Kausatif-Pasif Morfologis Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Tipologi Bahasa

Haqi Sang Kautsar; Agus Subiyanto

doi:10.14710/kiryoku.v9i2.511-521

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v9i2.511-521

Kausatif-Pasif Morfologis Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Tipologi Bahasa

Haqi Sang Kautsar , Agus Subiyanto

Magister Ilmu Linguistik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{KIRYOKU73516,
    author = {Haqi Kautsar and Agus Subiyanto},
    title = {Kausatif-Pasif Morfologis Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Tipologi Bahasa},
    journal = {KIRYOKU},
  volume = {9},
    number = {2},
    year = {2025},
    keywords = {Indonesian; Japanese; causative; passive},
    abstract = {  This study aims to describe the causative-passive morphological construction of Indonesian and Japanese and its unique features and constraints. This study offers a contribution in the form of an examination of a feature that is not found in all languages that have causative and passive markers. The data collection method used in this study is the observation method. Data on morphological causative-passive constructions were obtained from the LCC Indonesian 2023 corpus and the Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Japanese. The acceptability of causative-passive constructions in Indonesian was tested by the author as a native speaker of Indonesian and with 2 native speakers in Japanese. This study presents new findings, namely the expansion of Siewieska's (2013) passive criteria, the tendency of Indonesian and Japanese morphological causative-passive patterns along with the uniqueness and constraints of their construction. Based on the analysis results, the formation of morphological causative-passive in Indonesian is through the base form of intransitive verbs (36.99%), nouns (32.05%), adjectives (26.48%), adverbs (4,18%) with transitive verbs are unproductive. Meanwhile, in Japanese the formation is through the base form of nouns (77,76%), transitive verbs (17,97%), onomatopoeia (2,83%), and intransitive verbs (1,44%). Indonesian and Japanese have unique features that the morphological causative construction of transitive verbs can be passivized. The constraints on causative-passive morphological construction in Indonesian lie in emotional verbs. Meanwhile, in Japanese, constraints also occur in emotional verbs and in the suffix -gar-u which can be formed into causative but cannot be passivized.   },
   issn = {2581-0960},   pages = {511--521}  doi = {10.14710/kiryoku.v9i2.511-521},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/article/view/73516}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

This study aims to describe the causative-passive morphological construction of Indonesian and Japanese and its unique features and constraints. This study offers a contribution in the form of an examination of a feature that is not found in all languages that have causative and passive markers. The data collection method used in this study is the observation method. Data on morphological causative-passive constructions were obtained from the LCC Indonesian 2023 corpus and the Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Japanese. The acceptability of causative-passive constructions in Indonesian was tested by the author as a native speaker of Indonesian and with 2 native speakers in Japanese. This study presents new findings, namely the expansion of Siewieska's (2013) passive criteria, the tendency of Indonesian and Japanese morphological causative-passive patterns along with the uniqueness and constraints of their construction. Based on the analysis results, the formation of morphological causative-passive in Indonesian is through the base form of intransitive verbs (36.99%), nouns (32.05%), adjectives (26.48%), adverbs (4,18%) with transitive verbs are unproductive. Meanwhile, in Japanese the formation is through the base form of nouns (77,76%), transitive verbs (17,97%), onomatopoeia (2,83%), and intransitive verbs (1,44%). Indonesian and Japanese have unique features that the morphological causative construction of transitive verbs can be passivized. The constraints on causative-passive morphological construction in Indonesian lie in emotional verbs. Meanwhile, in Japanese, constraints also occur in emotional verbs and in the suffix -gar-u which can be formed into causative but cannot be passivized.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download | common.other

CTAP Form of Kiryoku

Subject
Type	Other
	Download (177KB) Indexing metadata

Keywords: Indonesian; Japanese; causative; passive

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan (In progress)

Recent articles

Evolusi Pengaruh Budaya Jepang dalam Desain dan Gaya Berpakaian di Indonesia: Kajian Sistematis Proses Individuasi Diri Tokoh Otosaka Yuu Dalam Anime “Charlotte”: Psikoanalisis Carl Gustav Jung Pagelaran Budaya di Sakura Matsuri Sebagai Strategi Diplomasi Untuk Mengundang Masyarakat Indonesia Mengunjungi Jepang More recent articles

Most cited articles

Verba Kompon Hajimeru, Dasu, Dan Kakeru Sebagai Penanda Aspek Inkoatif Bahasa Jepang More cited articles

