BibTex Citation Data :
@article{MMH11424, author = {Sasmini Sasmini}, title = {JUSTIFIKASI DOKTRIN RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT (RtoP) DALAM BINGKAI ILMU HUKUM BERPARADIGMA PANCASILA}, journal = {Masalah-Masalah Hukum}, volume = {44}, number = {1}, year = {2015}, keywords = {Responsibility to Protect, Sovereignty, Jurisprudence, RtoP, Kedaulatan, Ilmu Hukum Berparadigma Pancasila}, abstract = { This article explores the nature of responsibility to protect (RtoP), whether it contends with state sovereignty and non intervention principles. This article also examines the RtoP justification based on jurisprudence with Pancasila paradigm that is Indonesia special jurisprudence grounded in Pancasila values. The emerging of this doctrine has re-interpreted state sovereignty and non intervention principles. The concept of state sovereignty is not absolute anymore. It further argues that the jurisprudence with Pancasila paradigm gives justification for RtoP because the purposes of this doctrine are to give virtue and substantive justice according to Pancasila values, especially inthe second principle that is justice and civilized humanity. Artikel ini mengeksplor hakikat doktrin responsibility to protect (RtoP), apakah doktrin ini bertentangan dengan prinsip kedaulatan negara dan non intervensi tidak. Artikel ini juga mengkaji justifikasi doktrin RtoP jika dilihat berdasarkan perspektif ilmu hukum berparadigma Pancasila, yaitu ilmu hukum khas Indonesia yang mendasarkan pada nilai-nilai Pancasila untuk memperoleh keadilan substansial. Kemunculan doktrin RtoP ini telah menginterpretasi ulang makna prinsip kedaulatan negara dan non intervensi. Prinsip kedaulatan negara bukan lagi sesuatu yang absolut. Ilmu hukum berparadigma Pancasila memberikan justifikasi pelaksanaan prinsip RtoP karena tujuannya untuk memberikan kebenaran dan keadilan dalam keridhoan Illahi berdasar nilai-nilai Pancasila, yaitu khususnya sila Kemanusiaan yang adil dan beradab. }, issn = {2527-4716}, pages = {59--68} doi = {10.14710/mmh.44.1.2015.59-68}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/11424} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This article explores the nature of responsibility to protect (RtoP), whether it contends with state sovereignty and non intervention principles. This article also examines the RtoP justification based on jurisprudence with Pancasila paradigm that is Indonesia special jurisprudence grounded in Pancasilavalues. The emerging of this doctrine has re-interpreted state sovereignty and non intervention principles. The concept of state sovereignty is not absolute anymore. It further argues that the jurisprudence with Pancasila paradigm gives justification for RtoP because the purposes of this doctrine are to givevirtue and substantive justice according to Pancasila values, especially inthe second principle that is justice and civilized humanity.
Artikel ini mengeksplor hakikat doktrin responsibility to protect (RtoP), apakah doktrin ini bertentangan dengan prinsip kedaulatan negara dan non intervensi tidak. Artikel ini juga mengkaji justifikasi doktrinRtoP jika dilihat berdasarkan perspektif ilmu hukum berparadigma Pancasila, yaitu ilmu hukum khas Indonesia yang mendasarkan pada nilai-nilai Pancasila untuk memperoleh keadilan substansial.Kemunculan doktrin RtoP ini telah menginterpretasi ulang makna prinsip kedaulatan negara dan non intervensi. Prinsip kedaulatan negara bukan lagi sesuatu yang absolut. Ilmu hukum berparadigma Pancasila memberikan justifikasi pelaksanaan prinsip RtoP karena tujuannya untuk memberikan kebenaran dan keadilan dalam keridhoan Illahi berdasar nilai-nilai Pancasila, yaitu khususnya sila Kemanusiaan yang adil dan beradab.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-07-05 11:14:30
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Masalah Masalah Hukum journal (MMH) and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
MMH journal and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
We strongly encourage that manuscripts be submitted to online journal system in http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/index. Authors are required to create an account and submit the manuscripts online. For submission inquiries, please follow the submission instructions in the website. If the author has any problems on the online submission, please contact Editorial Office at the following email: jurnal.mmh@undip.ac.id or jurnal.mmh@gmail.com
Contributors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce any materials, including photographs and illustrations, for which they do not hold the copyright and for ensuring that the appropriate acknowledgments are included in the manuscript.