skip to main content

Memori Kerja dan Kesalahan Penggunaan Partikel Kakujoshi oleh Calon Guru Bahasa Jepang

Rike Febriyanti  -  Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang, Indonesia
*Lailatul Husna  -  Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 by authors under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Particles in Japanese have a vital position and are very difficult for Indonesian Japanese learners. In
addition to appearing very often, they also mark verbal arguments, mark additions and have semantic
attributes, topical phrases and mark additional attributive nominals which when studied are recorded
in the working memory of our brains. This study attempts to see the error in particle selection in the
working memory thinking framework carried out by students who will become prospective Japanese
language teachers. This study uses a qualitative and quantitative method of analysing the results of
respondents' work. We can conclude that these prospective teachers have not received enough
systematic time and opportunity to be able to place various Japanese language particles in their
working memory so that they can use the right particles whenever they are faced with the opportunity
to use the particles.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: working memory; Japanese language particle; kakujoshi

Article Metrics:

  1. Alifah, R. F. (2024). Semantic of Case Particles Ni, De, E, and O as Locative Marker. Humanika, 30(2), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v30i2.59714
  2. Amalia, A. (2013). Analisis Kesalahan Partikel Mahasiswa Program Studi Sastra Jepang Universitas Nasional PASIM. 4(1)
  3. Boye, K. (2023). Grammaticalization as Conventionalization of Discursively Secondary Status: Deconstructing the Lexical–Grammatical Continuum. Transactions of the Philological Society, 121, 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12265
  4. Chai, W. J., Abd Hamid, A. I., & Abdullah, J. M. (2018). Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(MAR), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401
  5. Corder, S. P. (1967). The Significance of Learner's Errors. IRAL : International Review of Applied. Linguistics in Language Teaching, 161-170
  6. Das, D., & Taboada, M. (2018). Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse, Beyond Discourse Markers. Discourse Processes, 55(8), 743–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1379327
  7. Fafrowicz, M., Ceglarek, A., Olszewska, J., Sobczak, A., Bohaterewicz, B., Ostrogorska, M., Reuter-Lorenz, P., Lewandowska, K., Sikora-Wachowicz, B., Oginska, H., HubalewskaMazgaj, M., & Marek, T. (2023). Dynamics of working memory process revealed by independent component analysis in an fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29869-2
  8. Febriyanti, R. (2014). An Analysis and Classification of Errors Written by Indonesian Native Speaker in Japanese Language Essays [Thesis]. Universitas Brawijaya
  9. Fougeron, C., Guitard-Ivent, F., & Delvaux, V. (2021). Multi-dimensional variation in adult speech as a function of age. Languages, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040176
  10. Hublet, F. (2022). IDL-PMCFG, a Grammar Formalism for Describing Free Word Order Languages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 31(3), 327–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-022-09363-0
  11. Kasai, C., Sumiya, M., Koike, T., Yoshimoto, T., Maki, H., & Sadato, N. (2022). Neural underpinning of Japanese particle processing in non-native speakers. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23382-8
  12. Li, M. (2023). The Subjectivity of the Verb “至于.” SHS Web of Conferences, 168, 02024. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316802024
  13. Li, S. (2022). Working Memory and Second Language Learning. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Psycholinguistics, November, 348–360. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018872-32
  14. Nobre, A. C. (2022). Opening Questions in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 35(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01920
  15. Okamoto, S., & Morimoto, M. (2023). Gender norms and styling in Japanese conversation: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12569
  16. Rini, E. I. H. A. N., & Aini, T. N. I. (2023). Analisis kontrastif partikel bahasa Jepang dan bahasa Jawa. Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan, 7(1), 180–188
  17. Rustandi, A., Febriani, R. B., Asistido, M. T., & Syafryadin, S. (2023). Interlanguage syntactic temporary, permanent, and fossilized errors in second language writing. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 13(1), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v13i1.6090
  18. Safama, S. A., Diner, L., & Semarang, U. N. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Penggunaan Partikel Wa, No , Ni , De pada Siswa MAN 1 Kebumen. 6(1), 44–54
  19. Siegel, M. (1998). Japanese Particles in an HPSG Grammar. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes
  20. Tomioka, S. (2016). Information structure in Japanese. The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, September, 753–773
  21. Wen, Z. E., & Li, S. (2019). Working memory in l2 learning and processing. The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, September, 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.016
  22. Widodo, P., Sari, R., Yogyakarta, U. N., Malang, K., & Tunggal, C. (2021). PRAGMATIC ROLE OF SPEECH ACT COMMUNICATION AMONG NON-ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS Pratomo Widodo 1* , Retma Sari 2 1, 2. 6(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijel.v6i2.728

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-01-30 04:30:34

No citation recorded.