DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v14i1.74-90

Metadiscourse Analysis of Arabic Debate Argumentation at ISDC (International School Debating Championship)

Departement of Arabic Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Published: 20 Apr 2024.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Arabic debate is an argumentative discourse with exceptional skills in conveying it; therefore, debaters are required not only to be proficient in the material but must also be able to use extraordinary rhetoric to satisfy the audience. This research analyzes the types and functions of Hyland metadiscourse markers used by debaters from the Indonesian team and the Singapore team in international inter-school debate events (ISDC) in Doha, Qatar. This research method uses descriptive qualitative research and a content analysis research design. Data collection techniques include listening and note-taking. At the data analysis stage, researchers carry out steps: collecting, reducing, presenting, and drawing conclusions. This research shows that all Indonesian and Singapore team debaters used all subcategories of Hyland's interactive and interactional metadiscourse marker categories. Metadiscourse is vital to conveying an idea or discourse so that the reader and audience can express and understand the concept well.

 

 
Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Arabic debate; Argumentation; Analysis; Metadiscourse;Hyland
Funding: -

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Most cited articles
KOMPONEN MAKNA UNGKAPAN METAFORIS DALAM PILEG 2009 DALAM WACANA SURAT PEMBACA DI HARIAN SUARA MERDEKA Frontmatter Illocution on Speech Acts of Foreign Students in Indonesian Learning The Effectiveness of TPR (Total Physical Response) Method in English Vocabulary Mastery of Elementary School Children The Effect of Study Abroad on Grammatical Accuracy of Indonesian Students’ Oral and Written Performance More cited articles
  1. Aini, N., & Ekawati, R. (2022). Metadiscourse Markers in CNN Health News Articles. SUAR BETANG, 17(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v17i1.329
  2. Akoto, O. Y. (2020). Metadiscourse within a discipline: A study of introduction and literature review chapters of sociology masters’ theses. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28588
  3. Al Farisi, M. Z., Tantowi, Y. A., & Nurmala, M. (2023). Language, Culture, and Translation. Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah Internasional Bahasa Arab, 14(1), 1093–1102
  4. Al Hajuri, S. B. I. (2019). The use of debate in teaching Arabic to non-native speakers: A descriptive and analytical study. Al-Tajdid Is a Biannual Peer-Reviewed Intellectual Journal Published by the International Islamic University Malaysia, 23(46), 99–147
  5. Al Khodari, F. T., & Habil, H. (2021). Metadiscourse Markers in Dr. Zakir Naik’s Persuasive Discourse. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 21(4), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-18
  6. AlJazrawi, D. A., & AlJazrawi, Z. A. (2019). The Use of Meta-discourse An Analysis of Interactive and Interactional Markers in English Short Stories as a Type of Literary Genre. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(3), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.3p.66
  7. Anuarsham, A. H., Rahmat, N. H., & Khamsah, M. A. N. (2020). Metadiscourse Analysis of An Online Entertainment Article. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v3i1.187
  8. Asadi, J., Aliasin, S. H., & MoradJoz, R. (2023). A Study of the Research Article Discussion Section Written by Native Authors: Hyland’s 2005) Metadiscourse Model in Focus. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2023.1976435.1428
  9. Aszeli, N. A., Jamil, D. A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2021). A Study of Interactional Metadiscourse On News Article On The Impact of Covid-19 On Education. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v4i4.238
  10. Azijah, D. P., & Gulö, I. (2020). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers In Jacinda Ardern Speech at Christchurch Memorial. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v1i2.594
  11. Bal Gezegi̇N, B., & Bas, M. (2020). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A comparison of research articles and book reviews. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710204
  12. Balog, P. (2022). Analysis of Queen Elizabeth II’s Coronavirus Speech Using Hyland’s Metadiscourse Theory. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(1)
  13. Çapar, M., & Turan, Ü. D. (2020). Interactional Metadiscourse in Research Articles Written by Turkish and Native Speakers. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 10(1), 324–358. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.682042
  14. Debate, Q. (Director). (2023). الجولة الثالثة—فريق اندونيسيا ضد فريق سنغافورة. https://youtu.be/gA6qbW-yxQs?si=oMHEFs1LC7IrwA_M
  15. Dichoso, D. B. (2022). Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in Computer- Mediated British Parliamentary Debate: A Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Multidiciplinary Studies, 2(7), 302–3014
  16. Effendi, I. S., & Wahyudi, R. (2023). The Exploration of Metadiscourse Markers in The National University Debating Championship (NUDC) and Its Pedagogical Implications. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 11(2), 217–237
  17. Farghal, M., & Kalakh. (2020). Engagement in Translation: Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in American Presidential Debates. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 12(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.12.1.7
  18. Geng, H., & Wei, H. (2023). Metadiscourse Markers in Abstracts of Linguistics and Literature Research Articles from Scopus-Indexed Journals. Journal of Modern Languages, 33(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.22452/jml.vol33no1.2
  19. Hu Xue-chen & Liu Ying-liang. (2022). A Corpus-based Study of Interactional Metadiscourse in Dissertation Abstracts. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2022.03.009
  20. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continum
  21. Ilie, C. (2003). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), 71–95
  22. Istiani, R., & Puspita, D. (2020). Interactional Metadiscourse used in Bloomberg International Debate. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v1i1.160
  23. Koutchadé, I. S. (2021). Analysing Metadiscourse Markers in Two Online Newspapers’ Editorials on Covid-19. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8(4), 76–88
  24. Kuswoyo, H., & Siregar, R. A. (2019). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers as Persuasive Strategies in Oral Business Presentation. Lingua Cultura, 13(4), 297. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i4.5882
  25. Mat Zali, M., Mohamad, R., Setia, R., Raja Baniamin, R. M., & Mohd Razlan, R. (2021). Comparisons of Interactive and Interactional Metadiscourse among Undergraduates. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11946
  26. Nugrahani, V. E., & Bram, B. (2020). Metadiscourse Markers in Scientific Journal Articles. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v6i1.1528
  27. Park, H. I., & Lee, S. (2022). Interactional Metadiscourse in English Teaching Articles: A Diachronic Perspective (1980-2021). English Teaching, 77(2), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.77.2.202206.3
  28. Rahimi Rad, M. (2020). Iranian EFL Learners` Use of Metadiscourse Markers in Argumentative Writing. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(3), 1353–1362. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i3.1184
  29. Wati, A. T., & Maula, N. D. (2021). Correlation Between Vocabulary Mastery and Arabic Debate Ability: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Social, Humanity, and Education (ICoSIHESS 2020), 518, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.129
  30. Xu, Q., Chen, S., Wang, J., & Suhadolc, S. (2021). Characteristics and Effectiveness of Teacher Feedback on Online Business English Oral Presentations. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00595-5
  31. Zaki, M. (2022). The metadiscourse of Arabic academic abstracts: A corpus-based study. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 10(2), 113–146. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.10.02.06
  32. Zal, N., & Moini, M. R. (2021). The Use of Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in English Book Reviews Across Disciplines. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1203.18
  33. Zali, M. M., Mohamad, R., Setia, R., Baniamin, R. M. R., & Razlan, R. M. (2020). Interactional Metadiscourse Analysis of Evaluative Essays. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5, 120–129

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-14 01:50:41

No citation recorded.