skip to main content

PEMODELAN FAKTOR PENENTU KINERJA KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA (K3) BERBASIS STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING (SEM)

*Moiko Sivatino  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Adhitya Sudiarno  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Penerapan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) yang efektif menjadi kebutuhan strategis bagi PT XYZ sebagai perusahaan industri berisiko tinggi. Permasalahan K3 di perusahaan masih ditandai oleh adanya insiden kerja, lemahnya budaya pengawasan, dan belum optimalnya keterlibatan pekerja dalam kegiatan keselamatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kinerja keselamatan kerja, meliputi pengawasan, pengakuan kepada karyawan, motivasi kerja, partisipasi, dan lingkungan kerja. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Data diperoleh melalui kuesioner kepada 150 responden dari total populasi 467 pekerja PT XYZ dan dianalisis menggunakan SmartPLS melalui uji validitas, reliabilitas, model pengukuran, dan model struktural. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengakuan kepada karyawan, partisipasi, dan lingkungan kerja berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja keselamatan, sedangkan pengawasan tidak berpengaruh langsung secara signifikan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa peningkatan kinerja keselamatan perlu diarahkan pada penguatan pengakuan karyawan, partisipasi aktif pekerja, dan perbaikan lingkungan kerja melalui penerapan program 5R secara berkelanjutan.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext |  Rebuttal Form
Rebuttal Form – Manuscript ID 84165 – Round 1
Subject Response to Reviewer Comments
Type Rebuttal Form
  Download (2MB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: K3; pengawasan; pengakuan kepada karyawan; motivasi kerja; kinerja keselamatan

Article Metrics:

  1. Ajmal, M., Isha, A. S. N., Nordin, S. M., & Al-Mekhlafi, A.-B. A. (2022). Safety-management practices and the occurrence of occupational accidents: Assessing the mediating role of safety compliance. Sustainability, 14(8), 4569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084569
  2. Burke, W. Warner, (2007). Organizational Development. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company
  3. Hair, Joseph & Hult, G. Tomas M. & Ringle, Christian & Sarstedt, Marko. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)
  4. Hermanto, B., Syahrul, L., & Yulihasri, Y. (2023). The influence of organizational culture, work environment, and competence on safety health occupation (SHO) laboratory employees with safety behavior as a mediation variable. Journal of Social Research, 2(8), 2773–2789. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i8.1335
  5. Ilham, N., & Ikhtiar, M. (2022). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Kesehatan Keselamatan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PLN ULP Panakkukang Makassar. Window of Public Health Journal, 3(2), 359-369
  6. ILO & OECD. (2022). Decent work and responsible business practices in Indonesia’s electronics manufacturing sector. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/
  7. Kaassis, B., & Badri, A. (2018). Development of a Preliminary Model for Evaluating Occupational Health and Safety Risk Management Maturity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Safety, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4010005
  8. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2023). The Indonesian OSH profile 2022. Direktorat Jenderal Pembinaan Pengawasan Ketenagakerjaan dan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. https://kemnaker.go.id/
  9. Lafuente, E., & Abad, J. (2021). Territorial efficiency: Analysis of the role of public work safety controls. Safety Science, 134, 105074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105074
  10. Lornudd, C., Frykman, M., Stenfors, T., Ebbevi, D., Hasson, H., Sundberg, C. J., & Von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2021). A champagne tower of influence: An interview study of how corporate boards enact occupational health and safety. Safety Science, 143, 105416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105416
  11. Nurhayati, A., Purnama, L. B., Pujiono, & Aripin, S. (2022). Structural Equation Modeling using Partial Least Squares for Occupational Safety and Health Factors and Work Environment Factors Toward Occupational Diseases on Labors in Industry X Cimahi City. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(E), 1779–1783
  12. Milošević, I., Stojanović, A., Nikolić, Đ., Mihajlović, I., Brkić, A., Perišić, M., & Spasojević-Brkić, V. (2025). Occupational health and safety performance in a changing mining environment: Identification of critical factors. Safety Science, 184, 106745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106745
  13. Mowbray, P. K., Gu, J., Chen, Z., Tse, H. H. M., & Wilkinson, A. (2024). How do tangible and intangible rewards encourage employee voice? The perspective of dual proactive motivational pathways. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(15), 2569–2601. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2024.2353660
  14. Puspitasari, M. D. (2024). Effects of financial incentives, performance appraisal, and employee recognition on work motivation of start-up employee. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(2), 1812–1823. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v5i2.742
  15. Putri, A. H., Latief, Y., Sagita, L., & Machfudiyanto, R. A. (2021). Developing Standard Operational Procedures for Maintenance and Repair of Mechanical and Electrical Component in Government Building to Improving Safety Planning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1858(1), 012082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1858/1/012082
  16. Sakalli, A. E., & Arikan, S. (2024). The relationship of Value dimensions in Turk Society with fatalistic tendencies, safety motivation, risk perception and safety performance. Heliyon, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30384
  17. Sakuraya, A., Iida, M., Imamura, K., Ando, E., Arima, H., Asaoka, H., Eguchi, H., Hidaka, Y., Hino, A., Inoue, A., Inoue, R., Iwanaga, M., Kobayashi, Y., Komase, Y., Otsuka, Y., Sasaki, N., Shimazu, A., Tsuno, K., Watanabe, K., … Tsutsumi, A. (2023). A proposed definition of participatory organizational interventions. Journal of Occupational Health, 65(1), e12386. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12386
  18. Sulistyaningrum, V., Malau, A. G., Sitompul, A. M., Sumali, B., & Fahrudin, I. (2024). The influence of occupational health, safety and work environment on performance through risk management at PIP Semarang. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS), 6(1), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i1
  19. Wibowo, P. H., & Waty, M. (2023). Occupational Health And Safety System Development At Indonesia Representative Council Building Using Structural Equation Modeling. Jurnal Infrastruktur, 10(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v10i1.5888
  20. Won, S., Choi, J., & Kim, K. (2024). Development of sustainable industrial safety and health policy for electronic industry in Korea: A study on the relationship between safety leadership of managers, safety climate, and safety behavior. Sustainability, 16(23), 10308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310308
  21. Yang, T., Jiang, X., & Cheng, H. (2022). Employee recognition, task performance, and OCB: Mediated and moderated by pride. Sustainability, 14(3), 1631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031631
  22. Yudiningtyas, L. A., & Winarko, R. (2024). Kinerja pegawai: Peran motivasi dalam pengaruh komitmen dan lingkungan kerja. Jurnal Inspirasi Ilmu Manajemen, 3(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.32897/jiim.2024.3.1.3703
  23. Yughi, S. A., Widodo, A. S., & Arsid (2022). Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Kiat Pangan Persada. Scientific Journal of Reflection, 5(3), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v5i3.517
  24. Zhang, H., Liu, Z., Wei, L., & Chen, T. (2024). Framework for construction of a Safety and Health Management System in electric vehicle (EV) enterprises. Safety Science, 170, 106536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106536
  25. Zhao, L., Yang, D., Liu, S., & Nkrumah, E. N. K. (2022). The effect of safety leadership on safety participation of employee: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 827694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827694

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-30 16:04:07

No citation recorded.