skip to main content

PENGEMBANGAN KERANGKA EVALUASI APLIKASI EDUKASI ANAK USIA DINI: INTEGRASI INDIKATOR KOGNITIF, INTERAKTIVITAS, DAN SOSIAL KONTEKSTUAL

*Lukita Yuviananda  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Ratna Sari Dewi scopus publons  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah mendorong munculnya berbagai aplikasi edukatif untuk anak usia dini (2 hingga 6 tahun). Namun, hingga saat ini sebagian besar aplikasi tersebut belum dirancang secara optimal sesuai dengan prinsip perkembangan anak, terutama dalam hal seperti beban kognitif, interaktivitas, dan sosial kontekstual. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengelompokkan indikator krusial yang seharusnya dimiliki oleh aplikasi pendidikan anak usia dini, guna mendukung proses pembelajaran yang efektif, menyenangkan dan sesuai dengan tahap perkembangan mereka. Metode yang digunakan yaitu menggabungkan literatur review, aplikasi aktual dan kuesioner berbasis expert judgement, dengan melibatkan tiga kelompok yaitu pengembang aplikasi pendidikan, guru taman kanak-kanak, dan orang tua murid. Sebanyak 55 indikator dievaluasi, dikaji serta dianalisis menggunakan pendekatan Relative Importance Index (RII). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 28 indikator dinilai penting oleh para ahli, yang kemudian hasil tersebut diklasifikasikan ke dalam tiga dimensi utama yaitu (1) faktor kognitif dan pembelajaran, (2) faktor interaktivitas dan teknologi, serta (3) faktor sosial dan kontekstual. Temuan ini menghasilkan sebuah kerangka evaluasi multidimensi yang dapat dijadikan sebagai acuan dalam perancangan dan penilaian aplikasi pendidikan anak usia dini yang lebih efektif dan sesuai dengan tahapan perkembangan anak usia dini.

  

Abstract

[Development of an Evaluation Framework for Early Childhood Educational Application: Integrating Cognitive, Interactivity and Social Contextual Aspect] The advancement of digital technology has led to the emergence of various educational applications for early childhood (age 2 to 6). However, most of these applications have not been optimally designed in accordance with child development principles, particularly regarding cognitive load, interactivity, and socio contextual aspects. This study aims to identify and categorize the key indicators that should be incorporated into early childhood educational applications to support effective, enjoyable, and developmentally appropriate learning experiences. The method combines a literature review, analysis of existing applications, and an expert judgement based questionnaire involving three groups such as educational application  developers, kindergarten teachers, and parents. A total of 55 indicators were evaluated and analyzed using the Relative Importance Index (RII) approach. The findings reveal that 30 indicators were rated as important by the experts, which were then classified into three main dimensions such as (1) cognitive and learning factors, (2) interactivity and technology factors, and (3) social and contextual factors. These results form a multidimensional evaluation framework that can serve as a reference for designing and assessing early childhood educational applications that are more effective and aligned with children’s developmental stages.

Keywords: cognitive load; early childhood educational application; interactivity; multidimensional evaluation; social context

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: aplikasi pendidikan anak usia dini; beban kognitif; evaluasi multidimensi; interaktivitas; konteks sosial

Article Metrics:

  1. Amaefule, C. O., Breitwieser, J., Biedermann, D., Nobbe, L., Drachsler, H., & Brod, G. (2023). Fostering Children’s Acceptance of Educational Apps: The importance of designing enjoyable learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1351–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13314
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik., (2024). Profile Anak Usia Dini
  3. Chatzopoulos, A., Karaflis, A., Kalogiannakis, M., Tzerachoglou, A., Cheirchanteri, G., Sfyroera, E., & Sklavounou, E.-O. (2023). Evaluation Of Google Play Educational Apps for Early Childhood Education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 770–778. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.02.004
  4. Chen, K. (2022). An Interactive Design Framework for Children’s Apps for Enhancing Emotional Experience. Interacting with Computers, 34(3), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac042
  5. Hansen, S. (2024). Faktor Penghambat Perkembangan Industri Konstruksi di Indonesia. TEKNIK, 45(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.14710/teknik.v45i2.62677
  6. Huntington, B., Goulding, J., & Pitchford, N. J. (2023). Pedagogical Features of Interactive Apps for Effective Learning of Foundational Skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1273–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13317
  7. Meyer, M., Zosh, J. M., McLaren, C., Robb, M., McCaffery, H., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Radesky, J. (2021a). How Educational Are “Educational” Apps for Young Children? App Store Content Analysis Using The Four Pillars of Learning Framework. Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 526–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516
  8. Mukarromah, T. T., & Agustina, P. (2021). Gamifikasi Berbasis Aplikasi dan Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini. Edukids: Jurnal Pertumbuhan, Perkembangan, Dan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 18(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.17509/edukids.v18i1.33338
  9. Nicmanis, M. (2024). Reflexive Content Analysis: An Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis, Reduction, and Description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241236603
  10. Pathan, F., Lowlesh Yadav, M., & Deharkar, A. (2024). HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION (HCI). www.irjmets.com
  11. Setiowati, A., Nuryanto, I. L., & Kurniawan, D. E. (2024). The Role of Parents in Early Childhood Emotional Development Strategies. AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 4, 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.3784
  12. Strataki, A. (2022). An Evaluation of Educational Apps for Preschool-age Children in Android and iOS. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.012
  13. Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive Load Theory and Individual Differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423
  14. Taylor, G., Kolak, J., Bent, E. M., & Monaghan, P. (2022). Selecting Educational Apps for Preschool Children: How Useful are Website App Rating Systems? British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1262–1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13199
  15. Taylor, G., Kolak, J., Norgate, S. H., & Monaghan, P. (2022). Assessing The Educational Potential and Language Content of Touchscreen Apps for Preschool Children. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100102
  16. Vaiopoulou, J., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., Kalogiannakis, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2023a). Classification and Evaluation of Educational Apps for Early Childhood: Security Matters. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2547–2578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11289-w
  17. Wirth, A., Mues, A., Birtwistle, E., & Niklas, F. (2024). Evaluating Educational Apps for Preschoolers: Differences and Agreements Between The Assessments of Experts, Parents, and Their Children. Computers in Human Behavior, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108361

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-02-02 09:22:07

No citation recorded.