skip to main content

Political message disruption in family communication patterns on social media

*Zen Amirudin  -  Doctoral Program of Social Science, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Rachmah Ida  -  Department of Communication Science, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Irfan Wahyudi  -  Department of Communication Science, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Received: 9 Oct 2025; Published: 31 Dec 2025.
Open Access Copyright 2025 Zen Amirudin, Rachmah Ida, Irfan Wahyudi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study examines the disruption of political messages within Family Communication Patterns (FCP) through social media in the context of the 2024 General Election in Blimbing District, Malang City. No study has specifically analyzed how algorithmic disruption shapes political message negotiation across the four FCP types. This research addresses this gap by providing the first empirical integration of Stuart Hall's encoding-decoding model with FCP typology in the Indonesian electoral context. Employing a qualitative approach with reception analysis methodology, the research involved 8 informants from 4 families representing pluralistic, protective, consensual, and laissez-faire types, with data collection through in-depth interviews, and participant observation. Findings reveal that social media has fundamentally transformed family political communication from a single-encoder model to a multiple-encoder ecosystem, wherein younger generations now function as primary decoders who re-encode political messages for parental consumption. Based on Hall's (1973) framework, the protective family demonstrated dominant-hegemonic reading characterized by uncritical acceptance of preferred meanings and rejection of counter-hegemonic messages; pluralistic and consensual families adopted negotiated reading through distinct mechanisms collaborative co-decoding via weekly political forums versus hierarchical decoding through family digest rituals respectively; the laissez-faire family exhibited fragmented individual reading without collective meaning-making processes; and no family fully adopted oppositional reading, although children in the protective family exhibited emerging oppositional tendencies triggering intergenerational conflicts over meaning-making authority. This study contributes to political communication scholarship by proposing "algorithmic encoding" as a third FCP dimension and a "distributed encoding-decoding framework," thereby extending Hall's model beyond mass media contexts into digitally-mediated family communication.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Family Communication Pattern; Reception Study; Encoding-Decoding; Political Communication; social media; 2024 General Election

Article Metrics:

  1. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2023). Survei internet Indonesia 2023. APJII
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Malang. (2023). Kecamatan Blimbing dalam angka 2023. BPS Kota Malang
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Buzzanell, P. M. (2010). Resilience: Talking, resisting, and imagining new normalcies into being. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x
  5. Clark, L. S., & Marchi, R. (2017). Young people and the future of news: Social media and the rise of connective journalism. Cambridge University Press
  6. Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents' digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12067
  7. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications
  8. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism: Exploring direct, indirect and generational effects. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642933
  9. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 128-138). Hutchinson
  10. Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge
  11. Hootsuite. (2025). Data digital Indonesia 2025. We Are Social. https://andi.link/hootsuite-we-are-social-data-digital-indonesia-2025/
  12. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: The roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Communication Yearbook, 26, 36-68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15567419cy2601_2
  13. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 50-65). SAGE Publications
  14. Koerner, A. F., & Schrodt, P. (2014). An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 14(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.857328
  15. Kompas Litbang. (2023). Survei kepemimpinan nasional: Media sosial pengaruhi pemilih pada pemilu 2024. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2023/12/14/media-sosial-pengaruhi-pemilih-pada-pemilu-2024
  16. Livingstone, S. (2019). Audiences in an age of datafication: Critical questions for media research. Television & New Media, 20(2), 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418811118
  17. Mascheroni, G., Jorge, A., & Farrugia, L. (2021). Media representations and children's discourses on online risks: Findings from qualitative research in nine European countries. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-2-2
  18. Morley, D. (2006). Unanswered questions in audience research. The Communication Review, 9(2), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663294
  19. Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2020). Democratic creative destruction? The effect of a changing media landscape on democracy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220970311
  20. Radio Republik Indonesia. (2024). Data statistik penggunaan media sosial masyarakat Indonesia tahun 2024. RRI.co.id. https://www.rri.co.id/iptek/721570/ini-data-statistik-penggunaan-media-sosial-masyarakat-indonesia-tahun-2024
  21. Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Messersmith, A. S. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75(3), 248-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802256318
  22. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. (2024). Politik digital: Keterlibatan media sosial dalam meningkatkan partisipasi politik generasi muda pada pesta demokrasi 2024. Setneg.go.id. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/politik_digital_keterlibatan_media_sosial_dalam_meningkatkan_partisipasi_politik_generasi_muda_pada_pesta_demokrasi_2024
  23. Thorson, K. (2020). Attracting the news: Algorithms, platforms, and reframing incidental exposure. Journalism, 21(8), 1067-1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915372
  24. Vromen, A., Loader, B. D., Xenos, M. A., & Bailo, F. (2016). Everyday making through Facebook engagement: Young citizens' political interactions in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Political Studies, 64(3), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715614012
  25. Yanti, S., Hudi, I., Asmawati, T., Putri, A., Astuti, W. P., Hayat, R. H., Aryandi, M. Z., & Zulpardi. (2024). Analisis peran dan pengaruh media sosial terhadap pemilu 2024. Kybernology Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 41-50. https://journal.wiyatapublisher.or.id/index.php/kybernology/article/view/50

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-01-02 22:49:32

No citation recorded.