1Department of Marine Technology, Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Pangandaran, Indonesia
2Department of Structural Engineering, Asiatek Energi Mitratama, Indonesia
3Departement of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universuitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
4 Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Islamic University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh
5 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
6 Assistant Professor IV, Visayas State University, Philippines
7 Research Institute, STKIP Muhammadiyah OKU Timur, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{IK.IJMS54074, author = {Lulut Alfaris and Anas Firdaus and Ukta Nyuswantoro and Ruben Siagian and Aldi Muhammad and Rohana Hassan and Rodulfo Aunzo, Jr. and Reza Ariefka}, title = {Predicting Ocean Current Temperature Off the East Coast of America with XGBoost and Random Forest Algorithms Using Rstudio}, journal = {ILMU KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences}, volume = {29}, number = {2}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Forecasting; Machine learning methods; Model performance metrics; Predictive accuracy}, abstract = { This research investigates the comparative predictive efficacy of two leading machine learning methodologies, specifically the XGBoost and Random Forest models, in estimating ocean temperature dynamics in the TS Gulf Stream and Labrador Current regions along the east coast of North America. Using annual temperature datasets and relevant oceanographic parameters, the data is carefully processed, cleaned and sorted into training and test subsets via the RStudio Platform. The performance evaluation model is carried out using predetermined machine learning assessment criteria, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and R-squared. The results show the superiority of the XGBoost model compared to Random Forest in terms of prediction accuracy and minimizing prediction errors. The XGBoost model shows lower MSE values and higher R-squared values than the Random Forest model, indicating its better capacity in explaining data variations. XGBoost consistently provides more accurate predictions and shows higher sensitivity in identifying important factors influencing ocean temperature fluctuations than Random Forest. This research significantly improves understanding and prognostic capabilities regarding ocean temperature dynamics in the TS Gulf Stream and Labrador Current regions. Empirical evidence underlines the efficacy of the XGBoost model in predicting ocean temperatures in the studied region. Continuous model evaluation and parameter refinement for both methodologies is critical to establishing standards for optimal prediction performance. The findings of this research have implications for the fields of oceanography and climate science, and offer potential pathways to comprehensively understand and mitigate the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems. }, issn = {2406-7598}, pages = {273--284} doi = {10.14710/ik.ijms.29.2.273-284}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijms/article/view/54074} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This research investigates the comparative predictive efficacy of two leading machine learning methodologies, specifically the XGBoost and Random Forest models, in estimating ocean temperature dynamics in the TS Gulf Stream and Labrador Current regions along the east coast of North America. Using annual temperature datasets and relevant oceanographic parameters, the data is carefully processed, cleaned and sorted into training and test subsets via the RStudio Platform. The performance evaluation model is carried out using predetermined machine learning assessment criteria, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and R-squared. The results show the superiority of the XGBoost model compared to Random Forest in terms of prediction accuracy and minimizing prediction errors. The XGBoost model shows lower MSE values and higher R-squared values than the Random Forest model, indicating its better capacity in explaining data variations. XGBoost consistently provides more accurate predictions and shows higher sensitivity in identifying important factors influencing ocean temperature fluctuations than Random Forest. This research significantly improves understanding and prognostic capabilities regarding ocean temperature dynamics in the TS Gulf Stream and Labrador Current regions. Empirical evidence underlines the efficacy of the XGBoost model in predicting ocean temperatures in the studied region. Continuous model evaluation and parameter refinement for both methodologies is critical to establishing standards for optimal prediction performance. The findings of this research have implications for the fields of oceanography and climate science, and offer potential pathways to comprehensively understand and mitigate the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-12-25 20:51:58
Copy this form and after filling it, please send it to ijms@live.undip.ac.id:
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER STATEMENT
When this article is accepted for publication, its copyright is transferred to ILMU KELAUTAN Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences, UNDIP. The copyright transfer covers the non exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this article is original and that the author has full power to publish. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. In regard to all kind of plagiarism in this manuscript, if any, only the author(s) will take full responsibility. If the article is based on or part of student’s skripsi, thesis or dissertation, the student needs to sign as his/her agreement that his/her works is going to be published.
Title of article :...........................................................................................................................Name of Author(s) :...........................................................................................................................Author’s signature :...........................................................................................................................Date :...........................................................................................................................
View My Stats