DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.3.2025.446-461

RE-EVALUATION OF CREDITOR PROTECTION IN MORTGAGE ENFORCEMENT: THE LEGAL PERSPECTIVES OF THE AUCTION ENFORCEMENT OF MORTGAGE OBJECTS UNDER THE INDONESIAN LAW

*Ayup Suran Ningsih orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Norhaini Binti Nion  -  Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch, Malaysia
Paramita Prananingtyas  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Harumsari Puspa Wardhani  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This paper discusses the usage and application of mortgage rights in Indonesia, especially Law No. 4 of 1996, which is intended to offer legal protection to the creditors and debtors in credit agreements. The collateralized debt agreements are frequently used in business financing, and land is usually the security since it is not prone to fluctuations. With the introduction of the Mortgage Rights Act, a more established framework of such agreements has been made, and legal certainty of creditors has been increased through giving them the power to make claims against collateral in the event of default of the debtor. Nevertheless, the application of mortgage rights, especially in the implementation process, is not without problems, though it has its benefits. Creditors can also challenge laws: a third party can claim them, or a debtor can challenge their efforts, and legal challenges by creditors are not always straightforward to execute due to procedural hold-ups. The law offers preventative legal security in the form of clear agreements and valid collateral instruments. Yet, it is full of repressive provisions, given that creditors are also granted legal action in the event of default. The paper puts a lot of emphasis on the need to balance the interests of the creditors and the interests of the debtors and emphasizes the necessity of having a lean and efficient process. Although the decision of the creditors to buy the mortgage rights presents substantial benefits, the mechanism of overcoming the process of the auction and the ability to guarantee the best outcomes to all participants can be improved. In general, the paper highlights the necessity to develop such legal frameworks further in order to make the goals of the Mortgage Rights Act to the fullest extent, to provide a more stable and reliable financial environment.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Mortgage Rights; Legal Protection; Credit Agreements; Collateral; Indonesia

