DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.53.2.2024.145-154

TINDAKAN ULTRA VIRES ORGAN PEMERINTAHAN DAN KONSEKUENSI HUKUMNYA

*A'an Efendi  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Sudarsono Sudarsono  -  Perkumpulan Peneliti Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Article 17 paragraph (2) of the Government Administration Law which positions ultra vires as a species in the genus abuse of power is incorrect. Ultra vires is its own type of deviation from the use of power which is different from abuse of power. The legal consequences of ultra vires actions by government organs are null and void, which means that from the beginning the action and its legal consequences have no existence in law, and are not invalid as stipulated in Article 70 paragraph (1) of the Government Administration Law. Actions of government organs that are null and void must be declared in a state administrative court decision that the action is null and void and does not create or change any legal situation.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Ultra Vires; Null And Void; Declaratory Relief

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
TINDAKAN ULTRA VIRES ORGAN PEMERINTAHAN DAN KONSEKUENSI HUKUMNYA PERLINDUNGAN DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI PENGENDALI DATA PRIBADI DI MASA DEPAN EKSISTENSI DAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS PIDANA MATI MENURUT UUD 1945 BERKAITAN DENGAN TUJUAN HUKUM ISLAM More recent articles
Most cited articles
PERLINDUNGAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL FORMULASI MODEL PENGELOLAAN HAK ULAYAT LAUT DI PROVINSI MALUKU REHABILITASI DALAM UPAYA DERADIKALISASI NARAPIDANA TERORISME MARRIAGE LAW AND DIVORCE BASED ON ADAT LAW IN BALI INDEKS More cited articles
  1. Aguma, K. C. (2012). The Principle of Ultra Vires and the local authorities ’ decisions in England. University of London
  2. Anggoro, F. N. (2022). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Ratio Legis Pasal 36 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 Tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil). Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 11(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i2.936
  3. Bermann, G. A. (1977). The Scope Of Judicial Review In French Administrative Law. Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 16, 195
  4. Brynard, D. J. (2013). The Right To Lawful Administrative Action: A Public Administration Perspective. African Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 6, No. (1), Pp. 80–95
  5. Cardoso, H. R., Knoerr, F. G., & Júnior, E. S. de S. (2020). Restorative Justice as a Conflict Transformation Instrument: An Analysis from Howard Zehr and John Paul Lederach Theories. Relacoes Internacionais No Mundo Atual, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v2i27.3997
  6. Carrol, A. (2007). Constitutional and Administrative Law. Pearson Education Limited
  7. Council of Europe. (1996). The administration and you Principles of administrative law concerning the relations between administrative authorities and private persons. Council of Europe Publishing
  8. Craig, P. (1998). Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review. Cambridge Law Journal, 57(1), 63–90. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2756/
  9. DYK, Van., Terence, O. (2020). The Influence Of The Oudekraal And Kirland Decisions On The Legal Status Of An Invalid Administrative Action [University of the Free State]. https://scholar.ufs.ac.za/items/0d625fbc-cc4c-4f7d-9e7f-f6bd5adb0eeb
  10. Elliott, M. (1999). The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law. Cambridge University Law Journal, 58(1), 129–158. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal/article/abs/ultra-vires doctrine-in-a-constitutional-setting-still-the-central-principle-of-administrative-law/07F4F7B0014065E8101FA89C46011176
  11. Endicott, T. (2003). Constitutional Logic (2003) 53. University of Toronto Law Journal, 53, 201–216. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1155022
  12. Festus, O. T. (2023). Nigerian Law Of Contract : Void And Voidable Contracts. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–7. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4490504
  13. Forsyth, C. (1996). Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review. The Cambridge Law Journal, 55(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508172
  14. Forsyth, C. (2012). The legal effect of unlawful administrative acts: the theory of the second actor explained and developed. Amicus Curiae, 2001(35). https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2001i35.1330
  15. Graaf, Kars J. de., Marseille, Albert T., Tolsma, H. D. (2018). Transparency and Access to Government Information in the Netherlands. In The Laws of Transparency in Action (pp. 163–204). Palgrave Macmillan. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/transparency-and-access-to-government-information-in-the-netherla
  16. Harrison, J. (2022). Vacatur of Rules Under the Administrative Procedure Act. Yale Journal on Regulation, 40(119), 119–134. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://www.yalejreg.com/wp-content/uploads/Harrison.-Vacatur-Under-the-APA-FINAL-Publication-Version.pdf
  17. Harrison, J. C. (2023). Remand Without Vacatur and the Ab Initio Invalidity of Unlawful Regulations in Administrative Law. Brigham Young University Law Review. https://www.law.virginia.edu/scholarship/publication/john-c-harrison/1595481
  18. Henrico, R. (2021). The Functus Officio Doctrine and Invalid Administrative Action in South African Administrative Law: A Flexible Approach. Speculum Juris, 34(2), 115–129. http://hdl.handle.net/10566/6201
  19. Lee, J. . T. (2016). Rethinking the Presumption of Constitutionality. In Neo, J.L. (Eds.), Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Theory and Practice. Routledge
  20. Minattur, J. (1958). French administrative law. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 173, 364–376. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16330
  21. Nur, S., & Susanto, H. (2020). Larangan Ultra Vires ( Exces De Pouvoir ) dalam Tindakan Pemerintahan ( Studi Komparasi Konsep Antara Sistem Hukum Anglo Saxon Dan Sistem Hukum Kontinental ). 3(2), 260–271
  22. Parchomiuk, J. (2024). Abuse of Discretionary Powers in Administrative Law. Evolution of the Judicial Review Models: from “Administrative Morality” to the Principle of Proportionality. Časopis pro Právní Vědu a Prax, 26(3), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2018-3-4
  23. Putra, H. P. (2020). Penilaian Terhadap Batal Atau Tidak Sahnya Suatu Assessment Regarding The Nullity Or Invalidity Of A Governmental Administrative Decision And / Or Action I. Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3, No. 1, Pp. 35–50, https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.312020.35-50
  24. Qtaishat, A. K. (2025). The Doctrine of Ultra Vires : Commendable or Condemnable ! Asian Social Science; V, 16(5), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v16n5p148
  25. Schaefer, J. A. (2010). Beyond a Definition : Understanding the Nature of Void and Voidable Contracts. Campbell Law Review, Vol. 33, No. (1), Pp. 192–209
  26. Simanjuntak, E. P. (2018). Pengujian Ada Tidaknya Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan / Examination To Determine The Presence Or Absence Of Abuse Of Authority According To Government Administration Law. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.237-262
  27. Venice Commission. (2005). “Administrative Justice And Inter-Ministerial Communication Within Public Administration.”Report from Venice Commission, Retrieved May, 29th 2024
  28. Venice Commission. (2011). Report on the Rule of Law. In the Commission at its 86th Plenary Session. Report from Venice Commission, Retrieved May, 29th 2024
  29. Wijoyo, S. (2005). Karakteristik Hukum Acara Peradilan Administrasi: Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Surabaya : Airlangga University Press. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20461928
  30. Wright, R. G. (2010). Arbitrariness : Why the Most Important Idea in Administrative Law Can ’ t Be Defined , and What This Means for the Law in General. University of Richmond Law Review, 44(2), 838–865. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol44/iss2/6/
  31. Yang, B. M. (2014). Void Versus Voidable Contracts : The Subtle Distinction That Can Affect Good-Faith Purchasers ’ Title to Goods. NYSBA NYLitigator, 19(1), 31–35

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-25 21:47:39

No citation recorded.