skip to main content

TIPOLOGI PARTISIPASI POLITIK PEMILIH LAKI-LAKI DI KABUPATEN BOGOR BERDASARKAN PENGGUNAAN SUMBER INFORMASI POLITIK

*Roni Jayawinangun  -  Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
Dini Valdiani  -  Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2020 Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract
In nowdays context, the community political participation has slightly changed as a result of technological development. In 2018, our regional election had failed to achieve minum target of political participation level that had been given by the Indonesian government. The government was targeting 77.5 percent but in the reality the society participation level only reached 73.24 percent due to the low level of participation from male voters. This research is conducted in order to identify male voters typology in Bogor Regency based on their utilization of political information sources or media. Quantitative method was used as metodological approach, 200 male voters were taken as research sampel by using quota samping based on their electoral district, and Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) was used as data analysis. This research finds that television and internet are the most frequently used media meanwhile, campaign props and television are the most trusted source of political information. The typology of male voters with the highest percentage in Bogor Regency is apathetic voters (34%) followed by naive (29.5%), alienated (19%) and loyal voters (17.5%).

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Surat pernyataan integritas
Subject Surat pernyataan integritas
Type Other
  Download (234KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Political information; male voters; typology of voters

Article Metrics:

  1. Budiardjo, M. (1994). Demokrasi di Indonesia: Demokrasi parlementer dan demokrasi Pancasila : kumpulan karangan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  2. Direktorat Jendral Otonomi Daerah. (2018). Pilakada Serentak Tahun 2018 (p. 14). Retrieved from Kementerian Dalam Negeri website: https://otda.kemendagri.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/5.-Evaluasi-Pilkada-Serentak-2018.pdf
  3. Halim, U., & Jauhari, K. D. (2019). Pengaruh Terpaan Media Terhadap Partisipasi Politik Dalam Pilkada DKI Jakarta 2017. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 4(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v4i1.385
  4. Indikator. (2013). INTERNET, APATISME, DAN ALIENASI POLITIK Temuan Survei Nasional 19-27 Juni 2013 (p. 48) [Online]. Retrieved from Indikator Politik Indonesia website: http://indikator.co.id/uploads/20130723190925.23_Juli_2013_Rilis_INDIKATOR.pdf
  5. Jayawinangun, R., & Nugroho, D. R. (2019). SEGMENTASI PEMILIH PEMULA BERDASARKAN AKSES BERITA POLITIK MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL DI KABUPATEN BOGOR. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 17(2), 157–164
  6. Kim, Y., & Chen, H.-T. (2016). Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.008
  7. Lestari, S. B. (2019). Pemaknaan Dan Sikap Remaja Pada Berita Kampanye Pilpres 2019 Di Media Sosial. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.8.1.1-11
  8. Martha, L. P. (2015). Hubungan Penggunaan Sumber Informasi Kampanye Dan Partisipasi Politik (Kasus Pilpres 2014 Di Kabupaten Bogor) (Thesis, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB)). Retrieved from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/80035
  9. Miaz, Y. (2012). Partisipasi Politik: Pola Perilaku Pemilih pada Masa Orde Baru dan Reformasi. In S. R. Syahrul R. (Ed.), artisipasi Politik: Pola Perilaku Pemilih pada Masa Orde Baru dan Reformasi (pp. 1–203). Retrieved from http://repository.unp.ac.id/72/
  10. Mierina, I. (2011). Political Participation and Development of Political Attitudes in Post-Communist Countries. University of Latvia
  11. Nurudin. (2017). Perkembangan Teknologi Komunikasi (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  12. Ognyanova, K., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2015). Political Efficacy on the Internet: A Media System Dependency Approach. In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, & J. Schulz (Eds.), Studies in Media and Communications (Vol. 9, pp. 3–27). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000009001
  13. Saldaña, M., McGregor, S. C., & Zuniga, H. G. D. (2015). Social Media as a Public Space for Politics: Cross-National Comparison of News Consumption and Participatory Behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3304–3326
  14. Setiadi, H. (2009). Menuju Demokrasi Dengan Teknologi Informasi. semnasIF 2009, 4. Yogyakarta: UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
  15. Severin, W. J., & Tankard, J. W. (2010). Teori Komunikasi: Sejarah, Metode, dan Terapan di Dalam Media Massa -5/E. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/9749/teori-komunikasi-sejarah-metode-dan-terapan-di-dalam-media-massa-5-e-.html
  16. Simanjuntak, S. A. (2017, February 13). Pilkada Serentak, Pembelajaran Demokrasi. Retrieved September 1, 2019, from Kompas.com website: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/02/13/21060011/pilkada.serentak.pembelajaran.demokrasi

Last update:

  1. PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN INSTAGRAM TERHADAP PARTISIPASI POLITIK PEMILIH PEMULA PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN RI 2019

    Devianti Anggraini, Aang Wahyu Ariesta, A.G. Eka Wenats Wuryanta. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 11 (1), 2022. doi: 10.14710/interaksi.11.1.1-12

Last update: 2024-10-07 10:26:28

No citation recorded.