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
MEDIASI PENAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PENGGELAPAN BENDA JAMINAN FIDUSIA PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PENGGANTI DALAM HUKUM PAJAK DI INDONESIA PERAN STRATEGIS PERGURUAN TINGGI DALAM PERCEPATAN PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI KONFLIK STATUS HUKUM TANAH TIMBUL DI WILAYAH PESISIR PROVINSI BALI REHABILITASI DALAM UPAYA DERADIKALISASI NARAPIDANA TERORISME More cited articles
  1. Abas, U., Marthin, S., & Kariadi, K. (2025). Juridical Review of Mortgage Enforcement on Ships and Its Legal Effects. Journal of Law Justice, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33506/jlj.v3i1.3794
  2. Agustino, L. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Politik. Intrans Publishing
  3. Ahmad, A. (2021). Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan (Studi Pt Bank Danamon Parepare). Economix, 3(1). https://ojs.unm.ac.id/economix/article/view/18951/10068
  4. Aprilia, W. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Penjualan di Bawah Tangan atas Objek Jaminan yang Diikat dengan Fidusia pada Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Cabang Samarinda KCP Unit Sungai Pinang Dalam. Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum), 6(2), 1-14. http://ejurnal.untag-smd.ac.id/index.php/DD/article/view/5072
  5. Ariningsih, N. M., & Julianti, lis. (2022). Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial Pada Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan Terhadap Jaminan Hak Milik Atas Tanah (Studi Kasus PT. BPR TISH Batubulan, Sukawati, Gianyar). Jurnal Hukum Mahasiswa, 2(1), 234–244. https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/jhm/article/view/4510
  6. Badrulzaman, M. D. (1981). Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 dan Penjabarannya di dalam Hukum Perjanjian Nasional. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 11(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol11.no1.837
  7. Bisyir, D. A. (2023). Problematika dalam Pelaksanaan Hak Tanggungan Elektronik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah. Journal of Private Law, 11(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.45370
  8. Chen, G., Busababodhin, P., & Chutiman, N. (2024). Credit Risk Analysis of Micro and Small Enterprises Based on Big Data-Driven Logistic Regression Models of Bank Credit Records. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Information and Big Data Applications, CIBDA ’24, 1182–1186. https://doi.org/10.1145/3671151.3671357
  9. Dameria, F. A., & Djajaputra, G. (2024). Juridical Analysis of Transfer of Mortgage Rights Guarantee Through Cessie From the Perspective of Consumer Protection Law. Awang Long Law Review, 6(2), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v6i2.1205
  10. Dhobe, S. D., Tighare, K. K., & Dake, S. S. (2020). A Review on Prevention of Fraud in Electronic Payment Gateway Using Secret Code. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 3(1), 602-604. https://www.ijresm.com/Vol.3_2020/Vol3_Iss1_January20/IJRESM_V3_I1_160.pdf
  11. Djatmiko, A. A. (2021). Aktualisasi Prinsip 5C (Prinsip-Prinsip Lima) Pada Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah Belum Bersertifikat. Yustitiabelen, 3(1), 129-157. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v3i1.133
  12. Goel, R., Garg, V., & Floris, M. (2024). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Business and Finance 5.0. CRC Press
  13. H Kamelo. (2022). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan. In Jakarta: Penerbit Alumni
  14. Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum Dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Bina Ilmu
  15. Halim, C., & Setyawan, V. P. (2024). Legal Protection For Creditors in Increasing Satisfaction in Credit Agreements with Liens as Collateral. Santhet: Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.36526/js.v3i2
  16. Hantzsche, A. (2022). Fiscal Uncertainty and Sovereign Credit Risk. European Economic Review, 148, 104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104245
  17. Hardiyansyah, T., & Tjempaka. (2025). Legal Protection for Debtors Acting in Good Faith in Fulfilling Obligations to Unidentified Creditors. Awang Long Law Review, 7(2), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v7i2.1555
  18. Hendrawan, D., Waluyo, B. M., & Gunawan, J. (2025). Reinforcing Creditor Protection: The Imperative for The Cross-Border Insolvency Regulation. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(7), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.14419/nngsr855
  19. Heriawanto, B. K. (2019). Implementation of Fiduciary Object Execution Based on Executorial Title. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8958
  20. Heriawanto, B. K. (2019b). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8958
  21. Imanda, N. (2020). Lahirnya Hak Tanggungan Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Agraria Tentang Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik. Notaire, 3(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v3i1.17536
  22. Jufri, S., Borahima, A., & Said, N. (2020). Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Balai Lelang. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 4(2), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.35973/jidh.v4i2.1379
  23. Katta, B. (2025). Hybrid AI Models: Exploring Streaming Data in the Financial Sector. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 15(2), 2503–2512. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2025.15.2.0804
  24. Keisya, F. D., Berti, A. Y. Z., Dafitra, T. I., & Citra, H. (2024). Analisis Aspek Hukum dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank dengan Jaminan Kebendaan. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 1(1), 10–13. https://jurnal.globalscients.com/index.php/jkhpk/article/view/89
  25. Lailiyah, A. (2014). Urgensi Analisa 5C pada Pemberian Kredit Perbankan untuk Meminimalisir Resiko. Yuridika, 29(2), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i2.368
  26. Lestari, I. I., & Waluyo. (2024). Legal Review of Parate Executie of Mortgage Rights in Protecting The Rights of Separate Creditors in Bankruptcy Proceedings. Equalegium: International Law Journal, 2(10), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.61543/equ.v2i3.86
  27. Martokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty
  28. Masturi, F. N., Asep Herlan, & Al Fiani Nenden Iryatin. (2025). Problems with Mortgage Rights on Inherited Property. Judge : Jurnal Hukum, 6(3), 439-447. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i03.1517
  29. Muhammad, R. N. P. (2018). Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Karena Wanprestasi Terhadap Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Lex Et Societatis, 6(10), 14-20. ttps://doi.org/10.35796/les.v6i10.22823
