skip to main content

Experimental Study on the Hydrodynamic Resistance of a 265 GT Fishing Vessel with Wind-Assisted Propulsion

*Anandita Fatihah  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jl. R.S Fatmawati Cilandak, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia 12450, Indonesia
Rina Rina  -  Research Center for Hydrodynamic Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jl. Hidro Dinamika, Keputih, Kec. Sukolilo Surabaya, East Java, 60117, Indonesia
Dian Purnama Sari  -  Research Center for Hydrodynamic Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jl. Hidro Dinamika, Keputih, Kec. Sukolilo Surabaya, East Java, 60117, Indonesia
Muhammad Ridwan Utina  -  Research Center for Hydrodynamic Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jl. Hidro Dinamika, Keputih, Kec. Sukolilo Surabaya, East Java, 60117, Indonesia
Wiwin Sulistyawati  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jl. R.S Fatmawati Cilandak, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia 12450, Indonesia
Received: 31 Jan 2026; Published: 13 Apr 2026.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study experimentally evaluates wind-assisted propulsion (WASP) to reduce the resistance of a 265 GT fishing vessel using model-scale towing tank test conducted at the PRTH-BRIN towing tank facility, with towing forces measured using calibrated resistance dynamometers following ITTC recommended procedures. Bare-hull resistance was measured at seven speeds over Froude numbers Fr = 0.12 – 0.30, while tests with the wing sail installed were conducted at three speeds in the upper range (Fr = 0.18 – 0.30) under steady beam wind conditions corresponding to a full-scale true wind speed of 20 knots. Towing-force measurements were converted into total resistance and total resistance coefficients. The wing sail effect was quantified using the wind-assisted percentage (WA%), defined as the relative reduction in resistance compared with the bare-hull condition at the same speed. A Type B uncertainty analysis following ITTC Recommendations was performed for the bare-hull measurements. The results show that, for the tested wind-assisted condition, the wing sail configuration produced lower resistance than the bare-hull at the same speed. The absolute resistance reduction increases with Froude number, reaching about 1.06 N at the highest speed, whereas WA% decreased from about 4.53% to 2.25% indicating a larger relative benefit at lower end of the tested speed range. The expanded relative uncertainty of bare-hull resistance is below 4% for all operating points. Overall, the experiments indicate a measurable wind-assisted contribution from the wing sail and provide a practical framework for assessing WASP performance at model scale using WA% as an indicator.

Fulltext Email colleagues
Keywords: Fishing Vessel; Wing Sail; Wind-Assisted Ship Propulsion; Towing Tank Experiment; Resistance Characteristics; Wind-Assisted Percentage

Article Metrics:

