Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{KIRYOKU81102, author = {Feradita Utami}, title = {Pengaruh Paradigma Pendidikan terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Jepang: Suatu Tinjauan Filosofis}, journal = {KIRYOKU}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, year = {2026}, keywords = {educational paradigm; Japanese language education; learning; philosophy of education}, abstract = { This study aims to analyse how educational paradigms influence Japanese language learning. Recent studies in Japanese language education indicate a shift from structural approaches toward communicative, contextual, and learner-centered learning. In Indonesia, empirical studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of specific learning media in improving Japanese language outcomes, such as vocabulary mastery. However, most existing research focuses on instructional techniques or media effectiveness, with limited attention to the educational paradigms underlying teachers’ pedagogical decisions. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through an objective questionnaire administered to ten Japanese language teachers. The data were analyzed by mapping teachers’ responses to five educational paradigms: behavioristic, cognitivistic, constructivistic, humanistic, and sociocultural. The findings reveal that teachers conceptually favor communicative and constructivistic paradigms, particularly in defining learning goals and success indicators. Nevertheless, instructional practices and assessment methods remain largely influenced by cognitivistic and behavioristic paradigms. This discrepancy suggests that paradigm transformation in Japanese language education remains partial and transitional. This study contributes to Japanese language pedagogy by positioning educational paradigms as a philosophical framework connecting learning objectives, classroom practices, assessment, and learning outcomes . }, issn = {2581-0960}, pages = {490--504} doi = {10.14710/kiryoku.v10i2.490-504}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/article/view/81102} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This study aims to analyse how educational paradigms influence Japanese language learning. Recent studies in Japanese language education indicate a shift from structural approaches toward communicative, contextual, and learner-centered learning. In Indonesia, empirical studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of specific learning media in improving Japanese language outcomes, such as vocabulary mastery. However, most existing research focuses on instructional techniques or media effectiveness, with limited attention to the educational paradigms underlying teachers’ pedagogical decisions. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through an objective questionnaire administered to ten Japanese language teachers. The data were analyzed by mapping teachers’ responses to five educational paradigms: behavioristic, cognitivistic, constructivistic, humanistic, and sociocultural. The findings reveal that teachers conceptually favor communicative and constructivistic paradigms, particularly in defining learning goals and success indicators. Nevertheless, instructional practices and assessment methods remain largely influenced by cognitivistic and behavioristic paradigms. This discrepancy suggests that paradigm transformation in Japanese language education remains partial and transitional. This study contributes to Japanese language pedagogy by positioning educational paradigms as a philosophical framework connecting learning objectives, classroom practices, assessment, and learning outcomes.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-06-27 13:51:50
Copyright Notice
Starting from 2025, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as the following rights:
Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
Notes for Usage of Generative AI in Scientific Writing
The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.