skip to main content

Semiotic Analysis of Roland Barthes in the Novel the Magic Library: Bibbi Bokken's Magic Library

Noor Arief orcid  -  Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Bekasi, Indonesia, Indonesia
*Bella Septi Maulidya orcid  -  Binus @Senayan Campus, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 20 Feb 2026; Revised: 22 Apr 2026; Accepted: 23 May 2026; Published: 30 Jun 2026.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Libraries and books are not merely physical repositories of information but cultural constructs that reflect how societies perceive, organize, and transmit knowledge. Literary works such as The Magic Library: Bibbi Bokken’s Magic Library offer a meaningful lens through which these cultural meanings can be examined, particularly in understanding libraries as symbolic spaces of knowledge and literacy.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze how meanings related to books, libraries, and knowledge are constructed through systems of signs in a literary text using Roland Barthes’ semiotic framework of denotation, connotation, and myth.

Methods: This study uses qualitative interpretative approach using Roland Barthes’ textual semiotic analysis method. The research demonstrates that the novel produces a myth in which knowledge gains meaning only through organization and accessibility.

Results: The study found The Magic Library: Bibbi Bokken’s Magic Library constructs meaning through librarianship-related symbols that represent knowledge, information order, and cultural continuity. Using Roland Barthes’ semiotic framework, the analysis shows that the library is portrayed not merely as a physical repository of books, but as a living epistemological space that emphasizes the importance of information organization, accessibility, and the sustained development of human knowledge within cultural and ideological contexts.

Conclusion: These results indicate that The Magic Library: Bibbi Bokken’s Magic Library portrays the library as more than a fantasy setting, presenting it as a symbol of knowledge, memory, and civilization. Through Barthes’ semiotic framework, the novel emphasizes the importance of systematic information management and the enduring role of libraries as living spaces that connect past, present, and future knowledge

Keywords: Semiotic; roland barthes; the magic library

Article Metrics:

  1. Ashikuzzaman, M. (2024, February 14). Library as a Cultural Organization: The Library’s Role in Community Identity. Library & Information Science Education Network. https://www.lisedunetwork.com/library-as-a-cultural-organization-the-librarys-role-in-community-identity/
  2. Barthes, Roland. (1967). Elements of semiologie. Hill and Wang
  3. Barthes, Roland., & Howard, Richard. (1988). The semiotic challenge. Hill and Wang
  4. Barthes, Roland., & Lavers, Annette. (1972). Mythologies. Hill and Wang
  5. Barus, E., Aisyah, A., Siregar, E. F., & Risnawaty, R. (2025). An analysis of Roland Barthes’ semiotic theory: focusing on denotation, connotation, and myth. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 4(2), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v4i2.1438
  6. Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge
  7. Cms, S., & Evi Nursanti Rukmana, dan. (n.d.). Menjaga memori, merawat budaya, menuju SDGs: peran transformasional perpustakaan di era modern. Menjaga Memori, Merawat Budaya, 7(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.61296/jkbh.v7i1.297
  8. Crawford, Alice., & Crawford, Robert. (2022). Libraries in literature. Oxford University Press
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications
  10. Hermansson, K. (2023). The magical library and the symbolic representation library representation in the librarian and the librarians. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1816512/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  11. Hidaya, A. S. (2020). Teori S.R. Ranganathan five laws of library science dalam pengembangan koleksi perpustakaan. FIHRIS: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/fhrs.2020.151.18-30
  12. Jadou, S. H., & Ghabra, I. M. M. M. Al. (2021). Barthes’ semiotic theory and interpretation of signs. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v11i03.027
  13. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174243
  14. Fahida, S. Y. N. (2021). Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes pada Film “nanti kita cerita hari ini” (NKCTHI) karya Angga Dwimas Sasongko. Journal Anthology of Film and Television Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/ftv-upi.v1i2.40622
  15. Palermos, S. O. (2022). Collaborative knowledge: where the distributed and commitment models merge. Synthese, 200(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03459-7
  16. Pezzini, I. (2017). Semiotics as a critical discourse: Roland Barthes’ Mythologies. Semiotics and Its Masters, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503825-017
  17. Shera, J. Hauk. (1972). The foundations of education for librarianship [by] Jesse H. Shera. Becker and Hayes
  18. Tancheva, K. (2005). Recasting the Debate: The Sign of the Library in Popular Culture. Libraries & Culture, 40(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1353/lac.2005.0079
  19. Tansilo, H. (2023). Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes dalam novel “Dilan 1990” karya Pidi Baiq. 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56335/jppn.v5i1.138
  20. Wibisono, P., & Sari, D. Y. (2021). Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes dalam semiotika Roland Barthes dalam film bintang ketjil karya Wim Umboh dan Misbach Yusa Bira. Jurnal Dinamika Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 30–43. http://journal.moestopo.ac.id/index.php/dinamika

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-01 15:13:23

No citation recorded.