BibTex Citation Data :
@article{NMJN53987, author = {Geraldine Ridad and Haniya Angintaopan and Princess Haniefa Mae Ayunan and Saipoden Manalocon}, title = {Stressors and Coping Strategies as Perceived among Nursing Students during Related Learning Experience (RLE)}, journal = {Nurse Media Journal of Nursing}, volume = {14}, number = {1}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Curriculum; nurses; nursing students; psychological adaptation}, abstract = { Background: Stress in relation to academic studies is identified to be one of the reasons behind suicide cases in higher education institutions around the world. Locally, there is none to less studies that explored this area among nursing students. As stress is inevitable in nursing students’ Related Learning Experience (RLE), recognizing the stressors that affect their quality of RLE is necessary. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the stressors and coping strategies that nursing students commonly use in managing stress during their RLE and their relationship to each other. Methods: A descriptive correlational research design with total enumeration sampling was employed. A pilot-tested questionnaire was used to gather data from 191 junior and senior nursing students from two nursing schools in Iligan City. Weighted mean, standard deviation, percentages, and Spearman rho were used to analyze the data. Results: The findings show that the \"Clinical Instructor\" (Mean=3.01) is perceived to cause higher stress among all the intrapersonal and interpersonal stressors identified. Students highly utilize both intrapersonal (Self-Concept Mean=3.75) and interpersonal strategies (Role Function Mean=4.13, Interdependence Mean=3.46) to cope with stress. When students’ clinical “skill confusion” increases, they tend to work less with others (r=-0.259, p =0.000). When “staff nurses” cause them less stress, their use of positive “self-concept” decreases as well (r=0.152, p =0.035). Furthermore, when students are stressed with their “Duty-mates,” they rely more on “physiological” coping mechanisms (r=0.160, p =0.027). When their “clinical instructor” causes them stress, they cope less with “physiological” (r=-0.237, p =0.001) and “interdependence” strategies (r=-0.317, p =0.000). Conclusion: Among all the stressors, clinical instructor causes more stress to the students. The students’ perceived stressors affect their effective use of intra and interpersonal coping strategies. Nurse educators, nursing schools and regulating bodies can consider these results in designing a holistic curriculum and helping students manage stress healthily. }, issn = {2406-8799}, pages = {1--15} doi = {10.14710/nmjn.v14i1.53987}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/53987} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Stress in relation to academic studies is identified to be one of the reasons behind suicide cases in higher education institutions around the world. Locally, there is none to less studies that explored this area among nursing students. As stress is inevitable in nursing students’ Related Learning Experience (RLE), recognizing the stressors that affect their quality of RLE is necessary.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the stressors and coping strategies that nursing students commonly use in managing stress during their RLE and their relationship to each other.
Methods: A descriptive correlational research design with total enumeration sampling was employed. A pilot-tested questionnaire was used to gather data from 191 junior and senior nursing students from two nursing schools in Iligan City. Weighted mean, standard deviation, percentages, and Spearman rho were used to analyze the data.
Results: The findings show that the "Clinical Instructor" (Mean=3.01) is perceived to cause higher stress among all the intrapersonal and interpersonal stressors identified. Students highly utilize both intrapersonal (Self-Concept Mean=3.75) and interpersonal strategies (Role Function Mean=4.13, Interdependence Mean=3.46) to cope with stress. When students’ clinical “skill confusion” increases, they tend to work less with others (r=-0.259, p=0.000). When “staff nurses” cause them less stress, their use of positive “self-concept” decreases as well (r=0.152, p=0.035). Furthermore, when students are stressed with their “Duty-mates,” they rely more on “physiological” coping mechanisms (r=0.160, p=0.027). When their “clinical instructor” causes them stress, they cope less with “physiological” (r=-0.237, p=0.001) and “interdependence” strategies (r=-0.317, p=0.000).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-05-17 05:49:19
In order for the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro to publish and disseminate research articles, we need non-exclusive publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro. This agreement involves the transfer or licensing of the copyright for publishing to the publisher, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. The Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro supports the need for authors to share, disseminate, and maximize the impact of their research through these rights in any databases.
As the author(s), you have rights to a wide range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institution or company. These author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing have extensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
Use for classroom teaching by the author or the author’s institution and presentation at a meeting or conference, including distributing copies to attendees;Use for internal training by the author’s company;Distribution to colleagues for their research use;Use in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works;Inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;Reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);Preparation of derivative works (other than for commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);Voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes
(following the open access license of the Creative Commons CC BY-SA License).
Authors, readers, and third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (including the name of the creator and attribution parties, detailed information about the authors, a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The publisher will indicate any modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications using a CrossMark Policy and information about Erratum-Corrigendum notifications.
Authors, readers, and third parties can read, print, and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g., display it in a repository), translate the article, download it for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or reuse it for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material. They must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
