skip to main content

Blaming, Resisting, and Reframing Authority: A Pragmatic Critical Discourse Analysis of Instagram Narratives during Flood Disasters in Sumatra

1Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

2Universitas Ekasakti, Indonesia

3Universitas Metamedia, Indonesia

Received: 21 Apr 2026; Revised: 13 May 2026; Accepted: 21 May 2026; Available online: 25 May 2026; Published: 25 Apr 2026.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Public discourse on social media has given rise to various narratives that often spark debate and influence public perceptions of information. This study aims to examine pragmatic patterns and discursive constructions in social media narratives related to disaster events, with a focus on how users construct, challenge, and reframe authority. This study employs an interpretive qualitative approach using Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), which encompasses text analysis, discursive practices, and social practices. Data in the form of Instagram posts were analyzed step-by-step through the identification of linguistic elements, patterns of discourse production and distribution, and their connection to the broader social context. A pragmatic approach was used to identify speech acts, implicatures, and attitude constructions in digital discourse. The research findings indicate that disaster discourse is constructed through evaluative lexical strategies, irony, metaphors, and visual reinforcement that represent ecological crises and social inequalities. Audience responses exhibit dominant patterns of blaming, resisting, and reframing, which consistently appear in comments, likes, and content shares. These findings confirm that social media functions as a discursive arena that not only represents the reality of disasters but also shapes collective criticism of policies, power, and environmental management.

Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA); Pragmatic Analysis; Social Media Discourse; Disaster Narratives; • Authority Construction

Article Metrics:

