1. Home
  2. Vol 53, No 3 (2024)
  3. Wiguna

MEMPERTIMBANGKAN ASPEK-ASPEK NON LEGAL FORMAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ADAT DI BALI

Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.53.3.2024.257-268
Copyright (c) 2024 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

The resolution of customary land disputes in Bali, based on formal justice in state court sessions, often ignores non-legal formal aspects that create injustice. This article puts forward a sociolegal approach to discuss the legal importance of considering formal and non-legal aspects in resolving customary land disputes in Bali. It describes the evaluative non-legal formal elements in question. The rationale for theoretically and juridically considering formal and non-legal aspects in resolving customary land disputes in Bali has found its place. Considering that in the current efforts to develop national law, it is important to prioritize a legal pluralism approach to realize substantive justice. Forms of non-legal formal aspects that should be considered are religious and socio-cultural aspects intertwined in customary land control in Bali.

Full Text: PDF

Keywords

Disputes; Customary Land; Justice.

References

Bali, N. (2022). Masalah Tanah Teba di Desa Pejeng Kembali Memanas Rapat Eksekusi

Rencana Perdamaian Malah Mentok. Nusa Bali.

https://www.nusabali.com/berita/128255/masalah-tanah-teba-di-desa-pejeng-kembalimemanas

Dwijayanti, M. (2019). Res judicata. Res Judicata, 2(2), 299–310.

Esmi Warassih. (2016). Ilmu Hukum Kontemplatif. In Penelitian Hukum Interdisipliner Sebuah

Pengantar Menuju Sosio-Legal, (pp. 19–20). Thafa Media.

Hartana. (2020). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ADAT KABUPATEN. Jurnal

Pendidikan Dan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 8(3), 219–227.

Mahfud, M. M. (2010). Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pascaamandemen Konstitusi (Cetakan

ke). Rajawali Pers.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2007). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Perkara

Nomor 31/PUU V/2007 prihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31

Tahun 2007 tentang Pembentukan Kota Tual di Provinsi Maluku.

Noer Fauzi Rachman dan Mia Siscawati. (2014). Masyarakat Hukum Adat Adalah Penyandang

Hak, Subjek Hukum, dan Pemilik Wilayah Adatnya. INSIST Press.

Nurjaya, I. N. (2014). Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Dalam Masyarakat

Multikultural : Perspektif Antropologi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Undiknas, 1(1), 11–25.

Pandapotan Damanik. (2023). Strengthening Land Law Reforms through Legal Pluralism in

Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 1–12.

https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/993/827

Schäublin, B. H. (2013). How Indigenous are the Balinese? From National Marginalisation to

Provincial Domination. In Adat and Indigeneity in Indonesia Culture and Entitlements

between Heteronomy and Self-Ascription (“Göttingen, pp. 133–148). Universitätsverlag

Göttingen

Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Shidarta. (2013). Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum. Genta Publishing.

Simabur, C. A. (2023). Kalah Gugatan Perdata, Lahan-Bangunan di Desa Adat Banjaranyar

Dieksekusi. DetikBali. https://www.detik.com/bali/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-6608260/kalahgugatan-perdata-lahan-bangunan-di-desa-adat-banjaranyar-dieksekusi

Sukabawa, I. W. (2015). Strategi PHDI Meningkatkan Sradha dan Bhakti Umat Hindu di Kota

Palangkaraya Kalimantan Tengah. Vidya Samhita Jurnal Penelitian Agama, Vol. 1(No. 2),

–19. https://ejournal.ihdn.ac.id/index.php/vs/article/view/82/90

Sukirno. (2018). Politik Hukum Pengakuan Hak Ulayat (Cetakan ke). Prenadamedia Group.

Suteki. (2018). Hukum Progresif: Hukum Berdimensi Transendental dalam Konteks

KeIndonesiaan.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001). A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford University Press.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Legal Pluralism Explained History, Theory, Consequences. Oxford

University Press.

Thohir, M. (2019). NUSA, Vol. 14 No. 2 Mei 2019 Mudjahirin Thohir, Etnografi Ideasional

(Suatu Metodologi Penelitian Kebudayaan). Jurnal Nusa, 14(2), 194–205.

Thontowi, J. (2013). Perlindungan Dan Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat Dan Tantangannya Dalam

Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(1), 21–36.

https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss1.art2

Watra, I. W. (2018). Tri Murti Ideologi Sosio-Religius Mempersatukan Sekte-Sekte di Bali.

Jurnal Dharmasmrti, Vol. 9(No. 2), 114–121.

https://ejournal.unhi.ac.id/index.php/dharmasmrti/article/view/153/121

Werner Menski. (2016). Remembering and Applying Legal Pluralism : Law as Kite Flying. In

Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential and Social Science Perspect. Routledge.

Wiana, I. K. (2004). Mengapa Bali Disebut Bali ? Paramita.

Wiguna, M. O. C. (2016). Pengaruh Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Terhadap Penguasaan

Tanah Prabumian Berdasarkan Konsepsi Komunalistik Religius di Bali. Jurnal Hukum

Novelty, Volume 7(Nomor 2), hlm. 182-195.

http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/5466

Wiguna, M. O. C. (2021). Pemikiran Hukum Progresif untuk Perlindungan Hukum dan

Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 112–137.

https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1816

Wiguna, M. O. C. (2023). Implikasi Filsafat Positivisme Terhadap Ilmu Hukum dan

Penegakannya. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 794–805.

https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/374/300