Comparative Analysis Between PI Conventional and Cascade Control in Heater-PFR-Series

*Dedy Kristanto scopus  -  Petroleum Engineering Department, Indonesia
Yulius Deddy Hermawan  -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Received: 16 May 2020; Published: 13 Oct 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/reaktor.20.3.129-137 View
Untitled
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (970KB)    Indexing metadata
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Reaktor
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
Abstract

The goals of this work are to compare and analyze the use of PI conventional and Cascade control configuration in heater-plug-flow-reactor-series (Heater-PFR-series) to produce benzene through the reaction of hydrodealkylation of toluene (HDA).The two control configurations were rigorously examined in UniSim dynamic simulation environment. The PI control parameters were tuned by using “autotuner” mode of UniSim. As shown in dynamic simulation study, the two control configurations with its tuning parameters gave the fast and stable responses. This study revealed that the Cascade control acted very well and its responses were better and faster than those in PI-conventional.

Keywords: cascade control; dynamic simulation; PFR; PI conventional; UniSim


Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Article Metrics:

Last update: 2021-02-25 23:50:08

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-02-25 23:50:09

No citation recorded.