikan rucah selama 1 jam dan 7 jam berbeda sangat nyata (nilai t-hitung 3,85 dan 5,70). Lama waktu perendaman umpan 12 jam tidak berbeda nyata (nilai thitung 0,86). Semakin lama waktu perendaman umpan (hingga 12 jam) terjadi penurunan komposisi kimia sehingga berpengaruh pula terhadap menurunnya respon makan E. fuscoguttatus.
Kata kunci: Komposisi kimia umpan, pola tingkah laku makan, ikan kerapu macan (Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus)
Fish behavior study is necessary to know the use of bait effectiveness. This research objective was to analyze response and feeding behavior of grouper (Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus) with difference of the bait chemical composition. The research was conducted by laboratory experimental method. The fish used was 200 mm total length in average. The baits used were shrimp (Metapenaeus elegans) and trash fish (Sardinella gibbosa). Data collection consist of response time and feeding behavior pattern of E. fuscoguttatus towards bait with soaking time of 1, 7, and 12 hours. Chemical composition of each baits was analysis based on soaking time. Data was statistical analyzed using t- student test. The result showed that response time of E. fuscoguttatus to shrimp bait and fish was insignificantly difference (t-value was 2.25). The feeding response of E. fuscoguttatus with soaking time difference of shrimp bait and trash fish during 1 and 7 hours was significantly difference (t-value was 3.85 and 5.70). The bait soaking time until 12 hours was insignificantly difference (t-value was 0.86). The longer bait soaking time (until 12 hours) would decrease the bait chemical composition that influenced to decrease feeding response of E. fuscoguttatus.
Key words: Chemical composition of baits, feeding behavior, Ephinephelus fuscoguttatus
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-04-16 23:39:50
Copy this form and after filling it, please send it to ijms@live.undip.ac.id:
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER STATEMENT
When this article is accepted for publication, its copyright is transferred to ILMU KELAUTAN Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences, UNDIP. The copyright transfer covers the non exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this article is original and that the author has full power to publish. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. In regard to all kind of plagiarism in this manuscript, if any, only the author(s) will take full responsibility. If the article is based on or part of student’s skripsi, thesis or dissertation, the student needs to sign as his/her agreement that his/her works is going to be published.
Title of article :...........................................................................................................................Name of Author(s) :...........................................................................................................................Author’s signature :...........................................................................................................................Date :...........................................................................................................................
