DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jbs.32.1.15-25

REVISITED CULTURAL HERITAGE & ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE PREFERENCES TO LEVERAGE SUSTAINABLE TOURISM PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON INDONESIA WORLD HERITAGE SITES

*Kardison Lumban Batu  -  Department of Management, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Aulia Vidya Almadana orcid scopus  -  Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2023 JURNAL BISNIS STRATEGI

Citation Format:
Abstract
Present study investigated the local benevolence uniqueness (LBU) and Aesthetical Environmental Look (AEL) on Sustainable Tourism Performance (STP) mediated by Revisited Cultural Heritage Value (RCHV) & Architectural Heritage Preferences (AHP.  Data was gathering through survey with questionnaires based from January to June 2022, also questionnaires were distributed to email as well as other social media platform with google forms. Data collection is gained from the domestics’ tourists who have made traveling more than twice and visiting cultural heritage sites. 500 questionnaires were sent and 400 were returned and 383 could be used for further analysis. with non-purposive sampling and purposive sampling technique, respondents should have made traveling). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS 22 was deployed to analyze data. Statistical outputs demonstrated the research findings showing all the proposed hypotheses have significant impact on sustain tourism performance.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Local Benevolence Uniqueness, Aesthetical Environmental Look, Revisited Cultural Heritage Value, Architectural Heritage Preferences

