skip to main content

Microbiological Assessment of Escherichia coli Contamination in Branded and Unbranded Soy Milk Sold at Bandungan Market, Semarang Regency, Indonesia

Department of Environmental Health, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Received: 20 Oct 2025; Revised: 4 Jul 2026; Accepted: 6 Jul 2026; Available online: 16 Jul 2026; Published: 18 Jul 2026.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract
Soy milk is a plant-based beverage widely consumed as an alternative to cow's milk because of its nutritional value. However, inadequate hygiene and sanitation during production and handling may lead to Escherichia coli contamination, posing risks to food safety and public health. This study assessed the presence and contamination levels of E. coli in branded and unbranded soy milk sold at Bandungan Market, Semarang Regency, Indonesia. Thirty samples (15 branded and 15 unbranded) were purposively collected from five vendors and analyzed using the three stage Most Probable Number (MPN) method. Results were evaluated against the Indonesian National Standard (SNI 7388:2009), which sets a maximum limit of <3 MPN/mL for E. coli in beverages. Six samples (20.0%) were confirmed positive for E. coli, while 13 samples (43.3%) exceeded the regulatory limit. The Mann–Whitney U test showed no significant difference in contamination levels between branded and unbranded soy milk (U = 70.5, p = 0.3024), indicating comparable microbiological quality between the two product categories. These findings highlight microbiological contamination as a food safety concern affecting both product categories and underscore the need to strengthen hygiene practices, routine microbiological monitoring, and quality assurance throughout the production and distribution chain.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Untitled
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (92KB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: Soy Milk; Escherichia Coli; Most Probable Number (MPN); Microbial Contamination; Food Safety

Article Metrics:

