DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.1.1.2025.%25p

MULTI RUANG MULTI PENGGUNA MULTI WAKTU: TEMPORALITAS SEBAGAI STRATEGI ARSITEKTUR

*Bramasta Putra Redyantanu orcid scopus  -  Department of Architecutre, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk merefleksikan gagasan temporalitas atau kesementaraan sebagai potensi dalam perancangan spasial arsitektur yang adaptif dan fleksibel. Fleksibilitas dan adaptabilitas merupakan nilai tambah signifikan dalam karya perancangan. Kemampuan sebuah ruang untuk digunakan dalam berbagai situasi berbeda, dengan penyesuaian konfigurasi tanpa memerlukan tambahan luas spasial, memungkinkan efektivitas dan efisiensi ruangnya. Arsitektur hadir dengan berbagai kemungkinan, di mana variasi prediksinya merupakan bagian dari pemrograman dalam perancangan. Studi kualitatif ini merefleksikan dua studi kasus dari observasi dan penelusuran literatur terkait spasial yang memiliki unsur kesementaraan. Dua studi kasus ini mewakili temporalitas melalui pembacaan praktik spasial masyarakat serta temporalitas dalam pertimbangan perancangan arsitektur. Aspek temporalitas waktu, ruang, dan pengguna menjadi basis pembacaan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa temporalitas, baik dalam praktik spasial maupun perancangan spasial, mengindikasikan upaya merespons kedinamisan penggunaan spasial dengan dinamika kemungkinannya. Temuan dalam studi ini diusulkan sebagai gagasan konseptual berupa prinsip dan strategi perancangan, yang diharapkan mampu menjadi basis bagi beragam konteks perancangan yang menuntut fleksibilitas dan adaptabilitas ruang.