  1. R. Irvana, K. Abdullah, A. S. Uyun, and O. Anne, ‘Transformation Conventional Fishing Vessels 30 GT to Hybrid (Diesel-PV) System to Reduce Fuel Oil Consumption and Exhaust Emissions’, BIO Web Conf., vol. 104, p. 00033, May 2024, doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202410400033
  2. K. Yeremenko, ‘International Maritime Organization and Decarbonization of Maritime Industry: Mandate and Instruments’, Lex Portus, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 30–57, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.26886/2524-101X.8.3.2022.2
  3. International Maritime Organization, ‘Fourth Greenhouse Gas Study’, 2020
  4. A. I. Sultoni, M. M. Ali, and Z. P. Aji, ‘Hybrid Propulsion System (PV / Gasoline) For Small Fishing Vessels’, Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.14710/kapal.v17i1.25613
  5. M. Kolodziejski and M. Sosnowski, ‘Review of Wind-Assisted Propulsion Systems in Maritime Transport’, Energies (Basel)., vol. 18, no. 4, p. 897, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18040897
  6. A. Buwono, M. Muslim, R. Irvana, S. Manullang, R. Dariansyah, and A. C. Partahi Oloan, ‘Initial Engineering Studies of Battery Capacity Prediction Power of “Electric Ship of FTK UNSADA” Container Concept from Jakarta to Ibu Kota Nusantara’, Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 112–126, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.14710/kapal.v21i2.64620
  7. V. Vigna and M. Figari, ‘Wind-Assisted Ship Propulsion Feasibility Study’, 2022. doi: 10.3233/PMST220003
  8. A. D. Maimon, ‘Wind propulsion of ships to decarbonize maritime transport’, Analele Universităţii ‘Dunărea de Jos’ din Galaţi Fascicula XI Construcţii navale/ Annals of ‘Dunărea de Jos’ of Galati Fascicle XI Shipbuilding, vol. 46, pp. 55–60, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.35219/AnnUgalShipBuilding/2023.46.07
  9. L. Khan, J. J. R. Macklin, B. C. D. Peck, O. Morton, and J.-B. R. G. Souppez, ‘A Review of Wind-Assisted Ship Propulsion for Sustainable Commercial Shipping: Latest Developments and Future Stakes’, Wind Propulsion 2021, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3940/rina.win.2021.05
  10. F. Thies and J. W. Ringsberg, ‘Wind-assisted, electric, and pure wind propulsion – the path towards zero-emission RoRo ships’, Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1229–1236, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2022.2111923
  11. T. Chou, V. Kosmas, M. Acciaro, and K. Renken, ‘A Comeback of Wind Power in Shipping: An Economic and Operational Review on the Wind-Assisted Ship Propulsion Technology’, Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–16, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13041880
  12. T. Plessas and A. Papanikolaou, ‘Multi-Objective Optimization of Ship Design for the Effect of Wind Propulsion’, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 167, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/jmse13010167
  13. A. Yasuda, T. Taniguchi, and T. Katayama, ‘Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Interactions between Rigid Sails Attached to Ship’, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1425, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12081425
  14. C. Guzelbulut, T. Sugimoto, Y. Fujita, and K. Suzuki, ‘Investigation of the efficiency of wind-assisted systems using model-based design approach’, J. Mar. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 387–403, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00773-024-00993-6
  15. N. J. van der Kolk, J. A. Keuning, and R. H. M. Huijsmans, ‘Part 1: Experimental Validation of a RANS-CFD Methodology for the Hydrodynamics of Wind-Assisted Ships Operating at Leeway Angles’, Ocean Engineering, vol. 178, pp. 375–387, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.041
  16. T. Sauder and S. A. Alterskjær, ‘Hydrodynamic Testing of Wind-Assisted Cargo Ships Using a Cyber–Physical Method’, Ocean Engineering, vol. 243, p. 110206, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110206
  17. R. B. Luhulima, S. Sutiyo, and I. K. A. P. Utama, ‘CFD Analysis into the Resistance of Trimaran with Longitudinal Sidehull Adjustments’, Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 119–127, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.14710/kapal.v18i3.41010
  18. ITTC, ‘ITTC Recommended Procedure 7.5-02-02-01: Resistance Test (Rev. 05)’, 2021
  19. P. Dian, M. R. Utina, Rina, S. Endah, and S. Nanang, ‘Model Experiment on Fishing Vessel Operation in Benoa, Bali, Using Wind-Assisted Propulsion System’, Surabaya, 2025
  20. K. Wrzask, ‘On the Vessel Energy Requirement Prediction From the Acceleration Stage Towing Experiments on Models’, Apr. 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04200
  21. H. Wu, S. Yang, C. Liu, and G. Xiang, ‘Design & Performance Analysis of Variable Cross-section Wing Sail Based on Discrete Deformation Structure’, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 59, no. 22, pp. 764–769, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.11.727
  22. A. Amiadji, A. Baidowi, I. S. Arief, and F. P. Ricinzky, ‘CFD Based Analysis of Resistance and Pitch Motion of Novel Flat Plate Panel Hull Vessel’, Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 9–22, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.14710/kapal.v19i1.43370
  23. İ. Şahin and A. Acir, ‘Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Lift and Drag Performances of NACA 0015 Wind Turbine Airfoil’, International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22–25, 2015, doi: 10.7763/IJMMM.2015.V3.159
  24. A. Winarno, G. A. N. S. Sakti, and E. Sugianto, ‘The Effect of Tip Clearance Kaplan Ducted Propeller in Offshore Supply Vessel (OSV) on Hydrodynamics’, Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 156–170, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.14710/kapal.v21i3.64772
  25. ITTC, ‘ITTC Recommended Procedure 7.5-02-01-03: General Density and Viscosity of Water (Rev. 01)’, 2006
  26. N. T. H. Trang, T. Mitsuyuki, Y. Hirakawa, K. Sadakata, and Y. Nakamura, ‘Experimental and Numerical Study on the Seakeeping Performance of a Wind-Powered Generation Ship Considering Boom Configurations’, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 412, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/jmse13030412
  27. I. Sofiati, E. Yulihastin, Suaydhi, and M. F. Putranto, ‘Meridional Variations of Sea Surface Temperature and Wind Over Southern Sea of Java and its Surroundings’, Journal of Physics and Its Applications, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 129–135, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpa.v3i1.9374
  28. R. Eggers and A. S. Kisjes, ‘Seakeeping and Manoeuvring for Wind Assisted Ships’, Wind Propulsion 2019, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3940/rina.win.2019.09
  29. ITTC, ‘ITTC Recommended Procedure 7.5-02-02-02: General Guideline for Uncertainty Analysis in Resistance Tests (Rev.03)’, 2021
  30. I. K. A. P. Utama, D. Purnamasari, I. K. Suastika, Nurhadi, and G. A. Thomas, ‘Toward Improvement of Resistance Testing Reliability’, Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 53, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2021.53.2.1
  31. S. Oyuela, H. R. D. Ojeda, F. P. Arribas, A. D. Otero, and R. Sosa, ‘Investigating Fishing Vessel Hydrodynamics by Using EFD and CFD Tools, with Focus on Total Ship Resistance and Its Components’, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 622, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12040622
  32. S. Hosseinzadeh, D. Hudson, S. R. Turnock, M. Prince, and J. Banks, ‘Influence of Hull–Propeller–Rudder Interaction on the Self-Propulsion of Wind-Assisted Ships’, Physics of Fluids, vol. 37, no. 8, p. 087216, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0281083

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-04-13 10:38:00

No citation recorded.