DOI: https://doi.org/10.21456/vol15iss1pp1-10

Penentuan Prioritas Persediaan Barang dengan Menggunakan Hybrid Method

Muhammad Satria Aldino  -  Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia
*Sulis Sandiwarno orcid scopus  -  Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 JSINBIS (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis)

Citation Format:
Abstract

Warehouse is a facility that serves as storage of goods or products. Inventory of goods has an impact on the continuity of the construction project, because if the material runs out, the contractor cannot carry out the work, as a result the project may be delayed from the predetermined schedule. The purpose of the warehouse is to monitor and control the incoming or outgoing materials in a project. In previous studies, an analysis of the AHP and TOPSIS methods has been carried out, but AHP has problems when used in cases with a large number of criteria and alternatives. While TOPSIS has problems in determining the value of the criteria because it is too subjective. Therefore, in this study we propose a hybrid method for calculating DSS which is called “Analytical Hierarchy – Similarity to Ideal Process” (AH-SIP). This proposed method has goals, namely in determining the value of the criteria with a comparison matrix using AHP, and performing alternative rankings using TOPSIS. The results of this study in determining the best material recommendations for procurement are D 25 Threaded Iron with a preference of 0.777, Chicken Wire with a preference of 0.677, and Pilox with a preference of 0.669.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Decision Support System; Material Inventory; AHP; TOPSIS

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Prediksi Churn Pelanggan Telekomunikasi dengan Optimalisasi Seleksi Fitur dan Tuning Hyperparameter pada Algoritma Klasifikasi C4.5 The Impact of The Utilization of Electronic Payment Moderated by Financial Technology Innovation on Financial Technology Payment in Indonesia Integrasi Model DeLone & McLean, UTAUT, dan HOT-Fit untuk Menilai Keberhasilan dan Keberterimaan Aplikasi LPD Mobile di Bali Benefits and Challenges of ERP Implementation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review Komparasi COBIT 2019 dan ISO 27001 Terhadap Audit ISO 21001 untuk Akurasi Rekomendasi Audit SI/TI Pendidikan More recent articles
Most cited articles
Pengenalan Wajah dengan Matriks Kookurensi Aras Keabuan dan Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan Probabilistik Performance Dashboard pada Rumah Sakit Islam Aplikasi Penentuan Tarif Listrik Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Sugeno Metode Quality Function Deployment Dan Fuzzy Topsis Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Perusahaan Penyedia Jasa Internet Penerapan Green Supply Chain Management Untuk Peningkatan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan More cited articles
  1. Agusli, R., Dzulhaq, M. I., & Irawan, F. C., 2020. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS. Academic Journal of Computer Science Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.38101/ajcsr.v2i2.286
  2. Al-Marom, M. A., & Wibisono, S., 2021. Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Rekomendasi Kelulusan dan Pemeringkatan Santri Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS. Jurnal Ilmiah Media Sisfo, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.33998/mediasisfo.2021.15.1.998
  3. Ayulestari, I., Farlina, Y., Yulistria, R., & Susilawati, D., 2019. Pemilihan Guru Favorit Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) di Mi mWB Pui At-Tahdhiriyyah. Swabumi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31294/swabumi.v7i2.6639
  4. Beti, I. Y., 2019. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v11i3.480.252-259
  5. Chamid, A. A., & Murti, A. C., 2017. Kombinasi Metode AHP Dan TOPSIS Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Prosiding SNATIF Ke -4 Tahun 2017
  6. Hidayat, C. R., Mufizar, T., & Ramdani, M. D., 2018. Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Karyawan Bpjs Kesehatan Tasikmalaya. Konferensi Nasional Sistem Informasi 2018, September
  7. Kochovski, P., Drobintsev, P. D., & Stankovski, V., 2019. Formal Quality of Service assurances, ranking and verification of cloud deployment options with a probabilistic model checking method. Information and Software Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.01.003
  8. Kurnia, V. A., Erianda, A., & Meidelfi, D., 2020. Perancangan Website untuk Menentukan Produk Paling Banyak Terjual di Bengkel Man Motor Metode TOPSIS. Ultima InfoSys : Jurnal Ilmu Sistem Informasi, 11(2), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.31937/si.v11i2.1756
  9. Nugroho, A., & Eliyani, 2021. Framework to Sell Item in Online Marketplace in Indonesia. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 9(1)
  10. Pendiagnosa, A., Warna, K., Pemrograman, M., Delphi, B., & Eniyati, S., 2011. Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.35315/dinamik.v16i2.364
  11. Rahayu, S., Gumilang, A. J. T., Bharodin, O. P., & Faturahman, F., 2020. Metode Entropy-SAW dan Metode Entropy-WASPAS dalam Menentukan Promosi Jabatan Bagi Karyawan Terbaik di Cudo Communications. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2020712888
  12. Rusdianto, D., Kom, M., & Nurdesni, A., 2017. Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier pada Apotek dengan Metode AHP dan SAW (Studi Kasus Apotek XYZ). Sisfotek, 3584
  13. Sandiwarno, S., 2021. Empirical lecturers’ and students’ sa1. Sandiwarno S. Empirical lecturers’ and students’ satisfaction assessment in e-learning systems based on the usage metrics. REID (Research Eval Educ. 2021;7(2).tisfaction assessment in e-learning systems based on the. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v7i2.39642
  14. Sandiwarno, S., Niu, Z., & Selemani Nyamawe, A., 2023. A novel hybrid machine learning model for analyzing e-learning users’ satisfaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2209986
  15. Sandiwarno, S., & Wardhana, A., 2019. Measurement of Learning Evaluation Against Assisted by Laboratory Assistants. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v67i8p111
  16. SAS, A., Andi Muh Akbar Saputra, & Muh Fadli Fausi Sahlan, 2022. Pengembangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penelusuran Minat Bakat Siswa SMP Dalam Memilih Jurusan di SMK Berbasis Web. Jurnal Fokus Elektroda : Energi Listrik, Telekomunikasi, Komputer, Elektronika Dan Kendali), 7(3). https://doi.org/10.33772/jfe.v7i3.1
  17. Satyagraha, A., Witanti, W., & Ashaury, H., 2020. Pembanngunan Sistem Informasi Monitoring Logistik di PT Dirgantara Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 1(1)
  18. Lemantara, J., Setiawan, N. A., & Aji, M. N., 2013. Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode AHP dan Promethee. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro Dan Teknologi Informasi, 2(1)
  19. Steven, Setiawan, V., & Agung, H., 2020. Implementasi Metode TOPSIS untuk Rekomendasi dalam Menentukan Pengadaan Barang pada PT. Sentra Kemika Persada. KALBISCIENTIA Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.53008/kalbiscientia.v6i2.41
  20. Tobing, F. A. T., Dzulhaq, M. I., & Sidiq, R. F., 2020. Penerapan Metode Fuzzy AHP untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pemasok Terbaik. Ultima Computing : Jurnal Sistem Komputer, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.31937/sk.v11i2.1455
  21. Yudara, I. G., & Sugiartawan, P., 2019. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Pegawai Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy AHP. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer Terapan Indonesia (JSIKTI), 1(4)
  22. Zytoon, M. A., 2020. A Decision Support Model for Prioritization of Regulated Safety Inspections Using Integrated Delphi, AHP and Double-Hierarchical TOPSIS Approach. IEEE Access, 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991179

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-03-11 10:12:38

No citation recorded.