  1. Alang, H. et al. (2024) ‘ Quality Analysis of Local Food Fermented Durian Paste (Tempoyak) in Pontianak Based on Nutrients and Bacterial Contaminants’, Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Biologi Nukleus, 10(3), pp. 784 – 795. DOI: 10.36987/jpbn.v10i3.6032
  2. Barmettler, K., Waser, S. and Stephan, R. (2025) ‘Microbiological quality of plant-based meat-alternative products collected at retail level in Switzerland’, Journal of Food Protection, 88(1), p. 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100402
  3. Chandra, R. et al. (2022) ‘Factors influencing consumer intention to purchase plant-based milk in Indonesia: an exploratory research’, TIJAB (The International Journal of Applied Business), 6(2), pp. 145–164. https://doi.org/10.20473/tijab.v6.I2.2022.35257
  4. Cui, J. (2025) ‘A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Methods in Social Science Research: ANOVA, Multi-factor ANOVA, Chi-square, and t-test’, ResearchGate. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36197.72164
  5. Dakum, D. et al. (2022) ‘Assistance in PIRT registration and halal certification for home industry Jenang Lot Karyasari, Bojong, Magelang Regency’, Community Empowerment, 7(8), pp. 1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.6696
  6. Ezemba, C.C. (2022) ‘Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Soymilk Beverage’, Available at SSRN 4085578 [Preprint]. DOI: 10.56557/jogae/2022/v14i47690
  7. Gao, Z. et al. (2024) ‘Development and evaluation of a modified most probable number (MPN) method for enumerating rifampicin‐resistant Escherichia coli in agricultural, food, and environmental samples’, Journal of Food Safety, 44(3), p. e13127. DOI: 10.1111/jfs.13127
  8. Hashim, S., Rosli, N. and Addis, S.N.O.R.K. (2025) ‘Microbiological assessment of soy milk collected from bazar Ramadhan in Kuala Nerus, Terengganu’, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Journal of Undergraduate Research, 7(1), pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46754/umtjur.v7i1.395
  9. He, Y. et al. (2025) ‘Modified Most Probable Number Assay to Quantify Salmonella in Raw and Ready-to-Cook Chicken Products’, Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE), (215), p. e67910. PMID: 39960189 DOI: 10.3791/67910
  10. Kuncara, M.C., Yuliati, F.N. and Prahesti, K.I. (2021) ‘The total plate count, Staphylococcus aureus, and pH value of raw chicken meat sold at the traditional markets in Maros regency’, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, p. 12157. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/788/1/012157
  11. Kurnianto, M.F. et al. (2020) ‘The Analysis of Consumer Perception on Quality of Soybean Milk Used Importance Performance Analysis Method’, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, p. 12051. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/411/1/012051
  12. Lirio, A.C.M. et al. (2023) ‘Development of a Statistical Approach for Microbial Monitoring in Non-sterile Pharmaceutical Environments’, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 18(3), pp. 1362–1370. DOI 10.1007/s12247-023-09719-4
  13. Mahdizade Ari, M. et al. (2025) ‘Viable but non-cultivable state in oral microbiota: a critical review of an underexplored microbial survival strategy’, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 15, p. 1533768. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1533768
  14. Manurung, K. A. et al. (2023) ‘Comparative Test on the Level Contamination of Escherichia coli and Salmonella sp. on Broiler Meat at Slaughterhouses and Traditional Markets in Medan’, Jurnal Peternakan Integratif, 11 (1), pp. 45–52. DOI : 10.32734/jpi.v11i1.11602
  15. Mulyati, S. and Raharjo, M. (2024) ‘Factors Associated with the Presence of E. coli in Food: Literature Review’, Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 7(7), pp. 1804–1810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v7i7.5325
  16. Nisaa, R.K., Soedjoto, L. and Kunsah, B. (2020) ‘Calculation of coliform number using most probable number (MPN) methods on soy milk sold in Pogot Area of Surabaya’, Journal of SCRTE, 4(1), pp. 26–33. https://doi.org/10.20473/jscrte.v4i1.21591
  17. Qin, P., Wang, T. and Luo, Y. (2022) ‘A review on plant-based proteins from soybean: Health benefits and soy product development’, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 7, p. 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100265
  18. Rahmanda, M., Feliatra, F. and Nursyirwani, N. (2025) ‘Density of Escherichia coli Bacteria in Blood Clams (Anadara granosa) in Anak Setatah Village, Meranti Islands Regency, Riau’, Jurnal Perikanan dan Kelautan, 30(2), pp. 212–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jpk.30.2.212-218
  19. Riina, M.D. et al. (2023) ‘Continuous variable analyses: T-test, Mann–Whitney, Wilcoxin rank’, in Translational radiation oncology. Elsevier, pp. 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88423-5.00070-4
  20. Roni, S.M. and Djajadikerta, H.G. (2021) Statistics and SPSS: Tests for Differences. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-0193-4
  21. Shakya, B., Shrestha, S.R. and Silvanus, V. (2021) ‘Bacteriological Examination of Water supply and Drinking Water at Household level in Makalbari Area by the Most Probable Number Method’, Nepal Medical College Journal, 23(2), pp. 146–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v23i2.38525
  22. Tambi, A., Brighu, U. and Gupta, A.B. (2023) ‘Methods for detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: a review’, Water Supply, 23(10), pp. 4047–4058. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.247
  23. Utami, H.V.T. v(2023) ‘Detection of Escherichia coli Bacterial Contamination on Cutlery at Warung Lesehan Around Nologaten Yogyakarta’, Journal of Medical Laboratory in Infectious and Degenerative Diseases, 1(1), pp. 17–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36858/jmid.v1i1
  24. Wardhana, D.K. et al. (2021) ‘Detection of Escherichia coli contamination using most probable number (MPN) methods in chicken meats in market of Surabaya’, Jurnal Medik Veteriner, 4(1), pp. 118–124. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmv.vol4.iss1.2021.118-124
  25. Warren, V., Bell, R. and Bruning-Mescher, S. (2024) ‘Plant-based milk alternatives: Consumer needs and marketing strategies’, in Plant-based food consumption. Elsevier, pp. 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98828-5.00006-1
  26. Wolstenholme, R. and Forbes, S. (2021) ‘Presumptive Testing’, Analytical Techniques in Forensic Science, pp. 51–69. DOI: 10.1002/9781119373421.ch3t

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-18 02:55:24

No citation recorded.