Kajian Intertekstual pada Novel Jepun Negerinya Hiroko dengan Kuantar Ke Gerbang

Jourike Runtuwarouw; Mochamad Arief Komarudin

doi:10.14710/kiryoku.v10i1.225-234

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v10i1.225-234

Kajian Intertekstual pada Novel Jepun Negerinya Hiroko dengan Kuantar Ke Gerbang

Jourike Runtuwarouw , Mochamad Arief Komarudin

Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{KIRYOKU78966,
    author = {Jourike Runtuwarouw and Mochamad Arief Komarudin},
    title = {Kajian Intertekstual pada Novel Jepun Negerinya Hiroko dengan Kuantar Ke Gerbang},
    journal = {KIRYOKU},
  volume = {10},
    number = {1},
    year = {2026},
    keywords = {inter-textual study; novel study; comparative literature},
    abstract = {  This study aims to describe the intertextual relationship between the novels Jepun Negerinya Hiroko and Kuantar ke Gerbang, including comparisons of the main male characters, themes, plots, meanings, and points of view in both novels. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method with an intertextual approach. Data were collected through library techniques and validated using theoretical and data triangulation. Analysis results reveal that both novels share similarities and differences in their structural elements. The similarities include the selfish attitude of the main male characters, themes addressing social problems encompassing human life in macro and micro aspects that influence marital relationships, point of view using first-person singular style where in Jepun Negerinya Hiroko the narrator participates as a character in the story, while in Kuantar ke Gerbang the narrator exists outside the story but understands the characters' feelings, and an overall meaning of unity among people. In Jepun Negerinya Hiroko, universalism is emphasized to unite different ethnic groups through the slogan promoting freedom, brotherhood, and equality, whereas Kuantar ke Gerbang highlights nationalism through youth unity. The differences between the two novels include the main male character being introverted in Jepun Negerinya Hiroko and extroverted in Kuantar ke Gerbang, the role of the main male character as antagonist versus protagonist, the central theme concerning mixed marriage between different cultural and national backgrounds compared to the spirit of national independence struggle, and the use of flashback plot positioned at the end of the story in Jepun Negerinya Hiroko.   },
   issn = {2581-0960},   pages = {225--234}  doi = {10.14710/kiryoku.v10i1.225-234},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/article/view/78966}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

This study aims to describe the intertextual relationship between the novels Jepun Negerinya Hiroko and Kuantar ke Gerbang, including comparisons of the main male characters, themes, plots, meanings, and points of view in both novels. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method with an intertextual approach. Data were collected through library techniques and validated using theoretical and data triangulation. Analysis results reveal that both novels share similarities and differences in their structural elements. The similarities include the selfish attitude of the main male characters, themes addressing social problems encompassing human life in macro and micro aspects that influence marital relationships, point of view using first-person singular style where in Jepun Negerinya Hiroko the narrator participates as a character in the story, while in Kuantar ke Gerbang the narrator exists outside the story but understands the characters' feelings, and an overall meaning of unity among people. In Jepun Negerinya Hiroko, universalism is emphasized to unite different ethnic groups through the slogan promoting freedom, brotherhood, and equality, whereas Kuantar ke Gerbang highlights nationalism through youth unity. The differences between the two novels include the main male character being introverted in Jepun Negerinya Hiroko and extroverted in Kuantar ke Gerbang, the role of the main male character as antagonist versus protagonist, the central theme concerning mixed marriage between different cultural and national backgrounds compared to the spirit of national independence struggle, and the use of flashback plot positioned at the end of the story in Jepun Negerinya Hiroko.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: inter-textual study; novel study; comparative literature

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan (On Progress)

Recent articles

Kajian Intertekstual pada Novel Jepun Negerinya Hiroko dengan Kuantar Ke Gerbang Needs Tokoh Izumi Kudo Dalam Film Narratage: Teori Personologi Henry Murray Dinamika Kepribadian Tokoh Eikichi Onizuka dalam Drama Great Teacher Onizuka (2012): Psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud More recent articles

Most cited articles

Verba Kompon Hajimeru, Dasu, Dan Kakeru Sebagai Penanda Aspek Inkoatif Bahasa Jepang More cited articles

Abbott, H. P. (2020). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Badudu, J. S., & Zein, S. M. (1994). Kamus umum bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
Dini, Nh. (2000). Jepun Negerinya Hiroko. Jakarta: Gramedia Pusaka
Endraswara, S. (2016). Metodologi penelitian sastra: Epistemologi, model, teori, dan aplikasi (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service)
Faruk. (2017). Metode penelitian sastra: Sebuah penjelajahan awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Herman, D. (2019). Basic elements of narrative. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://scispace.com/pdf/basic-elements-of-narrative-20tcb2kjzl.pdf
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2018). Teori pengkajian fiksi (Cetakan ke-11). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
Ramadhan, K.H. (1988). Kuantar ke Gerbang. Kisah Cinta Ibu Inggit dengan Bung Karno. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Ratna, N. K. (2015). Teori, metode, dan teknik penelitian sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Sugihastuti & Suharto. (2016). Kritik sastra feminis: Teori dan aplikasinya (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Torevell, D. (2019). Withstanding the Goading of Temptation or Not? An inter-textual Study of Pride and Envy in Genesis Chapter 3: 1-19 and Shakespeare’s Othello. International Journal of Social Science Studies. DOI: 10.11114/ijsss.v7i6.4537
Tsakona, V., & Chovanec, J. (2020). Revisiting intertextuality and humour: fresh perspectives on a classic topic. The European Journal of Humour Research, 8(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.3.Tsakona
Wibawa, G. M., Rasiban, L. M., & Bachri, A. S. (2025). Penggunaan Sufiks Hi, Ryou, dan Kin yang Bermakna ‘Biaya’ dalam Asahi & Yomiuri Shibun: Kajian Morfosemantik. KIRYOKU, 8, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v1i1.51-62
Wijayanty, M. T. (2020). Kajian Intertekstual Antara Novel Dilan 1991 Karya Pidi Baiq dengan Novel Delusi Karya Sirhayani. Parataksis: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.31851/parataksis.v3i2.4767
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-02-04 15:32:39

No citation recorded.

Copyright Notice

Starting from 2025, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
has never been published before,
does not contain statements that violate the law, and
does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held by the author(s), is free from the rights of third parties, and the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article in any repository, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal (Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan).

Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.

Notes for Usage of Generative AI in Scientific Writing

The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process:

Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies should only be used in the writing process to improve the readability and language of the manuscript.
The technology must be applied with human oversight and control and authors should carefully review and edit the result, as AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete or biased.
Authors are ultimately responsible and accountable for the contents of the work.
Authors must not list or cite AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author on the manuscript since authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans.
The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing must be declared by adding a statement at the end of the manuscript when the paper is first submitted.
We do not permit the use of Generative AI or AI-assisted tools to create or alter images in submitted manuscripts.
The use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools in the production of artwork such as for graphical abstracts is not permitted. The use of generative AI in the production of cover art may in some cases be allowed, if the author obtains prior permission from the journal editor and publisher, can demonstrate that all necessary rights have been cleared for the use of the relevant material, and ensures that there is correct content attribution.