BibTex Citation Data :
@article{IP50775, author = {Mohamad Rosyidin}, title = {Realisme versus Liberalisme: Suatu Perbandingan Paradigmatis}, journal = {Indonesian Perspective}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, year = {2022}, keywords = {realism; liberalism; international relations; incommensurability}, abstract = { Realism and liberalism are the most dominant paradigms in the study of International Relations. Both are often positioned diametrically because they have basic assumptions that contradict each other. Even though comparing the two paradigms violates the principle of incommensurability, it doesn't mean it's not useful. This paper attempts to map the two paradigms based on their underlying assumptions. Although in many respects realism and liberalism are opposites in viewing the phenomenon of international relations, both of them basically have similarities in viewing the nature of the international system and the nature of actors. This paper attempts to see what are the strong and weaknesses of each paradigm to see how far both are able to explain the phenomenon of international relations. Nevertheless, this paper does not pretend to judge one paradigm as better than another. }, issn = {2548-1436}, pages = {134--144} doi = {10.14710/ip.v7i2.50775}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ip/article/view/50775} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Realism and liberalism are the most dominant paradigms in the study of International Relations. Both are often positioned diametrically because they have basic assumptions that contradict each other. Even though comparing the two paradigms violates the principle of incommensurability, it doesn't mean it's not useful. This paper attempts to map the two paradigms based on their underlying assumptions. Although in many respects realism and liberalism are opposites in viewing the phenomenon of international relations, both of them basically have similarities in viewing the nature of the international system and the nature of actors. This paper attempts to see what are the strong and weaknesses of each paradigm to see how far both are able to explain the phenomenon of international relations. Nevertheless, this paper does not pretend to judge one paradigm as better than another.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-11-21 21:22:20
The author(s) whose article is published in the IP (Indonesian Perspective) attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to IP (Indonesian Perspective), the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. IP (Indonesian Perspective) will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. IP (Indonesian Perspective) will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. IP (Indonesian Perspective) allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and IP (Indonesian Perspective) to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
View My Stats
