DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.20.3.186-196

MITIGASI RISIKO KECELAKAAN KERJA DI PELABUHAN DENGAN BOWTIE ANALYSIS: STUDI KASUS DI PT PELABUHAN INDONESIA REGIONAL 2 TELUK BAYUR

*Taufiq Ihsan orcid scopus  -  Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
Ari Kurniawan Hendri  -  Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
Shinta Silvia  -  Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
Annisa Maulidya  -  Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Kegiatan bongkar muat di pelabuhan merupakan aktivitas yang kompleks dan berisiko tinggi, sehingga membutuhkan perhatian khusus terhadap keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi, menganalisis, dan mengendalikan risiko kecelakaan kerja pada kegiatan bongkar muat di PT Pelabuhan Indonesia (Pelindo) Regional 2 Teluk Bayur. Metode yang digunakan adalah Bowtie Analysis, yang memungkinkan visualisasi dan analisis hubungan sebab-akibat dari suatu kejadian secara komprehensif.  Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi lapangan, kuesioner, wawancara dengan pekerja dan staf K3, serta studi literatur.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat dua jenis kegiatan dengan risiko tinggi, yaitu penanganan general cargo dan penanganan peti kemas.  Ancaman utama yang dapat menyebabkan kecelakaan kerja antara lain human error, peralatan yang tidak layak, kurangnya penerangan, housekeeping yang buruk, dan cuaca buruk.  Konsekuensi dari kecelakaan kerja meliputi kematian, cedera fisik dan trauma psikologis, gangguan operasional bongkar muat, dan turunnya reputasi perusahaan.  Berdasarkan analisis risiko, dirumuskan rekomendasi strategi pengendalian risiko yang efektif, meliputi preventive control dan mitigation control, serta rekomendasi perbaikan prosedur K3 yang ada.

 

Abstract

[Mitigating Occupational Accident Risks in Ports with Bowtie Analysis: A Case Study at PT Pelabuhan Indonesia Regional 2 Teluk Bayur] Loading and unloading activities in ports are complex and high-risk operations, demanding specific attention to occupational health and safety (OHS). This study aims to identify, analyze, and control the risk of accidents in these activities at PT Pelabuhan Indonesia (Pelindo) Regional 2 Teluk Bayur. The Bowtie Analysis method is used for its comprehensive visualization and analysis of cause-and-effect relationships in accidents. Data was gathered through field observations, questionnaires, interviews with workers and OHS staff, and a literature review. The results reveal two high-risk activities: general cargo handling and container handling. Major threats leading to accidents include human error, equipment malfunction, poor lighting, inadequate housekeeping, and adverse weather. Consequences range from fatalities and physical injuries to psychological trauma, operational disruptions, and damage to the company's reputation. Based on the risk analysis, this study formulates recommendations for effective risk control strategies, including preventive and mitigation controls, along with suggestions for improving existing OHS procedures.

Keywords: solar panel; renewable energy; optimization; hybrid

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: bowtie analysis; cargo handling; occupational accidents; ports; risk management

