skip to main content

Analisis Kesalahan Penggunaan Jouken Hyougen pada Pembelajar Bahasa Jepang

*Kusnaryati Fridasari  -  Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Dedi Sutedi  -  Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Herniwati Herniwati  -  Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 by authors under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to analyze errors in the use of jouken hyougen among learners of the Japanese language. It focuses on identifying the common types of errors and describing the factors that cause these errors. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The participants consist of 21 students from Widyatama University, who have studied Japanese for at least two years. Data were collected through written tests, multiple choice questions, true-false questions, and questionnaires. The result of the data analysis reveal that the most frequent errors occured in the use of the tara form, followed by errors in the to and ba forms. Many learners experience difficulties in understanding the appropriate context for each sentence structure, requiring more time to study jouken hyougen, experiencing confusion in distinguishing the different forms, and make mistakes in applying the gramatical rules. The percentage of errors recorded was 52.37% for the to form, 47.61% for the ba form, 76.19% for the tara form, and 33.32% for the nara form. The factors contributing to these errors include learners lack of understanding of the proper function and use of each form in sentences, the influence of interference of their mother tongue, insufficient practice in writing and speaking with jouken hyougen in real life situations, and social factors.  

 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
CTAP Artikel
Subject
Type Other
  Download (128KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Errors, Jouken Hyougen, Japanese Language.

Article Metrics:

  1. Akatsuka, N. (2018). Subjectivity in Conditional Expressions: A Study of Ba in Japanese. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press. Vol. 9. https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1983-1- 202
  2. Brown, D. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 2nd edn, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
  3. Chaer, A. (2009). Sintaksis Bahasa Indonesia (Pendekatan Proses). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  4. Corder, S.P. (1974). Error Analysis. London : Oxford University Press
  5. Febriyanti, R. & Husna, L. (2024). Memori kerja dan Kesalahan Penggunaan Partikel Kakujoshi oleh Calon Guru Bahasa Jepang. Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan, 8(2), 643-644. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v8i2.642-662
  6. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco; John Wiley & Sons
  7. Hasunuma, A. (2010). Jouken Hyougen. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan
  8. Ichikawa, Y. (2005). Shokyu Nihongo Bunpou to Oshiekata no Pointo (Point of Basic Japanese Grammar and Teaching). Tokyo: 3A Corporation
  9. Iori, I. (2000). Shokyuu o Oshieru Hito no Tame no Nihongo Bunpou Handobukku. Tokyo: 3A Corporation
  10. Sania. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Penggunaan Jouken Hyougen Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang Angkatan 2020 Universitas Negeri Padang. (Skripsi). Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang
  11. Sutedi, D. & Widodo, G. A. P. (2020). Kesalahan Penggunaan Jouken Hyougen pada Pembelajar Bahasa Jepang Level Menengah Atas. J-Litera: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya Jepang. 2(2), ichikiori 57-59. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jlitera.2020.2.2.2593
  12. Sutedi, D. & Widianti, S. (2016). Kalimat Pengandaian dalam Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Sintaksis dan Semantis. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra. 16(1), 23-24. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v16i1.3059
  13. Sutedi, D. Hayati, N. Widianti, S. (2024). A Contrastive Analysis of Indirect Passive Sentences of Japanese Language and Sundanese Passive Sentences. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(3). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6662
  14. Sutedi, D. (2020). The Semantic roles of kaku-joshi in Japanese textbooks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 9(3). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23204
  15. Sutedi, D. Juangsih, J, Rasiban, L. (2024). Japanese Idiom Learning through Cognitive Linguistics Concept (Idioms Presentation). Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics. 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v8i1.20394
  16. Tarigan, H.G. dan D. Tarigan. (2011). Pengajaran Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa
  17. Tsujimura, N. (2013). An Introduction to Japanese linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. Takubo, Y. (2020). 9 Conditionals in Japanese. Fukuoka: Fukuoka University Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-03-31 18:53:08

No citation recorded.