Fulltext
Keywords: arsitektur, adaptif, fleksibel, perancangan, temporalitas

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
MULTI RUANG MULTI PENGGUNA MULTI WAKTU: TEMPORALITAS SEBAGAI STRATEGI ARSITEKTUR More recent articles
Most cited articles
EVALUASI SISTEM PROTEKSI KEBAKARAN PADA BANGUNAN RUMAH SUSUN (STUDI KASUS : RUSUNAWA UNDIP) KAJIAN PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH KAMPUS JURUSAN ARSITEKTUR FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO RESPON RUMAH TRADISIONAL KUDUS TERHADAP IKLIM TROPIS Simulasi Intensitas Suara Dari Model Bukaan Jendela Pada Bangunan Kuno Di Semarang IMPLEMENTING MIXED LAND USE ROOTING JANE JACOBS’ CONCEPT OF DIVERSITY IN URBAN SUSTAINABILITY More cited articles
  1. Andaloro, B., de Waal, M., Suurenbroek, F., Andaloro, B., de Waal, M., & Suurenbroek, F. (2022). Adaptive public spaces
  2. Ardianta, D. A., Yatmo, Y. A., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2023). Body’s Movement as Drawing: Notation and Annotation in The Construction of Space at Alun-Alun Solo. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 6(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2023-si6(1)-07
  3. Arisya, K. F., & Suryantini, R. (2021). Modularity in design for disassembly (DfD): exploring the strategy for a better sustainable architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 738(1), 12024
  4. Asefi, M., & Foruzandeh, A. (2011). Nature and kinetic architecture: The development of a new type of transformable structure for temporary applications. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5(6)
  5. Augé, M. (2020). Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity. Verso Books
  6. Boucsein, B. (2021). What the Files Reveal: Making Everyday Architecture Talk. Dimensions, 1(1), 163–172
  7. Cantley, B. (2023). Speculative Coolness: Architecture, Media, the Real, and the Virtual. Taylor & Francis
  8. Creswell, J. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design : choosing among five approaches. SAGE
  9. D’Oria, M. (2022). Mean Time. Expiring Architecture
  10. Damayanti, R. (2005). Kawasan" Pusat Kota" Dalam Perkembangan Sejarah Perkotaan Di Jawa. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 33(1)
  11. Ek, F. I. (2023). Time in the Shell: Temporality as a Mode of Spatiality in Japanese Understanding. UOU Scientific Journal, 06
  12. Enia, M., & Martella, F. (2020). Architecture beyond permanence: temporariness in 21 st century urban architecture. EAAE--ARCC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València
  13. Foucault, M., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Space, knowledge, and power. Material Culture, 107–120
  14. Frankel, L., & Racine, M. (2010). The Complex Field of Research: for Design, through Design, and about Design in durling, D., Bousbaci, R., Chen, L, Gauthier, P., Poldma, T., Roworth-Stokes, S. and Stotlterman, E. (eds.). 7–9. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2010/researchpapers/43
  15. Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0jADDQAAQBAJ
  16. Harris, E., & Coleman, R. (2020). The social life of time and methods: Studying London’s temporal architectures. Time & Society, 29(2), 604–631
  17. Hernan, L., & Ramirez-Figueroa, C. (2021). Time is out of Joint: Digital Domesticity and Magical Realism. Journal of Architectural Education, 75(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2021.1947672
  18. Hopkins, O. (2023). Architects in Multispace. Architectural Design, 93(6), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2988
  19. Jacobs, J. (1992). The death and life of great American cities. 1961. New York: Vintage, 321, 9783839413272--099
  20. Judson, D. R. (2011). Beyond space?: Exploring the temporality of architecture. Carleton University
  21. Jung, H., & Park, S. (2022). Pavilion as an architecture of new placeness : a case of Serpentine Pavilion project. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.2024197
  22. Kidd, A. N. (2021). Affect, Architecture, and Practice: Toward a Disruptive Temporality of Practice. Routledge
  23. Koolhaas, R. (2014). Delirious New York: a retroactive manifesto for Manhattan. The Monacelli Press, LLC
  24. Kunawong, M. (2019). Temporality Dimensions in Architecture: The intervention of time perception
  25. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. The Production of Space. https://doi.org/10.2307/490789
  26. Lucas, R. (2016). Research methods for architecture. Hachette UK
  27. Matheou, M., Phocas, M. C., Christoforou, E. G., & Müller, A. (2023). New perspectives in architecture through transformable structures: A simulation study. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1051337
  28. May, J., & Thrift, N. (2003). Timespace: geographies of temporality (Vol. 13). Routledge
  29. Musa, M. F., Yusof, M. R., Mohammad, M. F., & Samsudin, N. S. (2016). Towards the adoption of modular construction and prefabrication in the construction environment: A case study in Malaysia. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(13), 8122–8131
  30. Norberg-Schulz, C. (2019). Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture (1979). Historic Cities: Issues in Urban Conservation, 8, 31
  31. Nordin, S. (2019). Durable Temporality-design and temporality in modular architecture
  32. Powers, M. (2007). Toward a discipline-dependent scholarship. Journal of Architectural Education, 61(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00122.x
  33. Redyantanu, B. P. (2023). Fleksibilitas Dan Adaptabilitas Ruang DomestikBerbasis Arsitektur Keseharian. Idealog: Ide Dan Dialog Desain Indonesia, 8(1), 14. http://journals.telkomuniversity.ac.id/idealog/article/view/5455
  34. Redyantanu, B. P., & Damayanti, R. (2017). TEMPORALITY IN A DISCUSSION OF SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 44(2), 163–170
  35. Santoso, I., Setioko, B., & Pandelaki, E. E. (2021). The changing aspects of function and meaning of space in Alun-Alun Kidul Keraton Surakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 780(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/780/1/012075
  36. Schön. (1983). The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action. Basic Books
  37. Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and Placelessness, Edward Relph. Key Texts in Human Geography, 43, 51
  38. Setiawan, H. (2020). DAYA TARIK PENGUNJUNG TERHADAP PERMAINAN DI ALUN-ALUN KIDUL YOGYAKARTA BERDASARKAN KATEGORI USIA. Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta
  39. Silva, M. F. (2020). Another way of living: The Prefabrication and modularity toward circularity in the architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), 42048
  40. Simonsen, K. (2017). Spatiality, Temporality and the Construction of the City. In Space Odysseys (pp. 43–61). Routledge
  41. Soja, E. W. (1998). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other Real-and-Imagined Places. Capital & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981689806400112
  42. Spiller, N. (2020). Cyberspace: Speculative Futures of the Recent Past. Architectural Design, 90(3), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2579
  43. Stefanovic, I. L. (1994). Temporality and architecture: A phenomenological reading of built form. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 211–225
  44. Till, J. (2012). Is doing architecture doing research? 4IAU 4aJornadas Internacionales Sobre Investigación En Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Valencia, 2011
  45. Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and disjunction. MIT press
  46. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. U of Minnesota Press
  47. Vandenbroucke, M., De Temmerman, N., Paduart, A., & Debacker, W. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles of implementing transformable architecture. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Building, Guimarães, Portugal, 30
  48. Verbeke, J. (2013). This is research by design. In Design research in architecture (pp. 137–160). Routledge
  49. Wallance, D. (2021). The future of modular architecture. Routledge
  50. Wells, L. (2007). Curatorial strategy as critical intervention: the genesis of facing east. Issues in Curating Contemporary Art and Performance, 28–43
  51. Wunderlich, F. M. (2013). Place-Temporality and Urban Place-Rhythms in Urban Analysis and Design: An Aesthetic Akin to Music. Journal of Urban Design, 18(3), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.772882

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-05-28 06:37:30

No citation recorded.