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Case Studies
Language : ID
Recent articles
EVALUATION OF OFFICE CHAIR DESIGN FROM ERGONOMIC AND ANTHROPOMETRIC PERSPECTIVES IMPLEMENTATION OF AGGREGATE PLANNING FOR SMES IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY EVALUASI USABILITY WEBSITE PRODUK ORGANIK DENGAN METODE SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE MITIGASI RISIKO KECELAKAAN KERJA DI PELABUHAN DENGAN BOWTIE ANALYSIS: STUDI KASUS DI PT PELABUHAN INDONESIA REGIONAL 2 TELUK BAYUR OPTIMASI PENGGUNAAN SISTEM HYBRID PANEL SURYA-PLN UNTUK MEMINIMASI BIAYA ENERGI LISTRIK JANGKA PANJANG (STUDI KASUS: 20 TAHUN) More recent articles
Most cited articles
PERENCANAAN MANAJEMEN PROYEK DALAM MENINGKATKAN EFISIENSI DAN EFEKTIFITAS SUMBER DAYA PERUSAHAAN (Studi Kasus : Qiscus Pte Ltd) PEMILIHAN PEMASOK COOPER ROD MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANP (Studi Kasus : PT. Olex Cables Indonesia (OLEXINDO)) PRIORITAS PENENTUAN LOKASI WADUK PADA DAS CILIWUNG UNTUK PENGENDALIAN BANJIR JAKARTA INTEGRASI METODE ANP DAN TOPSIS DALAM EVALUASI KINERJA SUPPLIER DAN PENENTUAN PRIORITAS SUPPLIER BAHAN BAKU UTAMA CETAK KORAN PADA PT MASSCOM GRAPHY SEMARANG ANALISA PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER RAMAH LINGKUNGAN DENGAN METODE ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESS (ANP) PADA PT KIMIA FARMA PLANT SEMARANG More cited articles
  1. Acebes, F., González-Varona, J. M., López-Paredes, A., & Pajares, J. (2024). Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: A quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 670. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03180-5
  2. Adill, L. M., & Muthuswamy, V. (2023). A Review of Crane-Related Accidents and Safety in Crane Operations Abstract : International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 6(2), 642–650
  3. Alias, A. N., Yaakub, N., Baharuddin, M. R., Sciences, H., Azhar, M., Noor, M., Bertam, K., Batas, K., & Pinang, P. (2022). Port terminal safety : A conceptual paper on factors that affects occupational stress risk assessment in container terminal. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(July), 5080–5090
  4. Aome, P., & Widiawan, K. (2022). Identifikasi Bahaya , Penilaian Risiko dan Pengendalian Risiko dalam Kegiatan Bongkar Muat di PT Pelabuhan Indonesia IV cabang Makassar New Port. Jurnal Titra, 10(1), 135–142
  5. Babu, B. M., & Aithal, P. S. (2023). Critical Analysis of Container Accidents in International Logistics Critical Analysis of Container Accidents in International. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, 7(3), 194–204
  6. Budiyanto, M. A., & Fernanda, H. (2020). Risk Assessment of Work Accident in Container Terminals Using the Fault Tree Analysis Method. In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (Vol. 8, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8060466
  7. Coşar, A. K., & Demir, B. (2018). Shipping inside the box: Containerization and trade. Journal of International Economics, 114, 331–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.07.008
  8. de Ruijter, A., & Guldenmund, F. (2016). The bowtie method: A review. Safety Science, 88, 211–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.001
  9. Garcia-Alonso, L., Moura, T. G. Z., & Roibas, D. (2020). The effect of weather conditions on port technical efficiency. Marine Policy, 113, 103816. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103816
  10. Glette-Iversen, I., Flage, R., & Aven, T. (2023). Extending and improving current frameworks for risk management and decision-making: A new approach for incorporating dynamic aspects of risk and uncertainty. Safety Science, 168, 106317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106317
  11. Gonçalves, A., Dutra, A., & Mussi, C. C. (2025). Occupational risks and health and safety management strategies in the port sector: A systematic literature review. Safety Science, 184, 106767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106767
  12. Ihsan, T., Silvia, S., Derosya, V., Edwin, T., & Dewi, M. S. (2021). Penilaian Risiko Terhadap Postur Kerja Pada Pekerja Pabrik Karet Indonesia. J@ti Undip : Jurnal Teknik Industri, 16(2), 116–122
  13. Jain, A., Zwetsloot, G., & Torres, L. (2024). Sustainability, business responsibility and occupational health, safety and wellbeing in the future of work. Safety Science, 174, 106463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106463
  14. Jensen, R. C., Bird, R. L., & Nichols, B. W. (2022). Risk Assessment Matrices for Workplace Hazards : Design for Usability
  15. Jin, L., Liu, H., Zheng, X., & Chen, S. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Wind Loads on Tower Crane Operation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(1), 2807438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2807438
