DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jmki.4.1.2016.35-43

Implementasi Program Pengendalian Penyakit Demam Berdarah Dengue (P2DBD) di Wilayah Kota Medan

*Rapotan Hasibuan  -  Program Studi Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Sri Suwitri  -  Program Doktor Ilmu Adminsitrasi Publik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Sutopo Patria Jati  -  Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

An incidence rate (IR) and a case fatality rate (CFR) of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DHF) in Medan City tended to increase since 2012. This might be due to a problem in implementing DHF Disease Control Program (P2DBD). The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of factors of communication, attitude, health centres’ characteristics, understanding of a standard and a target, resource, and environment towards the success of the P2DBD implementation program in Medan City. This was an observational study using a cross-sectional approach. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and observation followed by conducting indepth interview for qualitative data. Number of respondents were 39 DHF officers working at all main health centres in Medan City. Furthermore, data were analysed using a technique of structural equation model (SEM) processed by a software of visual partial least square (VPLS). The results of this research showed that most of the respondents had very good communication (66.7%), positive attitude in supporting the program (82.1%), good characteristics of health centres (84.6%), good understanding of a standard and a target (66.7%), good resource (74.4%), conducive environment (76.9%), and good implementation of P2DBD (51.3%), a moderate level. Bivariate analysis demonstrated that communication and environment influenced the implementation. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the implementation could be explained by the factors of communication, attitude, health centres’ characteristics, standard and target, resource, and environment equal to 67.4%. The R 2 value was included as a substantial category in which the most influenced factor was the environment. District Health Office needs to regularly conduct training of DHF case management, to supervise a program at health centres, and to initiate the existence of cadres for monitoring mosquito wrigglers. Health workers need to motivate, to persuasively ask a community, and to coordinate revitalisation of a DHF working group.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Program P2DBD; Implementasi kebijakan; Puskesmas; P2DBD Program; Policy Implementation; Public Health Centre

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Analisis Faktor-faktor Motivasional yang Berhubungan dengan Kinerja Bidan Desa dalam Pembinaan Kader Posyandu di Kabupaten Aceh Barat Tahun 2014 Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Penilaian Rumah Sehat Untuk Evaluasi Bidang Penyehatan Lingkungan dan Promosi Kesehatan di Dinas Kesehatan Kota Pontianak Evaluasi Implementasi Pelayanan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional pada Balai Kesehatan Paru Masyarakat (BKPM) Wilayah Semarang Terikat Kerjasama Dengan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Kesehatan More recent articles
Most cited articles
Remaja Sebagai Penggerak Utama dalam Implementasi Program Kesehatan Remaja Implementation on the Referral System of High Risk Pregnant Women from Villages Midwives to Primary Healthcare Center with Basic Obstetric and Neonatal Emergency Care in Banjar District, South Kalimantan (a Case Study in Sungkai Primary Healthcare Center) Analisis Pelaksanaan Program Kemitraan Bidan dan Dukun Ditinjau Dari Aspek Input, Proses dan Output di Wilayah Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Fakfak Provinsi Papua Barat Evaluasi Kinerja Sistem Informasi Manajemen Farmasi Di Rs Roemani Muhammadiyah Dengan Metode Hot Fit Model Evaluation on the Implementation of Maternal and Child Health Service Reporting by Coordinator Midwives at Primary Healthcare Centers in Nabire District, Papua Province More cited articles
  1. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan. Modul Pengendalian Demam Berdarah Dengue. Jakarta: 2011
  2. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Pengendalian Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan Tahun 2014. Jakarta: 2015
  3. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Waspada DBD di Musim Pancaroba. Available at: http://www.depkes.go.id/article/ print/15010200002/waspada-dbd-di-musimpancaroba.html. Accessed 19 February, 2015
  4. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Laporan Tahunan 2014 Pengendalian & Pemberantasan Demam Berdarah Dengue (P2DBD), P2 Malaria, P2 Rabies, P2 Filariasis dan P2 Kecacingan. Medan
  5. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Medan. Laporan Bulanan Kasus Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD). Medan: 2014
  6. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Profil Kesehatan Sumatera Utara Tahun 2013. Medan: 2013
  7. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 75 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat. Jakarta: 2014
  8. Nugroho, R. Public Policy. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo; 2012
  9. Anggraini, FD. Analisis Implementasi Program Deteksi Dini Kanker Serviks Melalui Pemeriksaan IVA (Inspeksi Visual Asam Asetat) di Puskesmas Wilayah Kota Surabaya. Semarang: Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Diponegoro; 2013
  10. Chadijah S, Rosmini, Halimuddin. Peningkatan Peranserta Masyarakat dalam Pelaksanaan Pemberantasan Sarang Nyamuk DBD (PSN-DBD) di Dua Kelurahan di Kota Palu, Sulawesi Tengah. Media Litbang Kesehatan 2011; 21(4):183-190
  11. Zubaedah, IS. Hubungan Faktor-Faktor Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Kinerja Petugas Pokja DBD Tingkat Kelurahan di Kota Tasikmalaya. Semarang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro; 2007
  12. Edward III, G. Implementing Public Policy. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.; 1980

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-18 20:26:59

No citation recorded.