skip to main content

Analisis Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah (SIMDA) dengan Metode Delone dan Mclean Success Model dan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

*Arie Vatresia orcid publons  -  Informatics, Indonesia
Tini Pasaribu  -  Information System, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 JSINBIS (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis)

Citation Format:
Abstract

Eight years since the implementation of the Regional Management Information System (SIMDA), there has been no specific research to analyze the information system both in terms of implementation, system quality, user acceptance, and the success of the system in its implementation. This study aims to determine the success of implementing the program at the Bengkulu Provincial DPMD office using the DeLone And McLean IS Success Model and Technology Accepeance Model (TAM) with seven research variables (system quality, information quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, service quality, user satisfaction, and net benefits). Furthermore, this research provides recommendations that can be used to update SIMDA so that it suits user needs. The seven variables of this study resulted in twelve proposed hypotheses (six were rejected and another was accepted). Six paths of accepted hypothetical relationships are: system quality with ease of use; relationship between information quality and perceived usefulness; relationship between information quality and net benefits; relationship between service quality and perceived ease of use; relationship between perceived ease of use and user satisfaction; and relationship between perceived usefulness and user satisfaction. Meanwhile, the relationship path of the rejected hypotheses is the relationship between system quality and perceived usefulness, the relationship between system quality and net benefits, the relationship between information quality and perceived ease of use, the relationship between service quality and user satisfaction, the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, and the relationship between user satisfaction and net benefits.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
File Kuisioner
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (120KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Success Analysis; DeLone And McLean IS Success Model; SIMDA; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Article Metrics:

  1. Amali, L. N., Katili, M. R., Suhada, S., Hadjaratie, L., 2020. The measurement of maturity level of information technology service based on COBIT 5 framework. Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control) 18(1). https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.V18I1.10582
  2. Amali, L. N., Katili, M. R., Suhada, S., Hadjaratie, L., Mardlatillah, H., 2022. Technology acceptance model in government context: a systematic review on the implementation of IT governance in a government institution. Jurnal Online Informatika 7(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v7i1.853
  3. Ananda, F., Sari, M. P., 2020. Pengaruh implementasi sistem informasi manajemen daerah (SIMDA) keuangan terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan (studi pada lingkungan dinas kesehatan kabupaten padang pariaman). Jurnal Pundi 04(02). https://doi.org/10.31575/jp.v4i2.214
  4. Ayutrisula, A. F., 2020. Analisis penerapan e-ticketing bioskop terhadap minat pembelian tiket dengan menggunakan structural equation modeling partial least square (SEM PLS). UIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya
  5. Bpkp.go.id., 2021. Pengenalan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah (SIMDA)
  6. De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., Debreceny, R. S., 2013. COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems 27(1). https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50422
  7. Dečman, M., 2015. Understanding technology acceptance of government information systems from employees’ perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 11(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2015100104
  8. Devos, J., Van De Ginste, K., 2015. Towards a theoretical foundation of IT governance: the COBIT 5 case. Electronic Journal of Information System Evaluation 18(2)
  9. Fauzi, Irviani, R., Jatiningrum, C., Halim, A., Supriyadi., 2019. Financial management information system within government institution and supply chain strategy: Implementation Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Supply Chain Management 8(3)
  10. Hamid, M. I., Hanapi, P., Hussin, N., 2018. Technology trust for government and private sector: approach technologies acceptance model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i12/3709
  11. Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S., 2010. Design research in information systems. Ais 22, 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8
  12. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., Ram, S., 2004. Design science in information systems research 1. Design Science in IS Research MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
  13. Isaias, P., Issa, T., 2015. High level models and methodologies for information systems. 1–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9254-2
  14. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., Pal, D., 2015. Likert scale: explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975
  15. Junaidi., 2010. Tabel r (koefisien korelasi sederhana)
  16. Kurniawan, H., 2019. Pengukuran keberhasilan sistem informasi dengan pendekatan delone and mclean IS success model dan TAM (studi kasus: sistem informasi akademik (SIAKAD). Universitas Sahid, Jakarta 2, 1–13
  17. Lazuardi, L. I., 2017. Pengaruh kesiapan penerimaan pengguna terhadap penerapan sistem informasi diantara lembaga keuangan mikro syariah. Thesis, UIN Syarifhidayatullah, Jakarta
  18. Maratade, E. M., 2021. Prosedur pencairan dana ganti uang persediaan pada sekretariat dewan perwakilan rakyat daerah kabupaten kepulauan talaud. Thesis, Universitas Katolik De La Salle, Manado
  19. Mircioiu, C., Atkinson, J., 2017. A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods applied to a likert scale. Pharmacy 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy5020026
  20. Khani, N., Nor, K. M., Hakimpoor, H., Bahrami, M., Salavati, S., 2011. IS/IT capability and strategic information system planning (SISP) success. International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT) 3(3), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmit.2011.3303
  21. Natakusumah, K., Maulina, E., Muftiadi, A., Purnomo, M., 2023. Integrating religiosity into a technology acceptance model for the adoption of mobile payment technology. International Journal of Data and Network Science 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.10.003
  22. Naudy, S. A., 2020. Pengukuran kesuksesan penerapan e-filling menggunakan model kesuksesan delone and mclean extend variable (studi kasus: KPP pratama pondik aren). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta 21(1), 19
  23. Park, E. S., Park, M. S., 2020. Factors of the technology acceptance model for construction IT. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 10(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228299
  24. Apsari, I. A. P., Astika, I. B. P., 2020. Pengaruh kualitas informasi, kualitas sistem informasi, dan perceived usefulness pada kepuasan pengguna SIMDA. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 30(3), 611-623. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i03.p05
  25. Rahayu, F. S., Budiyanto, D., Palyama, D., 2017. Analisis penerimaan e-learning menggunakan technology acceptance model (TAM) (Studi Kasus: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta). Jurnal Terapan Teknologi Informasi 1(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.21460/jutei.2017.12.20
  26. Rakhmawati, I., 2022. Analisa simda-next generation (SIMDA-NG). Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v7i1.168
  27. Rimawati, E., Vulandari, R. T., Prabowo, I. A., 2018. Analisis technology acceptance model dalam pemanfaatan internet sebagai media belajar siswa. Universitas Islam Batik, Surakarta 70–82
  28. Rofianingsih, D., Sarjono, H., 2019. Analisa terhadap loyalitas pelanggan portable grill dan shabu tangerang. 2, 147–160
  29. Setyawan, R. A., Atapukan, W. F., 2018. Pengukuran usability website e-commerce sambal nyoss menggunakan metode skala likert. Universitas Janabadra, Yogyakarta 7(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.28989/compiler.v7i1.254
  30. Shim, J. P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J. F., Power, D. J., Sharda, R., Carlsson, C., 2002. Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems 33(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00139-7
  31. Supandi, E. D., Mutmainatus S, S., 2020. Pengaruh remunerasi dan motivasi terhadap kinerja pegawai UIN sunan kalijaga dengan SEM. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 3(1178), 84–94
  32. Winarno, W. A., Putra, H. S., 2020. Technology acceptance model of the Indonesian government financial reporting information systems. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2020.105089
  33. Xu, M. L., Leung, S. O., 2018. Effects of varying numbers of Likert scale points on factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12214

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-06-12 14:57:49

No citation recorded.