skip to main content

The Assessment of Paddy Soil Fertility Status Based Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX) in Tuban Indonesia

1Department of Fisheries and Marine Resources, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Brawijaya University, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur 65145, Indonesia

2Graduate School of Life Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Japan, Japan

Received: 27 Nov 2024; Revised: 27 Oct 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025; Available online: 16 Dec 2025; Published: 31 Dec 2025.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Rice is one of the main agricultural commodities cultivated by farmers in Tuban Regency, Indonesia. To improve rice productivity, evaluating soil fertility is essential for determining appropriate and balanced fertilization. This study aimed to assess the fertility status of paddy soils in Tuban Regency using the Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX) method to identify nutrient constraints and recommend suitable management practices. Soil samples were collected from agricultural areas integrated with organic farming systems. The results showed low bacterial number and weak nitrogen and phosphorus circulation activities. Chemical parameters, including total carbon, total potassium, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus, were also below optimal levels. These findings indicate that the paddy soils in Tuban Regency are in a low-fertility condition. Therefore, the application of organic materials is recommended to enhance microbial activity, improve nutrient cycling, and restore soil fertility for sustainable rice production.

Keywords: paddy soil; Soil fertility; organic materials; SOFIX

Article Metrics:

  1. Adhikari, D., Kai, T., Mukai, M., Araki, K.S. and Kubo, M. 2014. A New Proposal for a Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX) for Organic Agriculture and Development of a SOFIX Database for Agricultural Fields. Current Topics in Biotechnology, 8: 81-91
  2. Alori, E.T, Glick BR and Babalola, O.O. 2017. Microbial Phosphorus Solubilization and Its Potential for Use in Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 8:971. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971
  3. Aoshima H., Kimura A., Shibutani A., Okada C., Matsumiya Y., Kubo M. 2006. Evaluation of soil bacterial biomass using environmental DNA extracted by slow-stirring method. App. Micro. and Biotech: 71, 875-880
  4. Babur, E. 2018. Effects of parent material on soil microbial biomass carbon and basal respiration within young afforested areas. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34. 94-101. Doi: 10.1080/02827581.2018.1561936
  5. Bashagaluke, J.B., Logah, V., Opoku, A., Sarkodie-Addo, J., Quansah C. 2018. Soil nutrient loss through erosion: Impact of different cropping systems and soil amendments in Ghana. PLoS One, 19;13 (12): e0208250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208250
  6. Bowo, P., Nurayati, A. 2016. Analysis of Competitiveness and Government Policy on Rice, Corn and Soybean Farming in Central Java Province. JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan, 9(2): 159-169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v9i2.7623
  7. Haque, M.M.; Datta, J.; Ahmed, T., Ehsanullah, M., Karim, M.N., Akter, M.S., Iqbal, M.A., Baazeem, A., Hadifa, A., Ahmed, S., EL Sabagh, A. 2021. Organic Amendments Boost Soil Fertility and Rice Productivity and Reduce Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields under Sub-Tropical Conditions. Sustainability, 13, 3103. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063103
  8. Issifou, A., Michel-Pierre, F., David, H. 2022. Role of soil minerals on organic phosphorus availability and phosphorus uptake by plants. Geoderma, 428, 2022, 116125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116125
  9. Kai, T. , Nishimori, S. and Tamaki, M. 2020. Effect of Organic and Chemical Fertilizer Application on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Small-Sized Tomatoes. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, 9: 121-133. doi: 10.4236/jacen.2020.93011
  10. Li Q, Yang J, He G, Liu X, Zhang D. 2022. Characteristics of soil C:N:P stoichiometry and enzyme activities in different grassland types in Qilian Mountain nature reserve-Tibetan Plateau. PLoS One, 14;17(7):e0271399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271399
  11. Morgan, J. B. & Connolly, E. L. 2013. Plant-Soil Interactions: Nutrient Uptake. Nature Education Knowledge 4(8):2
  12. Pandit, K., Balla, M. 2006. An Assessment of soil Fertility Management Issues in Pokhare Khola Watershed, Dhading. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, 7: 89-96. 10.3126/njst.v7i0.578
  13. Pholkaw, P., Muraji, A., Maeda, K., Kawagoe, T., Kubota, K., Sanpa, S., Tran, Q.T. and Kubo, M. 2019. Utilization of Wood Biomass for Organic Soil Based on the Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX). Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, 8: 224-236. https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2019.8417
  14. Pholkaw, P., Tran, Q., Kai, T., Kawagoe, T., Kubota, K., Araki, K. and Kubo, M. 2020. Characterization of Orchard Fields Based on Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX). Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, 9: 159-176. doi: 10.4236/jacen.2020.93014
  15. Ratnasari., Jesica Ayu Dwi. 2021. Analisis Kinerja Pasar Benih Padi Di Kabupaten Tuban Provinsi Jawa Timur. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya
  16. Sasongko, Purnomo Edi et al. 2022. Assessment of soil fertility using the soil fertility index method on several land uses in Tutur District, Pasuruan Regency of East Java. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 10 (1): 3787-3794, oct. 2022. ISSN 2502-2458. Available at: doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2022.101.3787
  17. Sutardi., Apriyana., Yayan et al. 2022. The Transformation of Rice Crop Technology in Indonesia: Innovation and Sustainable Food Security. Agronomy, 13. 1. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010001
  18. Tan, Zhengxi., Lal, Rattan., Wiebe, Keith. 2005. Global Soil Nutrient Depletion and Yield Reduction. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v26n01_10
  19. Tibbett, M., Fraser, T.D., Duddigan, S. 2020. Identifying potential threats to soil biodiversity. PeerJ, 12;8:e9271. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9271

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-05-31 07:54:03

No citation recorded.