  1. Ardalan, A., & Affun-Adegbulu, C. (2024). Introduction to natural disasters. In G. R. Ciottone (Ed.), Ciottone’s disaster medicine (3rd ed., pp. 594–597). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-80932-0.00094-X
  2. Agrawal, N. (2018). Defining natural hazards – large scale hazards. Dalam buku Natural Disasters and Risk Management in Canada (hlm. 1–40). Springer. PMCID: PMC7120322. Diakses dari https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120322/
  3. Antara News. (2025). Korban meninggal akibat banjir di Sumatera Barat terus bertambah. Retrieved March 26, 2026, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/5319232/polda-sumbar-identifikasi-korban-meninggal-akibat-banjir-berlanjut
  4. Afrianto, Rido, A., Pranoto, B. E., Puspita, D., Kuswoyo, H., Gulo, I., & Suprayogi. (2025). Discourse studies: Approaches to discourse analysis. Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia. https://teknokrat.ac.id
  5. BAZNAS Sumatera Barat. (2024). Sitrep IV bencana banjir dan banjir bandang serta longsor di wilayah Sumatera Barat. Retrieved March 26, 2026, from https://sumbar.baznas.go.id/berita/news-show/sitrep-iv-bencana-banjir-dan-banjir-bandang-serta-longsor-di-wilayah-sumatera-barat/7008
  6. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2024). Laporan kejadian bencana banjir dan longsor di wilayah Sumatra Barat tahun 2024. https://bnpb.go.id
  7. Bromhead, H. (2021). Disaster linguistics, climate change semantics and public discourse studies: A semantically enhanced discourse study of 2011 Queensland Floods. Language Sciences, 85, 101381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381
  8. Costa, R. O. (2025). Crisis communication and risk perception: Reputation risk management strategies in the social media era. Media and Society Journal. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v3i4.473
  9. Dandapala. (2025). Status bencana nasional: Tameng impunitas atau pintu masuk penegakan hukum lingkungan? https://www.dandapala.com/opini/detail/status-bencana-nasional-tameng-impunitas-atau-pintu-masuk-penegakan-hukum-lingkungan
  10. Detik News. (2025). Kriteria penetapan status bencana nasional di Indonesia dan riwayatnya. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-8235775/kriteria-penetapan-status-bencana-nasional-di-indonesia-dan-riwayatnya
  11. Erokhin, D., & Komendantova, N. (2024). Social media data for disaster risk management and research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 114, 104980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104980
  12. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London and New York: Longman
  13. Gelgel, R. A., Pramudita, M. A., & Silalahi, J. E. (2024). Penggunaan media sosial Instagram dalam komunikasi bencana kesiapsiagaan erupsi Gunung Merapi. COMMENTATE: Journal of Communication Management, 4(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.37535/103004220235
  14. Gokcimen, T., & Das, B. (2024). Exploring climate change discourse on social media and blogs using a topic modeling analysis. Heliyon, Volume 10, Issue 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32464
  15. Guidry, J. P. D., Jin, Y., Orr, C. A., Messner, M., & Meganck, S. (2017). Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: How health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.009
  16. Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Hode, M. G., Halliwell, M. R., McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., & Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092
  17. Ismail, I., & Suldani, M. R. Y. (2024). Komunikasi bencana dalam penanganan banjir melalui media sosial oleh Diskominfo dan BPBD Kota Makassar. Studia Komunika: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.47995/jik.v7i1.190
  18. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press
  19. Maretyana, R. N., & Hidayat, M. (2025). Analisis komunikasi bencana melalui media sosial Instagram @bnpb_indonesia dalam membangun budaya sadar bencana. Warta Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.25008/wartaiski.v8i2.387
  20. Martutik, Santoso, A., Rani, A., Prastio, B., & Maulidina, A. (2024). Exploring flaming in the discourse of negative judgment: Invoked strategies used by Indonesian netizens in Instagram comments. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2333601. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2333601
  21. Mızrak, S. (2024). Public’s social media use during the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on 6 February 2023. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 108, 104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104541
  22. Nugroho, Y., Putri, D. A., & Laksmi, S. (2020). Mapping the landscape of the media industry in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(2), 1–15
  23. Katadata. (2025). Sebaran korban meninggal karena banjir dan longsor di Sumatera Barat. Retrieved March 26, 2026, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/lingkungan/statistik/69377eed5aac8/sebaran-korban-meninggal-karena-banjir-dan-longsor-di-sumatera-barat-9-desember-2025
  24. Kabar Bursa. (2025). Kerugian ekonomi akibat banjir dan longsor di Sumatera Barat. Retrieved March 26, 2026, from https://www.kabarbursa.com/makro/kerugian-banjir-dan-longsor-di-sumbar-bisa-tembus-lebih-dari-rp485-miliar
  25. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Pasca banjir Sumbar catat kasus demam tertinggi di Sumatera. Retrieved March 26, 2026, from https://kemkes.go.id/id/pasca-banjir-sumbar-catat-kasus-demam-tertinggi-di-sumatera
  26. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge
  27. Kaoem Telapak. (2024). Hancur di hulu, banjir di hilir: Deforestasi dan bencana ekologis di Sumatera. https://kaoemtelapak.org/id/hancur-di-hulu-banjir-di-hilir-deforestasi-dan-bencana-ekologis-di-sumatera
  28. Pemerintah Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. (2025). Bagaimana pemerintah menentukan status bencana nasional. https://pesisirselatankab.go.id/rberita/detail/bagaimana-pemerintah-menentukan-status-bencana-nasional
  29. Pratama, H., & Mustofa, M. (2025). The Muria Strait Narrative in Shaping Public Perception of the Great Demak Flood of March 2024: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Political Issues, 7(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.33019/jpi.v7i1.282
  30. Rabbani, K., & Mehmood, M. A. (2024). Speech act of flaming: A pragmatic analysis of Twitter trolling in Pakistan. Discourse & Society, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231222589
  31. Simon, T., Goldberg, A., & Adini, B. (2015). Socializing in emergencies—A review of the use of social media in emergency situations. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.07.001
  32. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics (Learning about Language). London and New York: Longman
  33. Twigg, J. (2004). Disaster risk reduction: Mitigation and preparedness in development and emergency programming (Good Practice Review No. 9). London: Humanitarian Practice Network, Overseas Development Institute. https://share.google/2A8WqO1EU7wTo5uhs
  34. Universitas Gadjah Mada. (2024). Banjir bandang Sumatra: Akibat kerusakan ekosistem hulu DAS. Retrieved March 26, 2026, from https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/bencana-banjir-bandang-sumatra-pakar-ugm-sebut-akibat-kerusakan-ekosistem-hutan-di-hulu-das/
  35. Veil, S. R., Buehner, T., & Palenchar, M. J. (2011). A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x
  36. Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3
  38. Widyastuti, D. A. R. (2021). Using new media and social media in disaster communication. Jurnal Komunikator, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.12074
  39. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203974575
  40. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284725923_Methods_of_Critical_Discourse_Studies_3rd_edition
  41. Zein MRA, Fadillah KL, Febriani N, Nasrullah R, Khang NT. Social media use for climate change campaign among Indonesian millennials. PRofesi Humas. 2024;8(2):168–194. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v8i2.50167

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-05-25 13:02:34

No citation recorded.