DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.13.1.37-59

DIGITAL LITERACY AND ONLINE TRUST TO AVOID CYBERBULLYING ANONYMITY AMONG TWITTER ROLE PLAYERS COMMUNITY

*Putri Fajar Ayu Hendrayani  -  Department of Library and Information Science, Social and Politic Faculty, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study aims to present the importance of digital literacy skills and the developed of an online trust to avoid cyberbullying anonymity mechanisms among Twitter role players as a virtual community. This study uses three main theories, namely: “Digital Identities: Creating and Communicating the Online Self”; “Online trust: A Stakeholder Perspective, Concepts, Implications, And Future Directions”; and “Anonymity, Pseudonymity, and Deliberation: Why Not Everything Should Be Connected”. This study uses a quantitative method using a descriptive approach to describe the findings of the results in the field in detail. The cross-table is used as an analytical tool to see whether there is an impact on the variable being tested. In this study, it was found that the results of the analysis on the impact of digital literacy and cyberbullying anonymity using a cross-table showed no impact between the two variables, which means that digital literacy skills have no impact whatsoever on avoiding cyberbullying anonymity among Twitter role players. While the results of the analysis on the impact of online trust and cyberbullying anonymity using a cross-table show that there is an impact in the moderate category between the two variables, which means that the formation of online trust has quite an impact on avoiding cyberbullying anonymity among Twitter role players.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Digital Literacy; Online Trust; Cyberbullying; Anonymity; Role Player: Role Playing Game.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
SYMBOLIC REALITY CONSTRUCTION OF THE K-POP COMMUNITY ON TWITTER FENOMENA FANWAR DALAM FANATISME PENGGEMAR KPOP PADA MEDIA SOSIAL TWITTER STRATEGI KONVERGENSI MEDIA DALAM KONTEN HIBURAN ANTV More recent articles
Most cited articles
TINGKAT KETERGANTUNGAN PENGGUNA MEDIA SOSIAL DAN KECEMASAN SOSIAL Komunikasi Orangtua-Anak dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Pendidikan FENOMENA PHUBBING DI ERA MILENIA (Ketergantungan Seseorang pada Smartphone terhadap Lingkungannya) Stigmatisasi Pemberitaan Terorisme di Media Massa SOCIAL STRATEGY PADA MEDIA SOSIAL UNTUK PROMOSI PARIWISATA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA More cited articles
  1. Al-Marghilani, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Cyberbullying-Free Online Social Networks in Smart Cities. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-022-00063-y
  2. Aljazzaf, Z. M., Perry, M., & Capretz, M. A. M. (2010). Online Trust: Definition and Principles. Proceedings - 5th International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology, ICCGI 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCGI.2010.17
  3. Ba, S. (2001). Establishing Online Trust Through A Community Responsibility System. Decision Support Systems, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00144-5
  4. Bierhoff, H.-W., & Vornefeld, B. (2004). The Social Psychology of Trust with Applications in the Internet. Analyse & Kritik, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2004-0103
  5. Blanchard, A. L., Welbourne, J. L., & Boughton, M. D. (2011). A Model of Online Trust: The Mediating Role of Norms and Sense of Virtual Community. Information Communication and Society, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003739633
  6. Brooks, R. R. (2020). Privacy and Anonymity. Introduction to Computer and Network Security, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14801-19
  7. Clark-Gordon, C. V., Bowman, N. D., Goodboy, A. K., & Wright, A. (2019). Anonymity and Online Self-Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis. Communication Reports. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1607516
  8. Cover, R. (2015). Digital Identities: Creating and Communicating the Online Self. In Digital Identities: Creating and Communicating the Online Self. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-12758-4
  9. Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media and Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366
  10. Ghozali, & I. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan PLS. Edisi Ke-4. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  11. Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as An Imagined Community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409378
  12. Jeewa, Z., & Wade, J.-P. (2015). Playing with Identity: Fan Role Playing on Twitter. Alternation 22,2, 2(2015)
  13. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic Bullying Among Middle School Students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6 SUPPL.), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
  14. Kuo, Y. F., & Feng, L. H. (2013). Relationships Among Community Interaction Characteristics, Perceived Benefits, Community Commitment, And Oppositional Brand Loyalty In Online Brand Communities. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.08.005