  16. Kadir, Z. A., Mohammad, R., Othman, N., Amrin, A., Muhtazaruddin, M. N., Abu-Bakar, S. H., & Muhammad-Sukki, F. (2020). Risk Management Framework for Handling and Storage of Cargo at Major Ports in Malaysia towards Port Sustainability. In Sustainability (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020516
  17. León-Mateos, F., Sartal, A., López-Manuel, L., & Quintás, M. A. (2021). Adapting our sea ports to the challenges of climate change: Development and validation of a Port Resilience Index. Marine Policy, 130, 104573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104573
  18. Li, X., Chua, J. Y., & Yuen, K. F. (2024). A review on maritime disruption management: Categories, impacts, and strategies. Transport Policy, 154, 40–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.05.013
  19. Maternová, A., Materna, M., Dávid, A., Török, A., & Švábová, L. (2023). Human Error Analysis and Fatality Prediction in Maritime Accidents. In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (Vol. 11, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122287
  20. Merz, M., Grøtli, E. I., Mørkrid, O. E., Tangstad, E., Fossøy, S., & Nordahl, H. (2023). A gap analysis for automated cargo handling operations with geared vessels frequenting small sized ports. Maritime Transport Research, 5, 100098. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2023.100098
  21. Montero, V. J., Logrosa, G., Calorio, J. L., Lato, J. I., Hassall, M., & Mata, M. A. (2025). Risk modeling with Bowtie method for decision-making towards public health and safety. Safety Science, 185, 106777. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106777
  22. Onggaria, E., & Moeis, A. O. (2024). Operational Risk Management of Loading and Unloading Operations in Container Terminal Service Company. 5th South American Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Conference, 483–489. https://doi.org/10.46254/SA05.20240121
  23. Purohit, B. K., Tewari, S., Prasad, K. S. N. V., Talari, V. K., Pandey, N., Choudhury, P., & Panda, S. S. (2024). Marine oil spill clean-up: A review on technologies with recent trends and challenges. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 80, 103876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103876
  24. Putri, A. R., & Susilawati, S. (2023). Indikator Keselamatan Kerja Pada Aktivitas Bongkar Muat di Pelabuhan. Nanggroe: Jurnal Pengabdian Cendikia, 2(3), 407–414
  25. Sadeghi, S., Soltanmohammadlou, N., & Rahnamayiezekavat, P. (2021). A systematic review of scholarly works addressing crane safety requirements. Safety Science, 133, 105002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105002
  26. Saruchera, F. (2020). Determinants of effective high-risk cargo logistics at sea ports : A case study. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 14(June), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v14i0.488
  27. Silvia, S., Ihsan, T., & Rizky, I. A. (2020). Analisis Iklim Keselamatan Kerja dan Pengaruh Karakteristik Responden pada Bagian Produksi di PT. X. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 5(3)
  28. Sunaryo, & Hamka, M. A. (2017). Safety Risks Assessment on Container Terminal Using Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment and Fault Tree Analysis Methods. Procedia Engineering, 194, 307–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.150
  29. Sunitiyoso, Y., Nuraeni, S., Pambudi, N. F., Inayati, T., Nurdayat, I. F., Hadiansyah, F., & Tiara, A. R. (2022). Port performance factors and their interactions: A systems thinking approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2022.04.001
  30. Tiwari, A., & Patel, P. (2021). The Bowtie Method For Safety Management : A Literature Review. International Journal for Science and Advance Research in Technology, 7(4), 685–689
  31. Tseng, P.-H., & Pilcher, N. (2017). Maintaining and researching port safety: a case study of the port of Kaohsiung. European Transport Research Review, 9(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0250-z
  32. Verschuur, J., Koks, E. E., Li, S., & Hall, J. W. (2023). Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00656-7
  33. Walters, D., Wadsworth, E., & Bhattacharya, S. (2020). What about the workers? — Experiences of arrangements for safety and health in global container terminals. Safety Science, 121, 474–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.017
  34. Wang, T., Ding, Z., Poo, M. C., & Lau, Y.-Y. (2024). Research on Port Risk Assessment Based on Various Meteorological Disasters. In Urban Science (Vol. 8, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020051
  35. Yen, B. T. H., Huang, M.-J., Lai, H.-J., Cho, H.-H., & Huang, Y.-L. (2023). How smart port design influences port efficiency – A DEA-Tobit approach. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 46, 100862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100862

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-09-21 17:12:46

No citation recorded.