skip to main content

Pengaruh Paradigma Pendidikan terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Jepang: Suatu Tinjauan Filosofis

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by authors under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to analyse how educational paradigms influence Japanese language learning. Recent studies in Japanese language education indicate a shift from structural approaches toward communicative, contextual, and learner-centered learning. In Indonesia, empirical studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of specific learning media in improving Japanese language outcomes, such as vocabulary mastery. However, most existing research focuses on instructional techniques or media effectiveness, with limited attention to the educational paradigms underlying teachers’ pedagogical decisions. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through an objective questionnaire administered to ten Japanese language teachers. The data were analyzed by mapping teachers’ responses to five educational paradigms: behavioristic, cognitivistic, constructivistic, humanistic, and sociocultural. The findings reveal that teachers conceptually favor communicative and constructivistic paradigms, particularly in defining learning goals and success indicators. Nevertheless, instructional practices and assessment methods remain largely influenced by cognitivistic and behavioristic paradigms. This discrepancy suggests that paradigm transformation in Japanese language education remains partial and transitional. This study contributes to Japanese language pedagogy by positioning educational paradigms as a philosophical framework connecting learning objectives, classroom practices, assessment, and learning outcomes.

Keywords: educational paradigm; Japanese language education; learning; philosophy of education

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2009). Paradigma ilmu sosial-budaya: Sebuah pandangan. Kuliah Umum Paradigma Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora, Program Studi Linguistik, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  2. Al Husaeni, D. N., & Haristiani, N. (2024). Bibliometric mapping of global research trends on technology integration in Japanese language education. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(1), 1–14. https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajert
  3. Aror, S. C., Sambe, N., & Harahap, P. B. P. (2025). Japanese language development for Tokutei Ginou candidates through the GROW-ME coaching model. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 6(6), 712–725. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v6i6.1127
  4. Biesta, G. (2008). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
  5. Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
  6. Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson Education
  7. Diner, L., Supriatnaningsih, R., & Nurjaleka, Y. (2025). Cultural understanding level of internship studenths Japanese language learners. IJSL: International Journal of Social Learning, 6(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v6i1.489
  8. Gunawan, A. R., Resky, M., & Latifah, H. (2024). Komparasi model pendidikan di Finlandia, Jepang dan Indonesia (Kajian paradigma Paulo Freire sebagai pendekatan). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Lampung 2024, 75–88
  9. International Encyclopedia of Education. (2023). Qualitative research. Dalam International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11004-8
  10. Karyati, A. (2024). Pemanfaatan website pembelajaran bahasa Jepang dalam meningkatkan kemandirian belajar siswa. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(1), 75–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/aksara.10.1.75-90.2024
  11. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press
  12. Niken, A., Sutama, I. M., & Dewantara, M. (2024). Pengembangan pembelajaran inovatif bahasa Jepang dengan media interaktif. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 1520–1531. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i2.7704
  13. Puspitasari, L., Amri, M., & Sodiq, S. (2021). The problems of performance assessment of Japanese language subjects based on e-learning using e-lingo platform. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2021), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.026
  14. Putri, T. H., Basri, M. S., & Budiani, D. (2023). Pengaruh media pembelajaran Quizlet terhadap penguasaan kosakata bahasa Jepang siswa kelas XI SMAN 8 Pekanbaru. Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan, 7(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v7i1.117-125
  15. Prawanti, A. A., Kumala, I., Fadillah, M. N., Damanik, R. Y. S., & Lubis, R. N. (2025). Desain, jenis, dan metode dalam penelitian kualitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 4(1), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.64464/tarbiyah.v4i1.186
  16. Qasserras, L. (2023). Systematic review of Communicative Language Teaching in language education. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.307
  17. Qualitative research in educational research. (2017). Qualitative research addresses “how” and “why” questions and enables deep understanding of experiences, phenomena, and context. PubMed Central. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5465434/
  18. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
  19. Rurisman, Ananda, A., Gistituati, N., Rusdinal, & Yerizon. (2024). Studi komparatif sistem pendidikan Indonesia dan Jepang. Jurnal Education and Development, 12(1), 408–412. https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/5432
  20. Setiana, S. M. (2023). Analisis kebutuhan pembelajaran bahasa Jepang mahasiswa. JANARU SAJA: Jurnal Pengajaran dan Kajian Kebahasaan Jepang, 2(2), 75–86. https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/janarusaja/article/view/11343/4053
  21. Takei, M., Fujiwara, M., & Shimojo, M. (2024). Japanese as a Lingua Franca: Exploring communication in educational contexts. IICE Proceedings, 45–58. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/iice2024/IICE2024_76743.pdf
  22. Vygotsky, L. S. (2018). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  23. Wulandari, T. (2024). Penelitian kualitatif adalah metode penelitian yang bertujuan memahami fenomena alami. Jurnal Literasikita Indonesia, 14(2), 110–122. https://jurnal.literasikitaindonesia.com/index.php/literasiologi/article/view/674

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-06-27 13:51:50

No citation recorded.