DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.1.2025.69-79

TRANSFORMING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN INDONESIA’S ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: THE ROLE OF LEGAL CULTURE IN THE SOCIETY 5.0 ERA

*Brata Yoga Lumbanraja  -  Doctor of Law Program, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Yos Johan Utama  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Aju Putrijanti  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Evis Garunja  -  Faculty of Political Sciences and Law, University Aleksandër Moisiu of Durrës, Albania
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study explores the integration of technology in Indonesia’s Administrative Court system, particularly the impact of electronic justice (e-court) in the Society 5.0 era. With advancements in technology reshaping societal functions, the study examines how these changes have influenced legal proceedings within the Administrative Court. The research focuses on the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019, which governs e-court proceedings, and how these technological advancements align with Indonesia’s legal culture and the values of Pancasila, particularly social justice. It highlights fundamental shifts, such as the introduction of electronic summons, electronic domicile, and online hearings, as part of the modernization of judicial processes. Through qualitative research and doctrinal legal analysis, this study emphasizes the significance of legal culture in ensuring the smooth transition to digital procedures and fostering public awareness of citizens’ rights and obligations. The findings suggest that while technological progress in the court system brings efficiency, the successful adoption of these changes requires legal culture to promote public understanding and participation, ultimately supporting the realization of social justice as outlined by Pancasila.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Electronic Proceedings; Legal Culture; Pancasila; Society 5.0; Administrative Court