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
THE EFFECT OF RETURN ON ASSETS, RETURN ON EQUITY AND NET INTEREST MARGIN ON STOCK PRICES IN BANKING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE FOR THE 2017-2021 PERIOD THE TRANSFORMATION MODEL OF ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOLS IN CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT SEEN FROM LOCAL RELIGIOSITY TOWARDS GLOBAL IDEALITY AT THE RAUDLOH AL THOHIRIYAH ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOL KAJEN PATI THE EFFECT OF DISCIPLINE AND MOTIVATION ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH INCENTIVES AS A MODERATOR VARIABLE (AT THE CLASS I RAILWAY ENGINEERING CENTER FOR THE CENTRAL JAVA REGION) More recent articles
Most cited articles
ENTRY BARRIER Antara Persaingan Potensial dan Aktual DETERMINANTS OF SALES PERSON PERFORMANCE THE EFFECT OF ASSET STRUCTURE, PROFITABILITY, COMPANY SIZE, AND COMPANY GROWTH ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE (The Study of Manufacturing Companies Listed on the IDX for the Period 2013 - 2017) ANALISIS FAKTOR FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KINERJA KEUANGAN BANK UMUM DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Umum Dengan Total Assets Kurang Dari 1 Triliun) PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA, KOMUNIKASI ANTAR PRIBADI DAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEJABAT STRUKTURAL DAN DOSEN TETAP DI BEBERAPA PERGURUAN TINGGI SWASTA DI JAKARTA More cited articles
  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988)
  2. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423
  3. Andre´ Hansla, Amelie Gamble, Asgeir
  4. Juliusson, & Garling, T. (2008). The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004
  5. Annechini, C., Menardo, E., Hall, R., &
  6. Pasini, M. (2020). Aesthetic Attributes of Museum Environmental Experience: A Pilot Study With Children as Visitors Frontirs in Psychology, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.508300
  7. Averill, J. R., Stanat, P., & More, T. A
  8. (1999). Aesthetics and the Environment. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 153-174. doi: 1089-2680/98/$3.(X)
  9. Bang Nguyen Viet , Dang, H. P., &
  10. Nguyen, H. H. (2020). Revisit intention and satisfaction: The role of destination image, perceived risk, and cultural contact Cogent Business & Management, 7(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1796249
  11. Brady, E., & Prior, J. (2020)
  12. Environmental aesthetics A synthetic review. People and Nature, 2, 254-266. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10089
  13. Cavagnaro, E., Staffieri, S., & Postma, A
  14. (2018). Understanding millennials’ tourism experience: values and meaning to travel as a key for identifying target clusters for youth (sustainable) tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures. doi: 10.1108/JTF-12-2017-0058
  15. Chaira, D. A. F., & Nowaczek, A. M. K. (
  16. . An Examination of Values and Environmental Attitudes Among Ecotourists: A Descriptive Study Involving Three Samples. Tourism Recreation Research, 28(1), 11-21. doi: 10.1080/02508281.2003.11081382
  17. Council, W. T. a. T. (2010). Recovery
  18. stronger than expected, but likely to slow down in 2011. . World Travel and Tourism Council Press Release, 9 November, http:// ww.wttc.org/eng/Tourism_News/Press_Releases/
  19. Dodds, R., Graci, S. R., & Holmes, M
  20. (2009). Does the tourist care? A comparison of tourists in Koh Phi Phi, Thailand and Gili Trawangan, Indonesia Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18:2, 207-222. doi: 10.1080/09669580903215162
  21. Dowling, R., & Fennell, D. (2003). The
  22. context of ecotourism policy and planning. In: Fennell DA and Dowling RK (eds) Ecotourism Policy and Planning. . Wallingford: CABI, 1-20
  23. Fairweather, J. R., & Maslin, C. ( 2005)
  24. Environmental Values and Response to Ecolabels Among International Visitors to New Zealand Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13(1). doi: 10.1080/17501220508668474
  25. Gelissen, J. ( 2007 ). Explaining Popular
  26. Support for Environmental Protection A Multilevel Analysis of 50 Nations Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 392-415. doi: 10.1177/0013916506292014
  27. Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi, Janani
  28. Kumaravelu, and, Y.-N. G., & Singh, K. S. D. ( 2021). Understanding the intention to revisit a destination by expanding the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Spanish Journal of Marketing – Emerald Publishing Limited, 25(2), 280-307. doi: 10.1108/SJME-12-2019-0109
  29. Guedoudj, W., Ghenouchi, A., &
  30. Toussaint, J.-Y. (2020). Urban attractiveness in public squares: the mutual influence of the urban environment and the social activities in Batna. urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana,, 12, 2-12. doi: 10.1590/2175-3369.012.e20190162
  31. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., &
  32. Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) Sage, London, 2
  33. Hamid, A. H. A., & Mohamad, M. R
  34. (2020). Tourists’ revisit intention to UNESCO world heritage sites in a developing nation: Investigating the mediating role of place dependence Journal of Vacation Marketing, 20(10), 1-14. doi: 10.1177/1356766720969739
  35. Honkanen, P., & Verplanken, B. (2004)
  36. Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food: The role of values and attitude strength. . Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 104-420
  37. Joshia, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors
  38. Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions International Strategic Management Review, 3, 128-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
  39. Kalamarovaa, M., Loucanovab, E.,
  40. Parobekc, J., & Supin, M. (2015). The support of the cultural heritage utilization in historical town reserves Procedia Economics and Finance, 26 914 - 919. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00904-1
  41. Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-
  42. Forleo, G. (2011). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503-520. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006155
