Email this article 
TINDAKAN ULTRA VIRES ORGAN PEMERINTAHAN DAN KONSEKUENSI HUKUMNYA
Copyright (c) 2024 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Abstract
Pasal 17 ayat (2) UUAP yang memosisikan ultra vires sebagai spesies dari genus penyalahgunaan wewenang adalah tidak tepat. Ultra vires merupakan jenis sendiri dari bentuk penyimpangan penggunaan wewenang yang berbeda dari penyalahgunaan wewenang. Konsekuensi hukum tindakan ultra vires organ pemerintahan adalah batal demi hukum yang berarti sejak semula tindakan itu dan akibat hukumnya tidak memiliki eksistensi dalam hukum, bukan tidak sah sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 70 ayat (1) UUAP. Tindakan organ pemerintahan yang batal demi hukum harus dideklarasikan dalam putusan peradilan tata usaha negara bahwa tindakan itu batal demi hukum dan tidak menciptakan atau mengubah keadaan hukum apapun.
Keywords
References
Aguma, K. C. (2012). The Principle of Ultra Vires and the local authorities ’ decisions in England. University of London.
Anggoro, F. N. (2022). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Ratio Legis Pasal 36 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 Tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil). Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 11(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i2.936
Bermann, G. A. (1977). The Scope Of Judicial Review In French Administrative Law. Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 16, 195.
Brynard, D. J. (2013). The Right To Lawful Administrative Action: A Public Administration Perspective. African Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 6, No. (1), Pp. 80–95.
Cardoso, H. R., Knoerr, F. G., & Júnior, E. S. de S. (2020). Restorative Justice as a Conflict Transformation Instrument: An Analysis from Howard Zehr and John Paul Lederach Theories. Relacoes Internacionais No Mundo Atual, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v2i27.3997.
Carrol, A. (2007). Constitutional and Administrative Law. Pearson Education Limited.
Council of Europe. (1996). The administration and you Principles of administrative law concerning the relations between administrative authorities and private persons. Council of Europe Publishing.
Craig, P. (1998). Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review. Cambridge Law Journal, 57(1), 63–90. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2756/.
DYK, Van., Terence, O. (2020). The Influence Of The Oudekraal And Kirland Decisions On The Legal Status Of An Invalid Administrative Action [University of the Free State]. https://scholar.ufs.ac.za/items/0d625fbc-cc4c-4f7d-9e7f-f6bd5adb0eeb
Elliott, M. (1999). The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law. Cambridge University Law Journal, 58(1), 129–158. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal/article/abs/ultra-vires doctrine-in-a-constitutional-setting-still-the-central-principle-of-administrative-law/07F4F7B0014065E8101FA89C46011176.
Endicott, T. (2003). Constitutional Logic (2003) 53. University of Toronto Law Journal, 53, 201–216. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1155022.
Festus, O. T. (2023). Nigerian Law Of Contract : Void And Voidable Contracts. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–7. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4490504.
Forsyth, C. (1996). Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review. The Cambridge Law Journal, 55(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508172.
Forsyth, C. (2012). The legal effect of unlawful administrative acts: the theory of the second actor explained and developed. Amicus Curiae, 2001(35). https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2001i35.1330.
Graaf, Kars J. de., Marseille, Albert T., Tolsma, H. D. (2018). Transparency and Access to Government Information in the Netherlands. In The Laws of Transparency in Action (pp. 163–204). Palgrave Macmillan. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/transparency-and-access-to-government-information-in-the-netherla.
Harrison, J. (2022). Vacatur of Rules Under the Administrative Procedure Act. Yale Journal on Regulation, 40(119), 119–134. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.yalejreg.com/wp-content/uploads/Harrison.-Vacatur-Under-the-APA-FINAL-Publication-Version.pdf.
Harrison, J. C. (2023). Remand Without Vacatur and the Ab Initio Invalidity of Unlawful Regulations in Administrative Law. Brigham Young University Law Review. https://www.law.virginia.edu/scholarship/publication/john-c-harrison/1595481.
Henrico, R. (2021). The Functus Officio Doctrine and Invalid Administrative Action in South African Administrative Law: A Flexible Approach. Speculum Juris, 34(2), 115–129. http://hdl.handle.net/10566/6201.
Lee, J. . T. (2016). Rethinking the Presumption of Constitutionality. In Neo, J.L. (Eds.), Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
Minattur, J. (1958). French administrative law. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 173, 364–376. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16330.
Nur, S., & Susanto, H. (2020). Larangan Ultra Vires ( Exces De Pouvoir ) dalam Tindakan Pemerintahan ( Studi Komparasi Konsep Antara Sistem Hukum Anglo Saxon Dan Sistem Hukum Kontinental ). 3(2), 260–271.
Parchomiuk, J. (2024). Abuse of Discretionary Powers in Administrative Law. Evolution of the Judicial Review Models: from “Administrative Morality” to the Principle of Proportionality. Časopis pro Právní Vědu a Prax, 26(3), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2018-3-4.
Putra, H. P. (2020). Penilaian Terhadap Batal Atau Tidak Sahnya Suatu Assessment Regarding The Nullity Or Invalidity Of A Governmental Administrative Decision And / Or Action I. Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3, No. 1, Pp. 35–50, https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.312020.35-50.
Qtaishat, A. K. (2025). The Doctrine of Ultra Vires : Commendable or Condemnable ! Asian Social Science; V, 16(5), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v16n5p148.
Schaefer, J. A. (2010). Beyond a Definition : Understanding the Nature of Void and Voidable Contracts. Campbell Law Review, Vol. 33, No. (1), Pp. 192–209.
Simanjuntak, E. P. (2018). Pengujian Ada Tidaknya Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan / Examination To Determine The Presence Or Absence Of Abuse Of Authority According To Government Administration Law. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.237-262.
Venice Commission. (2005). “Administrative Justice And Inter-Ministerial Communication Within Public Administration.”Report from Venice Commission, Retrieved May, 29th 2024.
Venice Commission. (2011). Report on the Rule of Law. In the Commission at its 86th Plenary Session. Report from Venice Commission, Retrieved May, 29th 2024.
Wijoyo, S. (2005). Karakteristik Hukum Acara Peradilan Administrasi: Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Surabaya : Airlangga University Press. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20461928.
Wright, R. G. (2010). Arbitrariness : Why the Most Important Idea in Administrative Law Can ’ t Be Defined , and What This Means for the Law in General. University of Richmond Law Review, 44(2), 838–865. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol44/iss2/6/.
Yang, B. M. (2014). Void Versus Voidable Contracts : The Subtle Distinction That Can Affect Good-Faith Purchasers ’ Title to Goods. NYSBA NYLitigator, 19(1), 31–35.
