skip to main content

THE POTENCY OF SUMBA ONGOLE (SO) CATTLE: A STUDY OF GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION AND CARCASS PRODUCTIVITY

*P. P. Agung  -  Research Center for Biotechnology-Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia
S. Anwar  -  Research Center for Biotechnology-Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia
A. S. Wulandari  -  Research Center for Biotechnology-Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia
A. Sudiro  -  PT. Karya Anugerah Rumpin (PT. KAR), Indonesia
S. Said  -  Research Center for Biotechnology-Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia
B. Tappa  -  Research Center for Biotechnology-Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
A study was conducted to assess the genetic characterization of the Sumba Ongole (SO) cattlebased on DNA microsatellites and also to study the potency of SO cattle based on carcass productivity.Blood samples were collected from 28 individual cattle and 12 microsatellite primers as recommendedby FAO were used to identify the genetic characterization of the SO cattle population. Data of carcassproductivity were collected from 506 individual cattle that slaughtered in Karawaci abattoir, Banten,Indonesia. The heterozygosity values of microsatellite loci ranged from 0.143 to 1.000 (mean 0.536).The highest PIC values was 0.814 (locus TGLA122), while the lowest was 0.280 (locus BM1818).Cattle in range of 351-475 kg slaughter weight was most slaughtered in year 2013 and 2014 with carcasspercentage ranged from 52.89% to 53.43%. The highest carcass percentage (56.34%) was obtained fromcattle in range of 626-650 kg slaughter weight while the lowest (51.42%) was obtained from cattle inrange of 250-275 kg slaughter weight. The results of genetic characterization showed that allmicrosatellite locus were highly polymorphic and highly informative for detecting the level of geneticdiversity in the SO cattle population. The results of carcass productivity showed that the SO cattle hasexcellent potential as beef cattle compare with other local breeds cattle in Indonesia.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: genetic; characterization; Sumba Ongole; carcass; beef cattle potency

Article Metrics:

Last update:

  1. Population diversity, admixture, and demographic trend of the Sumba Ongole cattle based on genomic data

    Pita Sudrajad, Hartati Hartati, Bayu Dewantoro Putro Soewandi, Saiful Anwar, Angga Ardhati Rani Hapsari, Tri Satya Mastuti Widi, Sigit Bintara, Dyah Maharani. Animal Bioscience, 37 (4), 2024. doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0289
  2. The role of biotechnology in animal production

    S Said, P P Agung, W P B Putra, E M Kaiin. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 492 (1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012035
  3. Comparison of horned, polled Bali cattle and Banteng based on microsatellite markers

    MUHAMMAD IHSAN ANDI DAGONG, PASKAH PARTOGI AGUNG, FERDY SAPUTRA, ZULKHARNAIM ZULKHARNAIM, SYAHRUDDIN SAID, EKAYANTI MULYAWATI KAIIN, MOCH SYAMSUL ARIFIN ZEIN. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 93 (10), 2023. doi: 10.56093/ijans.v93i10.131844
  4. Association of Calpain gene with carcass percentage in Sumba Ongole cattle

    P. P. Agung, S. Said, E. M. Kaiin, M. Gunawan, N. D. Yanthi, N. Herlina, T. Maulana, F. Saputra. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICAST 2021), 2628 , 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0143987
  5. Runs of homozygosity analysis and genomic inbreeding estimation in Sumba Ongole cattle (Bos indicus) using a BovineSNP50K BeadChip

    Widya Pintaka Bayu Putra, Hartati Hartati, Redi Aditama, Eko Handiwirawan, Endang Tri Margawati, Simon Elieser. Veterinary World, 2024. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1914-1919
  6. Integrated livestock business and industry in Indonesia

    Syahruddin Said. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 465 (1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/465/1/012003

Last update: 2024-10-31 16:21:12

  1. Association of growth hormone (gh) gene polymorphism with growth and carcass in sumba ongole (so) cattle

    Agung P.. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 42 (3), 2017. doi: 10.14710/jitaa.42.3.153-159
  2. Breeding value of sires based on offspring weaning weight as a recommendation for selecting kebumen ongole grade cattle

    Sumadi. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 42 (3), 2017. doi: 10.14710/jitaa.42.3.160-166
  3. The role of biotechnology in animal production

    S Said, P P Agung, W P B Putra, E M Kaiin. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 492 (1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012035
  4. Sex sorting sperm of sumba Ongole bulls by using snakehead fish (Channa striata) albumin extract

    Maulana T.. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 44 (1), 2019. doi: 10.14710/jitaa.41.1.106-113
  5. Estimation of most probable producing ability value for calf birth's performance in sumba Ongole cows

    Said S.. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 41 (2), 2016. doi: 10.14710/jitaa.41.2.53-60
  6. Short communication: Molecular characteristic of taro white cattle based on DNA microsatellite markers

    Heryani L.. Biodiversitas, 20 (3), 2019. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d200308
  7. Novel Single Nucleoλλde Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Intron 2 and Exon 3 Regions of Lepλλn Gene in Sumba Ongole Caλλle

    Putra W.P.B.. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 10 (2), 2020.
  8. Integrated livestock business and industry in Indonesia

    Syahruddin Said. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 465 (1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/465/1/012003
  9. Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in the sumba ongole (Bos indicus) growth hormone gene

    Agung P.. Biodiversitas, 19 (2), 2018. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190240
  10. Selection of Sumba Ongole (SO) cattle based on breeding value and performance test

    Said S.. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 41 (4), 2016. doi: 10.14710/jitaa.41.4.175-187
  11. Genetic diversity of Indonesian cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers

    Agung P.. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 32 (4), 2019. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0283