DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v19i4.49144

Assessment of The Potential Utilization of Urban Forests as A Public Recreational Area (Case Study in Kibitay Urban Forest, Sukabumi City)

*Wida Oktavia Suciyani  -  Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
Fadhilah Noordya Utami  -  Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
Krisna Yudha Bakhti  -  Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
Sherly Raka Siwi Putri  -  Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The urban forest can provide social benefits as a public recreation area. Efforts to utilize the urban forest as a recreational area need to be carefully planned, so it is necessary to assess the recreational potential of the urban forest to produce effective planning. This study aims to reveal in depth the potential utilization of urban forest assets as a public recreation area based on the determination of outdoor recreation potential. The study method used is descriptive qualitative and quantitative with data collection techniques, including observation, interviews, and documentation studies. Based on the results of the assessment, it is revealed that the recreational potential of the Kibitay Urban Forest assets is included in the high recreational potential category by 64% because it has sufficient landscape feature value and high climate value and accessibility. This shows that the Kibitay Urban Forest has the potential to be used as a public recreation area, although recreational facilities are not fully adequate. Future research can consider conducting asset planning for Kibitay Urban Forest facilities in Sukabumi City as a public recreation area.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Potential Assessment, Urban Forest, Public Recreation, Determination of Outdoor Recreation Potential

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Pola Spasial Perubahan Tutupan Lahan/Penggunaan Lahan Menggunakan Google Earth Engine di Kabupaten Majalengka Assessment of The Potential Utilization of Urban Forests as A Public Recreational Area (Case Study in Kibitay Urban Forest, Sukabumi City) Memodelkan Pemanfaatan Ruang Mempergunakan Perspektif Konfigurasi Ruang di Kota Blitar More recent articles
Most cited articles
Karakteristik Migrasi dan Dampaknya terhadap Pengembangan Pedesaan Kecamatan Kedungjati, Kabupaten Grobogan Keberlanjutan Pengelolaan Sampah Domestik di Kampung Menoreh, Kelurahan Sampangan, Semarang Permodelan Tsunami dan Implikasinya Terhadap Mitigasi Bencana di Kota Palu Pengembangan Sarana dan Prasarana untuk Mendukung Pariwisata Pantai yang Berkelanjutan (Studi Kasus: Kawasan Pesisir Pantai Wonokerto Kabupaten Pekalongan) Hubungan Karakteristik Sosial Ekonomi dengan Tingkat Kepuasan Bermukim Pemilik Rumah Sederhana di Perumahan Tamansari Bukit Mutiara Kota Balikpapan More cited articles
  1. ´Switalska, S. W.-, Zajadacz, A., & Lubarska, A. (2021). Recreation and Therapy in Urban Forests—The Potential Use of Sensory Garden Solutions. Forests, 12(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101402
  2. Bachtiar, J. C. U., & Kusuma, H. E. (2019). Pengelompokan Pengunjung Berdasarkan Durasi Kunjungan dan Karakteristik Taman: Relaksasi, Pelarian, dan Penikmat. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 11(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.11.1.2019.11-16
  3. Beljai, M. (2014). Konsep Penataan Lanskap Untuk Wisata Alam Sorong (Landscape Arrangement Concept for Natural Tourism at Sorong Natural Tourism Park). Journal of People and Environment, 21(3), 356–365
  4. Braquinho, C., Cvejić, R., Eler, K., Gonzales, P., Haase, D., R.Hansen, Kabisch, N., Rall, E. L., Niemela, J., Pauleit, S., Pintar, M., Lafortezza, R., Santos, A., Strohbach, M., Vierikko, K., & Železnikar, Š. (2017). A Typology of Urban Green Spaces, Ecosystem Services Provisioning Services and Demands (Vol. 10)
  5. Brunetta, G., & Voghera, A. (2008). Evaluating Landscape for Shared Values: Tools, Principles, and Methods. Landscape Research, 33(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701773839
  6. Çetin, M., & Sevik, H. (2015). Evaluating the Recreation Potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5064-7
  7. Gidlow, C. J., Ellis, N. J., & Bostock, S. (2012). Development of the Neighbourhood Green Space Tool (NGST). Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.007
  8. Hakim, R., & Utomo, H. (2008). Komponen Perancangan Arsitektur Lansekap: Prinsip-Unsur dan Aplikasi Desain. Bumi Aksara
  9. Heer, C., Rusterholz, H. P., & Baur, B. (2003). Forest Perception and Knowledge of Hikers and Mountain Bikers in Two Different Areas in Northwestern Switzerland. Environmental Management, 31(6), 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-3002-x
  10. Imansari, N., & Khadiyanta, P. (2015). Penyediaan Hutan Kota dan Taman Kota sebagai Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) Publik Menurut Preferensi Masyarakat di Kawasan Pusat Kota Tangerang. Ruang, 1(3), 101–110. http://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/INDEX.PHP/ruang%0APenyediaan
  11. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang, 56 (2007)
  12. Kaya, L. G., & Aytekin, A. (2009). Determination of Outdoor Recreation Potential: Case of the City of Bartin and its Environs, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18(8), 1513–1524
  13. Koara, F. P., Marisa, A., & Nasution, A. D. (2023). Community Satisfaction Analysis Based on Physical Quality of Green Open Space in Takengon (Case Study: Taman Aman Dimot). Devotion Journal of Community Service, 4(5), 1133–1152. https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v4i5.470
  14. Köse, M. (2020). Factors Affecting the Planning and Management of Urban Forests: A Case Study of Istanbul. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 54(May 2019), 126739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126739
  15. Kurniastuti, A. E. (2013). Pengelolaan Hutan Kota di Jakarta (Studi Kasus Hutan Kota Srengseng di Jakarta Barat). Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota, 9(4), 439. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v9i4.6681
  16. Kusyanto, M. (2012). Kajian Hutan Kota dalam Pengembangan Kota Demak. Jurnal Unisfat, 1(1), 53–62
  17. Mahabella, L. S., Rapija, O., & Waibo, G. (2020). Analisis Nilai Indeks Suhu dan Kelembaban Ruang Terbuka Taman Rekreasi Sengkaling. Media Teknik Sipil, 18(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.22219/jmts.v18i2.15200
  18. Ouf, T. A., & Makram, A. (2018). An Approach To Design Decisions Through Site Analysis Processitle. International Journal Of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 7(9), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1407678
  19. Permata, N. D. (2019). Evaluasi Fungsi Pemanfaatan Hutan Kota sebagai Kawasan Rekreasi Masyarakat Jabodetabek. Institut Pertanian Bogor
  20. Permata, N. D., Syartinilia, ., & Munandar, A. (2019). Pemanfaatan Hutan Kota di Wilayah Jakarta Timur Sebagai Kawasan Rekreasi Masyarakat Kota. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 10(2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.2018.10.2.47-55
  21. Samsoedin, I., & Waryono, T. (2010). Hutan Kota dan Keanekaragaman Jenis Pohon di Jabodetabek. Yayasan Keanekaragaman Hayati (KEHATI)
  22. Samsudi. (2010). Ruang Terbuka Hijau Kebutuhan Tata Ruang Perkotaan Kota Surakarta. Journal of Rural and Development, Vol. 1(No. 1), Hal. 11-19
  23. Sudjana. (2002). Metode Statistika. Tarsito
  24. Thompson, C. W. (2002). Urban Open Space in the 21st Century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00059-2
  25. Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003). A Monitoring Tool for the Provision of Accessible and Attractive Urban Green Spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5
  26. Warpani, S. P. (2007). Parawisata Dalam Tata Ruang Wilayah. ITB Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-25 19:53:45

No citation recorded.