skip to main content

The Influence Of Behavior Through Safety Culture On Seafarers’ Performance On Merchant Ship

*Mudiyanto Mudiyanto orcid scopus  -  Universitas Hang Tuah, Indonesia
Elva Febriana Anggraeny  -  Universitas Hang Tuah, Indonesia
Fawwaz Jalesveva Ulhaq Widodo  -  Universitas Hang Tuah, Indonesia
Received: 17 Mar 2025; Published: 3 Jul 2026.
Editor(s): Samuel Samuel
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the behavior of ship crews in implementing a safety culture towards performance on merchant ships..This study uses a quantitative approach to analyze the influence of behavior through safety culture on seafarers' performance on merchant ships. The sample used in this study consisted of 100 respondents, selected using a sampling technique using simple random sampling. The data was collected, the analysis was carried out using SmartPLS software to analyze complex structural models, including measuring the causal relationship between variables.The findings in this studySafety culture as a mediator has a significant influence on the relationship between behavioral variables and seafarer performance, namely by translating behavior into safety actions.This study contributes by revealing that consistent implementation of safety culture can form positive behaviors that significantly improve seafarers' operational performance and reduce the risk of accidents in the maritime sector. This study is different from previous studies that analyzed safety culture in the organizational sector, but this study analyzes safety culture on seafarers' performance in the maritime sector. The practical implications of this study are that shipping companies and port authorities need to strengthen safety culture through continuous training and implementation of regulations so that they can improve seafarers' performance and reduce accidents at sea.

Fulltext Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

  1. E. Etman and A. Halawa, "Safety culture, the cure for human error: A critique,"8th Annu. Gen. Asem. 2007 - Int. Assoc. Marit. Univ., pp. 115–125, 2020
  2. N. Hasanspahić, V. Frančić, S. Vujičić, and M. Mandušić, “Safety leadership as a means for safe and sustainable shipping,”Sustain., vol. 13, no. 14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13147841
  3. EMSA, “Annual overview of marine casualties and incidents 2021,” 2021
  4. C. Liu, “Human–machine cooperation research for navigation of maritime autonomous surface ships: A review and consideration,”Ocean Engineering, vol. 246. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110555
  5. E.E. Mitropoulos, “Challenges for the International Maritime Organization in the 21st Century,”NATSHIP, 2004. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved June 5, 2008, 2004. http://www.imo.org/Newsroom/%0Amainframe.asp?topic_id=847&doc_id=3741
  6. PD Nguyen, CX Dang, and LD Nguyen, “Would Better Earnings, Work Environment, and Promotion of Opportunities Increase Employee Performance? An Investigation in State and Other Sectors in Vietnam,"Public Organ. Rev., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 565–579, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11115-014-0289-4
  7. MJ Akhtar and IB Utne, “Human fatigue's effect on the risk of maritime groundings - A Bayesian Network modeling approach,”Saf. Sci., vol. 62, pp. 427–440, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.002
  8. E. Bal BeşİkÇİ, L. Tavacıoğlu, and özcan Arslan, “The subjective measurement of seafarers' fatigue levels and mental symptoms,”Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 329–343, 2016, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1047426
  9. Fanet al., “The role of the prefrontal cortex and functional connectivity during maritime operations: an fNIRS study. Brain Behav 2021;11:e01910.,” Brand Behav, 2021
  10. EP Massami and MM Manyasi, "Analysis of determinants of work performance for seafarers based on fuzzy Electre model,"J. Shipp. Trade, vol. 6, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41072-021-00088-0
  11. M. Yorulmaz, "The Effect of Organizational Attitudes and Behaviors on Job Performance in Maritime Transportation Sector Employees,"J. E. T. A. Marit. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 79–96, 2019
  12. TO Naevestad, "Safety culture in maritime transport in Norway and Greece: Exploring national, sectorial and organizational influences on unsafe behavior and work accidents,"March Policy, vol. 99, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.001
  13. D. Andrei, MR Grech, M. Griffin, and A. Neal, “ASSESSING THE DETERMINANTS OF SAFETY CULTURE IN THE MARITIME INDUSTRY,”Int. J. Marit. Eng., vol. 162, no. A4, 2021, doi: 10.5750/ijme.v162iA4.1143
  14. F. . Gunhan, “Measuring seafarers' work performance at sea,” Maritime Studies Department, Istanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2023
  15. Y. Ma, Q. Liu, L. Yang, and H. Meng, “Recognition of marine navigators' workload based on eye movement features using bridge simulation,”Saf. Sci., vol. 178, 2024, doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106607
  16. J. Szafran-Dobrowolska, M. Grubman-Nowak, M. Renke, and M. Jeżewska, "The psychosocial burden and stress coping strategies among seafarers,"Int. Marit. Health, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 122–128, 2023, doi: 10.5603/IMH.2023.0018
  17. EA Schmied, EM Harrison, RG Dell'Acqua, VG Perez, G. Glickman, and SL Hurtado, “A Qualitative Examination of Factors That Influence Sleep Among Shipboard Sailors,”Mil. Med., vol. 186, no. 1–2, pp. E160–E168, 2021, doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa321
  18. SA Chabal, RR Markwald, and ED Chinoy, “Life onboard a submarine: Sleep, fatigue, and lifestyle behaviors of sailors on a circadian-aligned watchstanding schedule,”Appl. Ergon., vol. 119, no. March, p. 104321, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104321
  19. T. Nævestad, “Safety culture among private and professional drivers in Norway and Greece: Examining the influence of national road safety culture,”Safety, vol. 5, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/safety5020020
  20. R. Flin, K. Mearns, P. O'Connor, and R. Bryden, “Measuring safety climate: Identifying the common features,”Saf. Sci., vol. 34, no. 1–3, pp. 177–192, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6
  21. N. Pidgeon, “Risk assessment, risk values and the social science program: Why we do need risk perception research,”Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2
  22. J. Reason,Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, 1st ed. London: Ashgate, 1997
  23. J. Fenstad, Ø. Dahl, and T. Kongsvik, “Shipboard safety: exploring organizational and regulatory factors,”Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 552–568, 2016, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1154993
  24. UC Arican and K. Koyuncu, “Employee loyalty and motivation in the maritime industry,” 2023, pp. 225–246
  25. F. Buscema, A. Grandi, and L. Colombo, “How can seafarers do it? Qualitative research in psychosocial risks of South Italy's seafarers,”Int. Marit. Health, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.5603/IMH.2023.0006
  26. PS Szwed and ME Manuel, “Proposing a Validation Tool for IMO Model Courses to Evaluate Alignment of Outcomes, Activities, and Assessment(Conference Paper),” inProceedings of the International Association of Maritime Universities Conference, International Association of Maritime Universities, 2022
  27. H. Rong, AP Teixeira, and CG Soares, “Ship collision avoidance behavior recognition and analysis based on AIS data,”Ocean Eng., vol. 245, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110479
  28. M. Yorulmaz and F. Sevinc Basol, “Yacht crews' perceptions of ethical climate, safety climate, psychological capital and psychological well-being in Türkiye,”Marit. Bus. Rev., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 113–127, 2024, doi: 10.1108/MABR-07-2023-0057

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.