1Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
2Universitas Ekasakti, Indonesia
3Universitas Metamedia, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{PAROLE83663, author = {Herlin Triana and Vivi Indriyani and Amelia Astuti and Ratih Purwasih}, title = {Blaming, Resisting, and Reframing Authority: A Pragmatic Critical Discourse Analysis of Instagram Narratives during Flood Disasters in Sumatra}, journal = {PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education}, volume = {16}, number = {1}, year = {2026}, keywords = {Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA); Pragmatic Analysis; Social Media Discourse; Disaster Narratives; • Authority Construction}, abstract = { Public discourse on social media has given rise to various narratives that often spark debate and influence public perceptions of information. This study aims to examine pragmatic patterns and discursive constructions in social media narratives related to disaster events, with a focus on how users construct, challenge, and reframe authority. This study employs an interpretive qualitative approach using Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), which encompasses text analysis, discursive practices, and social practices. Data in the form of Instagram posts were analyzed step-by-step through the identification of linguistic elements, patterns of discourse production and distribution, and their connection to the broader social context. A pragmatic approach was used to identify speech acts, implicatures, and attitude constructions in digital discourse. The research findings indicate that disaster discourse is constructed through evaluative lexical strategies, irony, metaphors, and visual reinforcement that represent ecological crises and social inequalities. Audience responses exhibit dominant patterns of blaming, resisting, and reframing, which consistently appear in comments, likes, and content shares. These findings confirm that social media functions as a discursive arena that not only represents the reality of disasters but also shapes collective criticism of policies, power, and environmental management. }, issn = {23380683}, pages = {63--78} doi = {10.14710/parole.v16i1.63-78}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/parole/article/view/83663} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Public discourse on social media has given rise to various narratives that often spark debate and influence public perceptions of information. This study aims to examine pragmatic patterns and discursive constructions in social media narratives related to disaster events, with a focus on how users construct, challenge, and reframe authority. This study employs an interpretive qualitative approach using Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), which encompasses text analysis, discursive practices, and social practices. Data in the form of Instagram posts were analyzed step-by-step through the identification of linguistic elements, patterns of discourse production and distribution, and their connection to the broader social context. A pragmatic approach was used to identify speech acts, implicatures, and attitude constructions in digital discourse. The research findings indicate that disaster discourse is constructed through evaluative lexical strategies, irony, metaphors, and visual reinforcement that represent ecological crises and social inequalities. Audience responses exhibit dominant patterns of blaming, resisting, and reframing, which consistently appear in comments, likes, and content shares. These findings confirm that social media functions as a discursive arena that not only represents the reality of disasters but also shapes collective criticism of policies, power, and environmental management.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-07-13 13:54:21
Beginning with Volume 16, Number 2 (2026), authors who publish in Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education retain full copyright ownership of their work (Copyright © Author). In line with the journal’s commitment to open access, all articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
For articles published prior to Volume 16, Number 2 (2026), copyright was held by the publisher, Universitas Diponegoro. To strengthen the journal’s commitment to open access, the copyright policy has been revised to allow authors to retain full copyright ownership of their published works. Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license, readers and third parties are free to share, adapt, and build upon the published content for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors and source, and that any derivative works are distributed under the same license.
View My Stats