  43. Lavdas, A. A., & Schirpke, U. (2020)
  44. Aesthetic preference is related to organized complexity Plos One, 15(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235257
  45. Lee, W. H., & Moscardo, G. (2008)
  46. Understanding the Impact of Ecotourism Resort Experiences on Tourists’ Environmental Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13(6), 546-565. doi: 10.1080/09669580508668581
  47. Li, H., You, C., Li, J., Tan, M. L. M., Zhang,
  48. G., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Influence of Environmental Aesthetic Value and Anticipated Emotion on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An ERP Study Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 5714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095714
  49. Lin, H.-H., Ling, Y., Lin, J.-C., & Liang, Z.-
  50. F. (2021). Research on the Development of Religious Tourism and the Sustainable Development of Rural Environment and Health Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 2731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052731
  51. López-Sanz JM, Penelas-Leguía A,
  52. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, & Cuesta-Valiño. (2021). Rural Tourism and the Sustainable Development Goals. A Study of the Variables That Most Influence the Behavior of the Tourist. Front. Psychol., 12, 722973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722973
  53. Malloy, T. E., & Kinney, L. (2017)
  54. Implications for the self determine benevolence and self-protection in intergroup relations, Self and Identity. Self and Identity, 16(2), 171-193. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2016.1241822
  55. Mehmetoglu, M. (2010). Accurately
  56. Identifying and Comparing Sustainable Tourists, Nature-Based Tourists, and Ecotourists on the Basis of Their Environmental Concerns. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 11(2), 171 - 199. doi: 10.1080/15256481003732840
  57. Mehmetoglu, M., Hines, K., Graumann,
  58. C., & Greibrokk, J. (2010). The relationship between personal values and tourism behaviour: a segmentation approach. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 16(17). doi: 10.1177/1356766709356210
  59. Mohammed, I., Mahmoud, M. A., &
  60. Hinson, R. E. (2021). The effect of brand heritage in tourists’ intention to revisit Brand heritage. doi: 10.1108/JHTI-03-2021-0070
  61. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004)
  62. Values Environmental Concern and Behavior A Study Into Household Energy Use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70-93. doi: 10.1177/0013916503251466
  63. Río, J. A. J. d., & Hernández-Rojas, R. D
  64. (2020). Loyalty in Heritage Tourism: The Case of Córdoba and Its Four World Heritage Sites Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 8950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238950
  65. Rohan, M. (2000). A rose by any name?
  66. The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255-277
  67. Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron,
  68. L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franek, M. (2005 ). Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(457). doi: 10.1177/0022022105275962
  69. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999)
  70. Values as predictors of environmental attitudes. Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265
  71. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universal in the
  72. content and structure of values: Theoretical and Advantages and empirical test in 20 countries Advances in Experiemental Social Psychology, 25. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
  73. Sebastian, & Bamberg. (2003). How does
  74. environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 21-32. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6
  75. Shaw, K., Tang, N., & Liao, H. (2020)
  76. Authoritarian-Benevolent Leadership, Moral Disengagement, and Follower Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: An Investigation of the Effects of Ambidextrous Leadership. Front. Psychol., 11, 500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00590
  77. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z,
  78. Marquis M, & K, A. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
  79. Svare, H., Gausdal, A. H., & Möllering, G
  80. (2019). The function of ability, benevolence, and integrity based trust in innovation networks Industry and Innovation, 1-21. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1632695
  81. Swarbrooke, J. (1999). Sustainable
  82. Tourism Management. . Wallingford: CABI
  83. Thogersen, J. (2004). A cognitive
  84. dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2
  85. Throsby, D., Zednik, A., & Araña, J. E
  86. (2021). Public preferences for heritage conservation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 45, 333-358. doi: 10.1007/s10824-021-09406-7
  87. Torabi, Z.-A., Shalbafian, A. A., Allam, Z.,
  88. Ghaderi, Z., & Murgant, B. (2022). Enhancing Memorable Experiences, Tourist Satisfaction, and Revisit Intention through Smart Tourism Technologies Sustainability, 13, 2721. doi: 10.3390/su14052721
  89. Trifkovi´c, M., Kuburi´c, M., Nestorovi´c,
  90. Ž., Jovanovi´c, G., & Kekanovi´, M. (2021). The Attractiveness of Urban Complexes: Economic Aspect and Risks of Environmental Pollution Sustainability, 13, 8098. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148098
  91. Wang, P.-C., & Yu, C.-Y. (2018). Aesthetic
  92. Experience as an Essential Factor to Trigger Positive Environmental Consciousness Sustainability, 6(10), 1098. doi: 10.3390/su10041098
  93. Y, K., & SM, C. (2005). Antecedents of
  94. green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. . Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592-599
  95. Yang, C.-H., & Lin, H.-Y. (2014)
  96. Revisiting the relationship between World Heritage Sites and tourism Tourism Economics, 20(1), 73-86. doi: 10.5367/te.2013.0359
  97. Zhou, G., Chen, W., & Wu, Y. (2022)
  98. Research on the Effect of Authenticity on Revisit Intention in Heritage Tourism Front. Psychol. 13:, 13(8), 3380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883380

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-21 07:41:03

No citation recorded.