Deeters, G. (1930). Das kharthwelische Verbum. Makert & Petters
Dixon, R. M. W., Aikhenvald, A. Y., Mithun, M., Onishi, M., Rice, K., Campbell, L., LaPolla, R. J., Amberer, M., Reid, N., Comrie, B., & Martin, J. B. (2000). Changing Valency: Case Study in Transitivity (R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald, Eds.). Cambridge University Press
Erdal, M. (1996). On Applying “Causative” to “Passive”, Mainly in Turkish. Transactions of the Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 6, 77–95
Harahap, N. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif (H. Sazali, Ed.). Wal ashri Publishing
Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb — combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har
Irwin, M., & Zisk, M. (2019). Japanese Linguistics . Asakura Shoten
Khaer, U. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menggunakan Kalimat Kausatif-Pasif Bahasa Jepang (Shieki-Ukemi Bun). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Maekawa, K., Yamazaki, M., Ogiso, T., Maruyama, T., Ogura, H., Kashino, W., Koiso, H., Yamaguchi, M., Tanaka, M., & Den, Y. (2014). Balanced corpus of contemporary written Japanese. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48(2), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-013-9261-0
Mcpherson, L., & Paster, M. (2009). Evidence for the Mirror Principle and Morphological Templates in Luganda Affix Ordering. In A. Ojo & L. Moshi (Eds.), 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: Linguistic Research and Languages in Africa (pp. 56–66). Cascadilla Proceedings Project
Mulyadi. (2004). Konstruksi Kausatif dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Linguistika, 11(21), 133–145
Mustika, N. (2017). Kalimat Pasif dalam Bahasa Inggris dan Bahasa Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Kontrastif. Jurnal Kata: Penelitian Tentang Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.22216/jk.v1i2.1861
Natsuko, T. (2014). An introduction to Japanese linguistics (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1997.0023
Nurjaleka, L. (2013). Perbandingan Struktur Kalimat Pasif Berverba Jidoshi dan Kalimat Kausatif Pasif dalam Bahasa Jepang. Chi’e: Journal of Japanese Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/chie.v2i1.2448
Rosliana, L. (2019). Sufiks Pembentuk Verba Transitif Dan Intransitif Dalam Bahasa Jepang. KIRYOKU, 3(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v3i1.17-27
Saidi, M. S. (2016). Fungsi Pelaku dalam Kalimat Pasif Bahasa Indonesia. Paramasastra: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v3n2.p%25p
Siewieska, A. (2013). Passive Constructions. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Zenodo
Sukma, L. P. R., & Setiawan, L. G. I. P. S. (2020). Kontrastivitas Diatesis Pasif Bahasa Indoensia dan Bahasa Jepang dalam Dongeng Jepang Momotaro. KULTURISTIK: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Budaya, 4(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.22225/kulturistik.4.2.1903
Winarti. (2009). Konstruksi Kausatif Morfologis dan Perifratis dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia
Yeon, J.-H. (1991). The Korean Causative-Passive Correlation Revisited. Language Research, 27, 337–358
Yogyanti, D. W. (2022). Implikasi Diatesis Pada Struktur Sintaksis Bahasa Jepang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 6(3), 10412–10423. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i3.3434

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-08-09 21:53:55

No citation recorded.

Copyright Notice

Starting from 2017, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
has never been published before,
does not contain statements that violate the law, and
does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), is free from the rights of third parties, and the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article in any repository, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal (Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan).

Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.

Notes for Usage of Generative AI in Scientific Writing

The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process:

Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies should only be used in the writing process to improve the readability and language of the manuscript.
The technology must be applied with human oversight and control and authors should carefully review and edit the result, as AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete or biased.
Authors are ultimately responsible and accountable for the contents of the work.
Authors must not list or cite AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author on the manuscript since authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans.
The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing must be declared by adding a statement at the end of the manuscript when the paper is first submitted.
We do not permit the use of Generative AI or AI-assisted tools to create or alter images in submitted manuscripts.
The use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools in the production of artwork such as for graphical abstracts is not permitted. The use of generative AI in the production of cover art may in some cases be allowed, if the author obtains prior permission from the journal editor and publisher, can demonstrate that all necessary rights have been cleared for the use of the relevant material, and ensures that there is correct content attribution.