skip to main content

EFL Student Writers‘ Engagement Strategies in Technology-Mediated Communication

*Dian Inayati orcid  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The pivotal role of readers/audience in helping shape students’ writing has led to attempts to engage them in their composition. This reader awareness is further enhanced with the integration of Web 2.0 technology, say blogs, into writing pedagogy. This study aims to investigate the engagement strategies EFL writers employ in their blogs, and the readers’ responses toward the strategies. In this content analysis study, twenty-seven learning English blog entries retrieved from three student bloggers were analyzed using Hyland’s (2005) and Myers’ (2010) engagement strategies. The findings reveal the student bloggers’ use of almost all the eleven engagement strategies proposed in the model albeit the extent of which varied depending on the type of the blog post, their personal background, and writing purposes. The use of such strategies as “Pronoun” and “Image” drew numerous comments from readers on the blogs, implying a strong sense of readership. It is thus recommended for EFL writing teachers to introduce varieties of engagement strategies within digitally-mediated writing environments to their students to enhance reader/writer interactions.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords:  EFL writing; Learning blog; Engagement strategies; Technology-mediated communication

Article Metrics:

  1. Alm, A. (2009). Blogging for self-determination with EFL learner journals. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning (pp. 202–222). IGI Global
  2. Angelaina, S., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2012). Analysing students’ engagement and learning presence in an educational blog community. Educational Media International, 49(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.738012
  3. Bloch, J., & Crosby, C. (2009). Blogging and academic writing development. In F. Zhang & B. Barber (Eds.), Computer-Enhanced Language Acquisition and Learning (pp. 36–47). IGI Global
  4. Campbell, P. (2003). Weblogs for use with ESL classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2)
  5. Chandrasegaran, A., & Kong, K. (2006). Stance-taking and stance-support in students’ online forum discussion. Linguistics and Education, 17, 374–390
  6. Chapman, C., & Scott, P. (2008). Emerging communities at BBC learning English. TESL-EJ, 11, 1–11
  7. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27
  8. Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Adventures in the blogsphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1)
  9. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  10. Fellner, T., & Apple, M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 15–26
  11. Ferry, C. (2009). Online peer review to promote reader-writer interaction. HPU TESL Working Paper Series, 7(1), 2–13
  12. Giltrow, J., & Stein, D. (2009). Genres in the internet: Innovation, evolution, and genre theory. In J. Giltrow & D. Stein (Eds.), Genres in the Internet. John Benjamins Publishing Co
  13. Godwin-Jones, R. (2008). Emerging technologies web-writing 2.0: Enabling, documenting, and assessing writing online. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 7–13
  14. Gönen, S. İ. K. (2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: Reflections from pre-service teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974
  15. Gonzales, R. D. L. C. (2010). Motivational orientation in foreign language learning: The case of Filipino foreign language learners. TESOL Journal, 3, 3–28
  16. Hansen, H. E. (2016). The Impact of Blog-Style Writing on Student Learning Outcomes: A Pilot Study. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1060887
  17. Herring, S., Scheidt, L., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. the 37th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37), Los Alamitos
  18. Huang, H. C. (2016). Students and the teacher’s perceptions on incorporating the blog task and peer feedback into EFL writing classes through blogs. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 38–47
  19. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192
  20. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on EFL writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 1–19). Cambridge University Press
  21. Inayati, D., & Emaliana, I. (2017). The relationship among pre-service EFL teachers’ beliefs about language learning, pedagogical beliefs, and beliefs about ICT integration. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(1), 83–99
  22. Johnson, A. (2004). Creating a writing course utilizing class and student blogs. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(8)
  23. Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In R. Kern & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 1–19). Cambridge University Press
  24. Kung, F.-W. (2018). Assessing an innovative advanced academic writing course through blog-assisted language learning: Issues and resolutions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108213
  25. Lamb, M., & Arisandy, F. E. (2020). The impact of online use of English on motivation to learn. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1545670
  26. Lazaraton, A. (2009). Discourse analysis. In J. Heigham & R. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan
  27. Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. The University of Michigan Press
  28. Marlow, C. (2006). Linking without thinking: Weblogs, readership and online social capital formation. International Communication Association Conference, Dresden, Germany. International Communication Association Conference
  29. Myers, G. (2010). The discourse of blogs and wikis. Continuum
  30. Noels, K., Pelletier, L., Clement, R., & Vallerand, R. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85
  31. Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis. Continuum
  32. Paul, J. Z., & Friginal, E. (2019). The effects of symmetric and asymmetric social networks on second language communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527364
  33. Penrod, D. (2007). Using blogs to enhance literacy. Rowman & Littlefield Education
  34. Pham, V. P. H., & Usaha, S. (2016). Blog-based peer response for L2 writing revision. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 1–25
  35. Ware, P. (2004). Confidence and competition online: ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom. Computers and Composition, 21, 451–486
  36. Warschauer, M. (2006). On-line communication. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press
  37. Wu, C. (2006). Blogs in TEFL: a new promising vehicle. US-China Education Review, 3(5), 69–74
  38. Wu, W. (2006). The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers. Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature, 3, 125–139
  39. Xu, Z., Banerjee, M., Ramirez, G., Zhu, G., & Wijekumar, K. (Kay). (2019). The effectiveness of educational technology applications on adult English language learners’ writing quality: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1–2), 132–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1501069

Last update: 2021-07-27 00:35:05

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-07-27 00:35:05

No citation recorded.