DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.23.2.578-584

Decentralization of Local Government Authority to Village Governments in Domestic Waste Management: A Case Study of Temanggung Regency

1Magister Environmental Science, School of Postgraduate Studies, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

2Cluster Research for Green Infrastructure Resilience Development, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

3Departemen Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

4 Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 23 Oct 2024; Revised: 23 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Mar 2025; Available online: 15 Mar 2025; Published: 31 Mar 2025.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Waste management is a major environmental challenge in Indonesia. With the increasing volume of waste due to urbanization and population growth, waste management capacity is limited. This research explores the Temanggung district government's efforts to implement a decentralized waste management policy involving village governments and communities. Through the policy that started in 2019, waste management coverage increased significantly from 30.7% in 2018 to 70.9% in 2023, with villages playing an active role in waste reduction. This research uses in-depth interviews, observation, and document review methods to understand the decentralization policy's implementation process and the challenges faced in its implementation. The results show that decentralization contributes to improving the effectiveness of waste management in Temanggung and can be an alternative solution to be implemented in other regions in Indonesia.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Waste Management; Decentralization; Local Village Government

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Keanekaragaman dan Potensi Tumbuhan Bawah sebagai Pakan Ternak pada Lahan Kelapa Sawit Menghasilkan Dry Landslide in Sarwodadi Village, Pejawaran Sub-Regency; An Untypical Landslide in Banjarnegara Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia Penentuan Indeks Kesehatan Laut Berdasarkan Parameter Oseanografi di Perairan Kabupaten Sambas More recent articles
Most cited articles
STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN AIR LIMBAH SENTRA UMKM BATIK YANG BERKELANJUTAN DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENATAAN SANITASI PERKOTAAN MELALUI PROGRAM SANITASI LINGKUNGAN BERBASIS MASYARAKAT DI KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG Evaluasi Penerapan Program Adiwiyata Untuk Membentuk Perilaku Peduli Lingkungan di Kalangan Siswa (Kasus: SMA Negeri 9 Tangerang Selatan dan MA Negeri 1 Serpong) PENGARUH EMISI UDARA PADA SENTRA PENGOLAHAN BATU KAPUR TERHADAP KAPASITAS VITAL PARU PEKERJA DAN MASYARAKAT DI DESA KARAS KECAMATAN SEDAN KABUPATEN REMBANG HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN DAN ETIKA LINGKUNGAN DENGAN SIKAP DAN PERILAKU MENJAGA KELESTARIAN LINGKUNGAN More cited articles
  1. Alsabt, R., Alkhaldi, W., Adenle, Y. A., & Alshuwaikhat, H. M. (2024). Optimizing waste management strategies through artificial intelligence and machine learning - An economic and environmental impact study. Cleaner Waste Systems, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100158
  2. Badan Statistik Indonesia. (2021). Statistik Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia
  3. Benz, A. (n.d.). Policy coordination between different levels of government: What have we learned from Canada-Europe comparative research?
  4. Creswell. (2019). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
  5. Cumming, D., Drobetz, W., Momtaz, P. P., & Schermann, N. (2025). Financing decentralized digital platform growth: The role of crypto funds in blockchain-based startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106450
  6. Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
  7. Etim, E. (2024). Bridging the gap: Transforming waste management awareness into action. Cleaner Waste Systems, 9, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100173
  8. Gollakota, A. R. K., Gautam, S., & Shu, C. M. (2020). Inconsistencies of e-waste management in developing nations – Facts and plausible solutions. In Journal of Environmental Management (Vol. 261). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110234
  9. Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction
  10. Hoornweg, D. (2012). What a waste: a global review of solid waste management Perinaz Bhada-Tata. www.worldbank.org/urban
  11. Jiang, Y., Leng, B., & Xi, J. (2024). Assessing the social cost of municipal solid waste management in Beijing: A systematic life cycle analysis. Waste Management, 173, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.11.004
  12. Kozová, M., Dobšinská, Z., Pauditšová, E., Tomčíková, I., & Rakytová, I. (2018). Network and participatory governance in urban forestry: An assessment of examples from selected Slovakian cities. Forest Policy and Economics, 89, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.016
  13. Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (n.d.). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers
  14. Lexy J. Moleong. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  15. Menon, V. J., & Palackal, A. (2022). CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED APPROACHES TO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT – A CASE STUDY. Holistic Approach to Environment, 12(4), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.33765/thate.12.4.3
  16. Nemat, B., Razzaghi, M., Bolton, K., & Rousta, K. (2022). Design affordance of plastic food packaging for consumer sorting behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105949
  17. Okot-Okumu, J., & Nyenje, R. (2011). Municipal solid waste management under decentralisation in Uganda. Habitat International, 35(4), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.003
  18. Pai, S., Ai, N., & Zheng, J. (2019). Decentralized community composting feasibility analysis for residential food waste: A Chicago case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101683
  19. Pemerintah Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2008 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah
  20. Pemerintah Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemeritah Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga
  21. Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014a). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa
  22. Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014b). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah
  23. Pemerintah Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 97 Tahun 2017 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga
  24. Pemerintah Kabupaten Temanggung. (2023a). Peraturan Bupati Nomor 42 Tahun 2024 tentang Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Sampah
  25. Pemerintah Kabupaten Temanggung. (2023b). Peraturan Bupati Nomor 43 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pengelolaan Sampah Desa
  26. Pemerintah Kabupaten Temanggung. (2023c). Rencana Induk Pengelolaan Sampah Kabupaten Temanggung Judul
  27. Pietzsch, N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & de Medeiros, J. F. (2017). Benefits, challenges and critical factors of success for Zero Waste: A systematic literature review. In Waste Management (Vol. 67, pp. 324–353). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.004
  28. Pitakaso, R., Srichok, T., Khonjun, S., Golinska-Dawson, P., Sethanan, K., Nanthasamroeng, N., Gonwirat, S., Luesak, P., & Boonmee, C. (2024). Optimization-driven artificial intelligence-enhanced municipal waste classification system for disaster waste management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108614
  29. Rodić, L., & Wilson, D. C. (2017). Resolving governance issues to achieve priority sustainable development goals related to solid waste management in developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030404
  30. Serrona, K. R. B., Yu, J., Aguinaldo, E., & Florece, L. M. (2014). Developing a monitoring and evaluation framework to integrate and formalize the informal waste and recycling sector: The case of the Philippine National Framework Plan. Waste Management and Research, 32(9), 882–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14542146
  31. Vehovar, V., Toepoel, V., & Steinmetz, S. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology
  32. Vince, J., Fudge, M., Fullbrook, L., & Haward, M. (2024). Understanding policy integration through an integrative capacity framework. Policy and Society, 43(3), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae027
  33. Wang, S., Bai, X., van der Heijden, J., & Tong, X. (2024). The evolving roles of actors in sustainability experiments: Evidence from community waste management in a Chinese city. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123469
  34. Yuan, Z., & Shen, C. (2024). How citizens’ information framing enhances government responsiveness for urban sustainable development? Evidence from China’s air pollution governance. Sustainable Cities and Society, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105586
  35. Zurbrügg, C., Caniato, M., & Vaccari, M. (2014). How assessment methods can support solid waste management in developing countries-a critical review. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 545–570). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6020545

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-04-01 02:41:02

No citation recorded.