1Hanoi University, Viet Nam
2Tokushima University, Japan
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{KIRYOKU85011, author = {Van Nghiem and Lan Anh Nguyen and Nam Tran}, title = {Beyond Memorization: Vocabulary Learning Difficulties and Instructional Support Needs among Vietnamese School Students Learning Japanese}, journal = {KIRYOKU}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, year = {2026}, keywords = {Japanese language education; vocabulary; kanji; Vietnamese learners; technology-supported learning}, abstract = { Research on Japanese-language learning has widely examined communication skills, motivation, and general vocabulary acquisition, yet limited evidence explains how Vietnamese school-level learners experience the interconnected difficulties of vocabulary form, sound, meaning, and contextual use. This study investigates these difficulties and identifies learners’ instructional and technological support needs. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted with 37 Vietnamese junior and senior high school students studying Japanese. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire covering learning background, vocabulary-learning habits, perceived difficulties, desired lesson content, preferred exercise types, and expectations for vocabulary-support tools. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical and multi-select items, and Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to examine associations between learner characteristics and the total number of reported difficulties. The most common challenges were remembering word meanings, distinguishing similar kanji forms, using words appropriately in context, and differentiating near-synonyms. Greater weekly study time and having a personal vocabulary-management system were associated with fewer reported difficulties. The study contributes novel exploratory evidence by integrating learners’ perceived vocabulary difficulties, study practices, and support expectations within a single school-level sample. The findings support instructional approaches that combine Vietnamese explanations, kanji support, contrastive examples, structured review, contextualized practice, and feedback. Theoretically, the study extends multidimensional models of vocabulary knowledge by showing that Japanese vocabulary difficulties among Vietnamese school students reflect an interconnected form–sound–meaning–use burden rather than isolated memorization problems. }, issn = {2581-0960}, pages = {548--562} doi = {10.14710/kiryoku.v10i2.548-562}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/article/view/85011} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Research on Japanese-language learning has widely examined communication skills, motivation, and general vocabulary acquisition, yet limited evidence explains how Vietnamese school-level learners experience the interconnected difficulties of vocabulary form, sound, meaning, and contextual use. This study investigates these difficulties and identifies learners’ instructional and technological support needs. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted with 37 Vietnamese junior and senior high school students studying Japanese. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire covering learning background, vocabulary-learning habits, perceived difficulties, desired lesson content, preferred exercise types, and expectations for vocabulary-support tools. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical and multi-select items, and Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to examine associations between learner characteristics and the total number of reported difficulties. The most common challenges were remembering word meanings, distinguishing similar kanji forms, using words appropriately in context, and differentiating near-synonyms. Greater weekly study time and having a personal vocabulary-management system were associated with fewer reported difficulties. The study contributes novel exploratory evidence by integrating learners’ perceived vocabulary difficulties, study practices, and support expectations within a single school-level sample. The findings support instructional approaches that combine Vietnamese explanations, kanji support, contrastive examples, structured review, contextualized practice, and feedback. Theoretically, the study extends multidimensional models of vocabulary knowledge by showing that Japanese vocabulary difficulties among Vietnamese school students reflect an interconnected form–sound–meaning–use burden rather than isolated memorization problems.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-08-14 13:13:02
Copyright Notice
Starting from 2025, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as the following rights:
Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
Notes for Usage of Generative AI in Scientific Writing
The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.