  15. Kurnia, N., Astuti, S. I., Kusumastuti, F., Monggilo, Z. M. Z., Prananingrum, E. N., & Adikara, G. J. (2021). Seri Modul Literasi Digital Kominfo-Japelidi-Siberkreasi. 20
  16. Martin, W. E., & Bridgmon, K. D. (2012). Quantitative and Statistical Research Methods From Hypothesis to Results. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 1–498
  17. Migunani, H. C., & Amir, M. (2021). Hubungan Antara Kontrol Diri Dengan Cyberbullying Pada Remaja Pengguna Game Online. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/90373
  18. Mishna, F., Sanders, J. E., McNeil, S., Fearing, G., & Kalenteridis, K. (2020). “If Somebody is Different”: A Critical Analysis of Parent, Teacher and Student Perspectives on Bullying and Cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105366
  19. Moore, A. (2018). Anonymity, Pseudonymity, and Deliberation: Why Not Everything Should Be Connected. Journal of Political Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12149
  20. Nascimbeni, F., & Vosloo, S. (2019). Digital Literacy for Children: Exploring Definitions and Frameworks. Unesco, 01, 1–49
  21. Nirwana Sari, R., & . S. (2016). Kecerdasan Emosi, Anonimitas dan Cyberbullying (Bully Dunia Maya). Persona:Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.30996/persona.v5i01.741
  22. Nugraha, R. (2020). Establishment of Role-Player as a Virtual Identity in Twitter Social Media. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295161
  23. Omernick, E., & Sood, S. O. (2013). The Impact of Anonymity in Online Communities. Proceedings - SocialCom/PASSAT/BigData/EconCom/BioMedCom 2013, 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.80
  24. Over, F., & Behavior, R. S. (2022). Legal Protection Againts Crime Victims From Social Media
  25. Pentina, I., Zhang, L., & Basmanova, O. (2013). Antecedents and Consequences of Trust in a Social Media Brand: A Cross-cultural Study of Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.045
  26. Piegorsch, W. W., & Bailer, A. J. (2020). Analysis of Cross-Classified Tabular/Categorical Data. In Statistics for Environmental Biology and Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203738504-9
  27. Pieschl, S., & Porsch, T. (2017). The Complex Relationship between Cyberbullying and Trust. International Journal of Developmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-160208
  28. Pilav-Velić, A., Aerne, M., Trkman, P., Wong, S. I., & Abaz, A. K. (2021). Digital or Innovative: Understanding “digital Literacy - Practice - Innovative Work Behavior” Chain. South East European Journal of Economics and Business. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2021-0009
  29. Pradana, Y. (2018). 68 - 182. Untirta Civic Education Journal, 3(2), 168–182
  30. Rinaldi, M. R., Aulia, D., & Ibadurruhama, N. A. (2020). Cyberbullying pada Penggemar K-Pop. Prosiding Seminar Nasional
  31. Rusdy, M., & Fauzi, F. (2020). Digital Literacy and Cyberbullying Behavior of Youths in Instagram. Komunike. https://doi.org/10.20414/jurkom.v12i2.2699
  32. Sengupta, A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Are Social Networking Sites A Source of Online Harassment For Teens? Evidence from Survey Data. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.011
  33. Shankar, V., Urban, G. L., & Sultan, F. (2002). Online Trust: A Stakeholder Perspective, Concepts, Implications, and Future Directions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3–4), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00022-7
  34. Sheard, J. (2018). Quantitative Data Analysis. Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition, 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00018-2
  35. Singarimbun, M. (2006). Metode Penelitian Survai. Lp3Es
  36. Singh, Y. K. (2006). Fundamental of Research Methodology and Statistics. In Methodology Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  37. Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan
  38. Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
  39. Sun, C. T., Chou, K. T., & Yu, H. C. (2022). Relationship Between Digital Game Experience and Problem-Solving Performance According to a PISA Framework. In Computers and Education (Vol. 186). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104534
  40. UNESCO. (2019). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. United Nation Educational Scientific And Cultural Organisation. In https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf
  41. UNICEF. (2019). Cyberbullying: Apa Itu dan Bagaimana Menghentikannya?. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. In https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/id/child-protection/apa-itu-cyberbullying
  42. You, L., & Lee, Y. H. (2019). The Bystander Effect in Cyberbullying On Social Network Sites: Anonymity, group size, and intervention intentions. Telematics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101284
  43. Zhang, Z., & Wang, K. (2013). A Trust Model For Multimedia Social Networks. Social Network Analysis And Mining. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S13278-012-0078-4

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-18 00:48:08

No citation recorded.