DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpwk.v22i3.82621

Economic Drivers and the Dynamics of Inclusive and Sustainable Urbanization: An Assessment of Medan with Comparative Insights from Bangkok and Marseille

*I Gede Wyana Lokantara orcid scopus  -  Architecture Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, State University of Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia
Sri Zahwa Aulia  -  Architecture Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, State University of Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia
Siti Zulfa Yuzni orcid scopus  -  Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Urbanization can drive economic growth but also increases spatial pressure, environmental risks, and disparities in access to urban services. This research examines how economic structure, investment orientation, and governance capacity shape inclusive and sustainable urbanization in Medan, using Bangkok and Marseille as comparative cases. The study employs a mixed-methods comparative approach, integrating a weighted assessment of ten indicators across governance, investment, economic drivers, and inclusive urbanization, alongside document analysis, GIS-based land-use analysis, and VOSviewer keyword mapping from Scopus and Web of Science. Findings indicate that Medan achieved 5.07% economic growth in 2024, primarily driven by trade, construction, manufacturing, and service sectors. However, the composite assessment reached only 3.00, reflecting challenges within Medan’s rapidly evolving urban and environmental spatial structure. Governance and inclusive urbanization scored 2.67 and 2.33, respectively, while investment and economic drivers attained 3.50. Settlement land increased from 18,205.50 ha in 2011 to 20,705.31 ha in 2025, demonstrating significant spatial transformation. Comparative literature analysis shows a greater focus on future mobility and environmental adaptation in Bangkok, whereas research on Marseille emphasizes governance, social inclusion, and sustainability. Overall, the results suggest that economic growth alone is insufficient for achieving inclusive and sustainable urbanization; enhanced green investment, affordable mobility, integrated governance, and spatial coordination are essential.

Fulltext Email colleagues
Keywords: Economic Drivers; Governance; Green Investment; Inclusive Urbanization; Sustainable Urbanization

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
MODEL PEMETAAN RISIKO KEKERINGAN DI KABUPATEN BIMA, NUSA TENGGARA BARAT Preferensi Pengunjung Terhadap Daya Tarik Objek Wisata Teluk Palu di Kota Palu Permodelan Tsunami dan Implikasinya Terhadap Mitigasi Bencana di Kota Palu Pemodelan Spasial Resiko Kebakaran Hutan (Studi Kasus Provinsi Jambi, Sumatera) Evaluasi Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Kecamatan di Daerah Aliran Sungai Cisadane Kabupaten Bogor More cited articles
  1. Acuto, M., Parnell, S., & Seto, K. C. (2018). Building A Global Urban Science. Nature Sustainability, 1(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0013-9
  2. Adeola, O., Aniramu, O., Adenegan, O., & Orimoogunje, O. (2025). Land use change, planning instruments, and sustainable strategies for urban flood risk management in Ibadan, Nigeria. Discover Environment, 3(1), Article 284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-025-00478-2
  3. Avashia, V., & Garg, A. (2020). Implications of land use transitions and climate change on local flooding in urban areas: An assessment of 42 Indian cities. Land Use Policy, 95, 104571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104571
  4. Baloch, R. M., Maesano, C. N., Christoffersen, J., Banerjee, S., Gabriel, M., Csobod, É., de Oliveira Fernandes, E., & Annesi-Maesano, I. (2020). Indoor air pollution, physical and comfort parameters related to schoolchildren's health: Data from the European SINPHONIE study. Science of the Total Environment, 739, 139870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139870
  5. Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
  6. Deveci, M., Pamučar, D., & Gokasar, I. (2021). Fuzzy Power Heronian function-based CoCoSo method for the advantage prioritization of autonomous vehicles in real-time traffic management. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102846
  7. Elmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Olsson, P., Gaffney, O., Takeuchi, K., & Folke, C. (2019). Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature Sustainability, 2(4), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
  8. Firman, T. (2009). The continuity and change in mega-urbanization in Indonesia: A survey of Jakarta–Bandung Region (JBR) development. Habitat International, 33(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.08.005
  9. Frantzeskaki, N., Loorbach, D., & Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Governing societal transitions to sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1–2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2012.044032
  10. Gullette, G., Thebpanya, P., & Singto, S. (2022). Socioeconomic and livelihood impacts within Bangkok's expanding metropolitan region. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), 808–823. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.233
  11. Güneralp, B., Reba, M., Hales, B. U., Wentz, E. A., & Seto, K. C. (2020). Trends in urban land expansion, density, and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: A global synthesis. Environmental Research Letters, 15(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6669
  12. Hopkins, K. G., Grimm, N. B., & York, A. M. (2018). Influence of governance structure on green stormwater infrastructure investment. Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.008
  13. Hudalah, D., Viantari, D., Firman, T., & Woltjer, J. (2013). Industrial Land Development and Manufacturing Deconcentration in Greater Jakarta. Urban Geography, 34 (7), 950–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.783281
  14. Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., & James, P. (2012). Simulating urban growth processes incorporating a potential model with spatial metrics. Ecological Indicators, 20, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.003
  15. Maulani, D. C., Purwaningsih, V. T., & Aida, N. (2024). The Influence of Urbanization, Population Density, and Poverty Rate on Crime in the City of Bandung. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 13(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.23960/jep.v13i2.3815
  16. Melnyk, L., Sommer, H., Kubatko, O., Rabe, M., & Fedyna, S. (2020). The economic and social drivers of renewable energy development in OECD countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.04
  17. Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. (1996). The land use–transport connection: An overview. Land Use Policy, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(95)00027-5
  18. OECD, European Union, & European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en
  19. Paskaleva, K., Evans, C.J., Martin, C., Linjordet, T., Yang, D., & Karvonen, A. (2017). Data Governance in the Sustainable Smart City. Informatics, 4(4), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4040041
  20. Schmid, E. (2024). Reassembling Marseille's mosaic: Urban planning in service of a post-World War II imagined identity. Planning Perspectives, 39(5), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2024.2371948
  21. Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083–16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109
  22. Sipayung, M. C., Sudarsono, B., & Awwaluddin, M. (2019). Analisis perubahan lahan untuk melihat arah perkembangan wilayah menggunakan sistem informasi geografis (studi kasus: Kota Medan). Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 9(1), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.14710/jgundip.2020.26201
  23. UN-Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme
  24. Xu, G., Zhou, Z., Jiao, L., & Zhao, R. (2020). Compact Urban Form and Expansion Pattern Slow Down the Decline in Urban Densities: A Global Perspective. Land Use Policy, 94, 104563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104563
  25. Yarnvudhi, A., Leksungnoen, N., Tor-Ngern, P., Premashthira, A., Thinkampheang, S., & Hermhuk, S. (2021). Evaluation of Regulating and Provisioning Services Provided by a Park Designed to Be Resilient to Climate Change in Bangkok, Thailand. Sustainability, 13(24), 13624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413624
  26. Zamyatina, N. Y., Goncharov, R., Poturaeva, A., & Pilyasov, A. (2020). The sandwich of Russian space: How different spaces differentiate themes in regional science. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 12(4), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12272

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-30 23:20:33

No citation recorded.