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
REFORMING COPYRIGHT FOR THE PARTICIPATIVE WEB: BALANCING CREATOR RIGHTS AND USER CREATIVITY REFORMING INDONESIA'S AGRICULTURAL LEGAL SYSTEM: EMPOWERING FAMILY-BASED FARMERS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY INTEGRATION EMPOWERING WOMEN WORKERS IN KRETEK AND BEEDI INDUSTRIES: LEGAL REFORMS FOR SAFETY, EQUALITY, AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE More recent articles
Most cited articles
URGENSI HUKUM PERIZINAN DAN PENEGAKANNYA SEBAGAI SARANA PENCEGAHAN PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP MARRIAGE LAW AND DIVORCE BASED ON ADAT LAW IN BALI DESAIN SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN PRESIDENSIAL YANG EFEKTIF Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta FAKTOR KRIMINOGEN ILLEGAL MINING TIMAH DI BANGKA BELITUNG More cited articles
  1. Afandi, M. N., & Purwanto, B. H. (2019). The Impact of New Regulations in the Implementation of Regional Medium-term Development Plan (RPJMD) in West Java Province. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Administration Science (ICAS 2019). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Administration Science (ICAS 2019), Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icas-19.2019.49
  2. Alojaiman, B. (2023). Technological Modernizations in the Industry 5.0 Era: A Descriptive Analysis and Future Research Directions. Processes, 11(5), 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051318
  3. Arief, B. N. (2021). Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional (Indonesia). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
  4. Aritonang, D. M. (2024). The Role of the Administrative Court to Promote Administrative Reform in Indonesia. In A. Rahman, S. Dwiputrianti, & M. N. Afandi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS 2022) (Vol. 776, pp. 480–490). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_46
  5. Bicchieri, C., Muldoon, R., & Sontuoso, A. (2023). Social Norms. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/social-norms/
  6. Cahyono, A. S., Zauhar, S., & Domai, T. (2022). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Berbasis E-Government Pada Pengadilan Agama Kelas I A Tulungagung. Publiciana, 15(2), 82–97
  7. Calp, M. H., & Bütüner, R. (2022). Chapter 7—Society 5.0: Effective Technology for a Smart Society. In A. E. Hassanien, J. M. Chatterjee, & V. Jain (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Industry 4.0 (pp. 175–194). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88468-6.00006-1
  8. Cotterrell, R. (2017). Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Routledge
  9. Darmaputera, E. (1988). Pancasila and the search for identity and modernity in Indonesian society: A cultural and ethical analysis. Brill
  10. Fibrianti, N., Santoso, B., Setyowati, R., & Rindyawati, Y. (2023). Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness of Consumers: The Influence on Regulation and Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), 1267–1310. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69336
  11. Frissen, P. (1999). Politics, governance, and technology: A postmodern narrative on the virtual state. Edward Elgar
  12. Gestel, R. V., & Micklitz, H. (2011). Revitalizing Doctrinal Legal Research in Europe: What About Methodology? EUI Working Paper LAW, 05, 1–38. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/16825
  13. Gladden, M. E. (2019). Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies. Social Sciences, 8(5), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050148
  14. Gulland, J. (2022). Social Justice and Administrative Justice. In M. Hertogh, R. Kirkham, R. Thomas, & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Administrative Justice (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.013.14
  15. Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70
  16. Kurniawan, M. B. (2020). Implementation of Electronic Trial (e-Litigation) on the Civil Cases in Indonesia Court as a Legal Renewal of Civil Procedural Law. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 9(1), 43–70
  17. Latifiani, D., Sarono, A., Pudjirahayu, E. W., Widigdo, S. A., & Nugraha, N. A. (2023). Implementation of Simple, Fast and Low-Cost Principles in E-Summons with the E-Court System. Diponegoro Law Review, 8(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.8.1.2023.107-123
  18. Lolich, L., & Timonen, V. (2022). Digitalisation of Public Services as a Challenge to Social Justice. In M. A. Yerkes & M. Bal (Eds.), Solidarity and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding Inequalities (pp. 191–200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_18
  19. Mansyur, F. A., Arsad, A., Suherman, L. O. A., Himah, I., Zaka, I., Zilani, Z., & Syarifuddin, I. (2023). Languange Learning Adapatation Model In The Era of Society 5.0. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(4), 686–693. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i4.21499
  20. Minow, M. (2013). Archetypal Legal Scholarship: A Field Guide. Journal of Legal Education, 63(1), 65–69. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42894327
  21. Nurhasan, N., Ravena, D., & Ruhaeni, N. (2022). Integration of Fisheries Law Enforcement Regulations in the Indonesian Maritime Zone: 4th Social and Humanities Research Symposium (SoRes 2021), Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220407.054
  22. Nurjihad, N., & Ariyanto, A. (2022). Electronic Trial At The Supreme Court: Needs, Challenges And Arrangement. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 11(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i2.16348
  23. Pound, R. (2017). Social Control Through Law. Taylor & Francis
  24. Putrijanti, A. (2020). The Competence of the Administrative Court and Administrative Justice. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1890
  25. Rahardjo, S. (2005). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 1(1), 1–24
  26. Rahayu, D. P., Faisal, F., Sari, R., & Satrio, N. (2020). Law Enforcement in the Context of Legal Culture in Society. Law Reform, 16(2), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33780
  27. Sa’adah, N., Indriawati, S. E., Widodo, G., & Setyowati, S. (2021). Validity of the Evidence of the Agreement Through Electronics Reviewed from Article 1866 Civil Code. 688–692
  28. Saputra, A. E., & Mirsafa, L. (2023). Educators’ Life Skills in the Era of Smart Society 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 8(4), 1345–1350
  29. Sugiarto, T., Asnawi, N., & Hadinata, F. (2023). Reading “Socio-Democracy” of Pancasila Through Gadamer’s Hermeneutics. International Review of Humanities Studies, 8(2), 351–381. https://doi.org/10.7454/irhs.v8i2.111
  30. Sukmadinata, N. S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  31. Taher, P. (2021). Pancasila as The Basis of The State Unity of The Republic of Indonesia. Pancasila and Law Review, 2(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v2i2.2449
  32. Travis, L. (2017). Introduction to Criminal Justice. Taylor & Francis
  33. Velicogna, M. (2011). Electronic access to justice: From theory to practice and back. Droit et Cultures. Revue Internationale Interdisciplinaire, 61. https://doi.org/10.4000/droitcultures.2447
  34. Wibowo, A. T. (2020). The Impact of The Development of Investment and Construction on The Land Reform Years in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 19(3), 745–775. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2019.19.3.2597
  35. Widodo, R. M. W. N., Rahmanto, D. N., Saragih, H., & Sihotang, S. B. M. (2024). Pancasila Di Era Globalisasi Dan Digitalisasi: Panduan Memahami dan Mengamalkan Pancasila dalam Konteks Modern. Deepublish
  36. Wood, J. C., & Wood, M. C. (2005). Peter F. Drucker: Critical Evaluations in Business and Management. Routledge
  37. Yoesuf, J. P., Ramadhansyah, F., Elviyanti, S., & Salamah, A. (2023). Strengthening the Implementation of E-Court-Based Judiciary as A Legal Protection in The Implementation of E-Litigation-Based Trials. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 12(2), 293–318

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-26 06:50:05

No citation recorded.