  30. Mulyati, E. (2018). Penerapan Manajemen Risiko sebagai Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dalam Pemberian Kredit Perbankan. Supremasi Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.36441/supremasi.v1i1.155
  31. Ningsih, A. S. (2020). Legal Review of Financial Technology Peer-to-Peer Lending Based on Indonesian Collateral Law Perspective. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.73
  32. Ningsih, A. S. (2021). The Legal Protection For Debtors In The Execution Of Mortgage At The Semarang State Assets And Auction Service Office. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah, 12(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v12i1.12112
  33. Ningsih, A. S. (2023). Alternative Institutions on Dispute Settlement for the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) in Banking Disputes. Fiat Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no3.2967
  34. Ningsih, A. S. (2025). Creditor of Fiduciary Facing Bankruptcy: What Should They Do? Diponegoro Law Review, 10(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025
  35. Ningsih, A. S., & Disemadi, H. S. (2019). Breach of Contract: An Indonesian Experience in Credit Akad of Sharia Banking. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 19(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v19i1.89-102
  36. Ningsih, A. S., Fidiyani, R., & Wardhani, H. P. (2024). Mortgage Rights for The Sharia Banking Murābaḥah Contract : Its Position and Application. Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial, 21(2), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v21i2.9626
  37. Ningsih, A. S., Niravita, A., Fibrianti, N., Fidiyani, R., Wedhatami, B., Damayanti, R., Maharani, F. T., & Wardhani, H. P. (2025). Realizing the Importance of Rupiah Digital to Achieve Economic Growth in Sustainable Development Goals. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2024 (IJCAH 2024). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-317-7_132
  38. Nugrohandhini, D., & Mulyati, E. (2019). Akibat Hukum Gugatan dan Perlawanan terhadap Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 4(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4n1
  39. Nwanneka Ezechi, O., Famoti, O., Paul-Mikki Ewim, C., Eloho, O., Muyiwa-Ajayi, T. P., Ngochindo Igwe, A., & Ifeanyi Ibeh, A. (2025). Service Quality Improvement in the Banking Sector: A Data Analytics Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 5(1), 958-971. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.1.3749
  40. Permana, D., & Nurudin, A. (2023). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kredit Macet Di Lembaga Pembiayaan. Jurnal Akta Notaris, 2(2), 242-261. https://doi.org/10.56444/aktanotaris.v2i2.1244
  41. Putra, F. M. K. (2014). Eksistensi Kreditor Separatis sebagai Pemohon dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Perspektif, 19(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v19i1.606
  42. Res, R. (2021). Implementation of Parate Executie Object of Liability. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.6
  43. Rumawi, R., Basuki, U., Towadi, M., & Supianto, S. (2022). Parate Executie dalam Fidusia Menurut Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3), 554-579. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1933
  44. Saraswati, A. F. A. (2015). Dilematis Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Parate Executie dan Eksekusi Melalui Grosse Akta. Sebelas Maret University
  45. Schulze, W.G. (2005). Parate Executie and Public Policy. The Supreme Court of Appeal Provides Further Guidelines. Obiter, 26(3), 710-718. https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v26i3.14633
  46. Sindra, S. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Binamulia Hukum, 9(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v9i1.361
  47. Siregar, N. R., & Mekka Putra, M. F. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Kekuatan Eksekutorial Terhadap Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Debitur Wanprestasi. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 5(1), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4872
  48. Sumanto, L., Eka Sihombing, I., Pandamdari, E., Mariane, I., & Kartikasari, E. (2024). Transformation of Mortgage Rights Registration by Electronic System. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i21.14734
  49. Syamsiah, D., & Nurviana, R. (2022). Perspektif Hukum Eksekusi atas Objek Dibebani Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpss.v6i1.5374
  50. Tahir, C. M., Sriwati, & Putri, D. S. (2024). Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection for Creditors on Mortgage Rights Canceled by Decision. JLPH: Journal of Law, Politics and Humanities, 5(2), 1129–1136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2
  51. Tambunan, S., Sudirman, M., & Mustafa, M. E. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Debitor dan Penjamin Perorangan yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Bisnis Mahasiswa, 5(1), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.60036/jbm.v5i1.366
  52. Triwibowo, B., & Arifulloh, A. (2025). Legal Protection for Creditors Over Mortgage Rights Cancelled by Court Decisions (Court Decision Study) No. 136/Pdt.G/2019 Pn Ckr). Tabellius Journal of Law, 3(3), 1122–1136. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/tabelius/article/view/47977
  53. Ulhad, M. F., & Amelia, M. (2023). Konsep Hukum Pada Gugatan Kasus Perdata Wanprestasi Akibat Kredit Macet. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 4(2), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.4.2.6108
  54. Utomo, Y. A. (2011). Parate Executie pada Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Perlindungan Aset Kreditor dan Debitor. Yuridika, 26(2), 176–202. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v26i2.270
  55. Wibisono, H. (2022). Legal Protections for Debtors of Banks Providing Mortgage in Facing Execution Parates. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 5(1), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V5-i1-20
  56. Widiarty, W. S. (2020). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Publika Global Media
  57. Wijaya, I. W. A. P., & Sahruddin, S. (2021). Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah Melalui Penjualan Di Bawah Tangan Atas Jaminan Fidusia: (Studi di PT. Pegadaian Cabang Karang Jasi Mataram). Private Law, 1(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v1i1.2698
  58. Yuhelson, & Hakim, N. (2025). Legal Protection of Secured Creditors in Contemporary Bankruptcy: A Comparative Study of Positive Law and Islamic Law. MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1189–1214. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11518

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-03-11 10:31:29

No citation recorded.