DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijfst.22.3.290-299

DIFFERENCES IN PLANKTON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE BASED ON ABUNDANCE AND BIOMASS IN A TROPICAL RESERVOIR

*Syahnan Aly Lubis  -  Universitas Riau, Indonesia
Riska Aprisanti  -  Department of Aquatic Resource Management, Faculty of Aquatic and Marine Sciences, University of Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Zakiah Zakiah  -  Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Palangka Raya, Palangkaraya, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Plankton are important bioindicators for assessing the ecological condition of water bodies. However, an abundance based approach does not always reflect energy distribution within an ecosystem because small organisms can dominate numerically without contributing comparable biomass. his situation can cause ecological decoupling, a discrepancy in ecological interpretation between abundance-based and biomass-based indicators. This study aims to analyze and compare plankton community structure based on abundance and biomass and to evaluate the presence of ecological decoupling in the Koto Panjang Reservoir as a representative of a tropical reservoir influenced by hydrological dynamics and anthropogenic pressures. The study was conducted from May 2025 to April 2026 at six stations representing the riverine, transitional, and lacustrine zones. Plankton samples were analyzed using the Sedgwick–Rafter Counting Cell method, while biomass was estimated using the biovolume approach. The analysis included Bray–Curtis cluster analysis, ecological indices, Pearson correlation, linear regression, and Bland–Altman analysis. The results revealed three distinct spatial zones (riverine, transitional, and lacustrine), with plankton communities dominated by Staurastrum spp., members of the Desmidiaceae family. Phytoplankton abundance ranged from 531,000 to 1,297,000 cells L⁻¹, while phytoplankton biomass ranged from 0.19 to 0.85 mg L⁻¹. Abundance-based indices showed higher Shannon diversity values (2.74–2.97) compared to biomass-based indices (0.54–0.66). The relationship between the two approaches was relatively weak (r = 0.41–0.48; R² = 0.17–0.23 indicating differences in how community structure is represented. Pearson correlation analysis, linear regression, and Bland–Altman plots revealed a weak relationship and low agreement between the two approaches, confirming ecological decoupling. These findings suggest that integrating abundance- and biomass-based indicators is necessary to make assessments of the ecological condition of tropical reservoirs more comprehensive and representative of community structure and energy distribution within the ecosystem.
Fulltext Email colleagues
Keywords: Biomass; Decoupling; Abundance; Plankton; Tropical Reservoir; Spatial Zoning
Funding: DPPM KEMDIKTISAINTEK

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Aplikasi Teknologi Aquaponic Pada Budidaya Ikan Air Tawar Untuk Optimalisasi Kapasitas Produksi Addition of Phytase Artificial Feed to Increase Digesting, Specific Growth and Survival Rate of Nile Tilapia fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus) Field experiment of polyculture technology of tiger shrimp (P. monodon Farb.) Milkfish (Chanos chanos Forskal), and Seaweed (Gracilaria verrucosa) in Brackhiswater water pond of Borimasunggu village, Maros regency Isolasi Dan Karakterisasi Bakteri Asam Laktat Dari Usus Udang Penghasil Bakteriosin Sebagai Agen Antibakteria Pada Produk-Produk Hasil Perikanan The Effect of Leaching Times on the Gel Properties of Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Surimi More cited articles
  1. Andersen, K. H., & Visser, A. W. (2023). From Cell Size and First Principles to Structure and Function of Unicellular Plankton Communities. Progress in Oceanography, 213, 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2023.102995
  2. Association, A. P. H. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA
  3. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. The Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
  4. Choonamchai, Painter, K. J., Nazemi, A., Venkiteswaran, J. J., & Baulch, H. M. (2025). Climate variability and flow management impact phytoplankton biomass in a shallow reservoir. Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5va00094g
  5. Conde, A., Leandro, S., Maranhão, P., & Domínguez, J. (2022). Binomial transformation applied to presence-absence community data. Ecological Informatics, 70, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101753
  6. Cunha, D. G. F., Finkler, N. R., Lamparelli, M. C., Calijuri, M. do C., Dodds, W. K., & Carlson, R. E. (2021). Characterizing Trophic State in Tropical/Subtropical Reservoirs: Deviations among Indexes in the Lower Latitudes. Environmental Management, 68(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00267-021-01521-7
  7. Detmer, T., Roberts, H., Broadway, K. J., Parkos, J. I., & Wahl, D. H. (2022). Testing Theoretical Frameworks of Zooplankton Longitudinal Distribution in a Large Reservoir. Journal of Plankton Research, 44(6), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbac054
  8. Dodson, S. I., & Frey, D. G. (2001). Cladocera and Other Branchiopoda. In J. H. Thorp & A. P. Covich (Eds.), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates (2nd ed., pp. 849–913). Academic Press
  9. García-Comas, C., Sastri, A. R., Ye, L., Chang, C.-Y., Lin, F.-S., Su, M.-S., Gong, G.-C., & Hsieh, C. (2016). Prey size diversity hinders biomass trophic transfer, while predator size diversity promotes it in planktonic communities. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1824), 20152129. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.2015.2129
  10. Gjoni, V., Glazier, D. S., Wesner, J. S., Ibelings, B. W., & Thomas, M. K. (2023). Temperature, Resources, and Predation Interact to Shape Phytoplankton Size-Abundance Relationships at a Continental Scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 32(11), 2006–2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13748
  11. González-García, C., Agustí, S., Aiken, J., Bertrand, A., Bittencourt Farias, G., Bode, A., Carré, C., Gonçalves-Araujo, R., Harbour, D. S., Huete-Ortega, M., Melo, P. A. M. C., Moreno-Ostos, E., Rees, A. P., Rodríguez, J., da Silva, S., Zubkov, M., & Marañón, E. (2023). Basin-Scale Variability in Phytoplankton Size-Abundance Spectra Across the Atlantic Ocean. Progress in Oceanography, 217, 103104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2023.103104
  12. Hillebrand, H., Dürselen, C.-D., Kirschtel, D., Pollingher, U., & Zohary, T. (1999). Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology, 35(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x
  13. Iatskiu, P., Bovo-Scomparin, V. M., Segovia, B. T., Velho, L. F. M., Lemke, M. J., & Rodrigues, L. C. (2018). Variability in Mean Size of Phytoplankton in Two Floodplain Lakes of Different Climatic Regions. Hydrobiologia, 823(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10750-018-3702-0
  14. Jennings, S., Reynolds, J. D., & Mills, S. C. (1998). Life history correlates of responses to fisheries exploitation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 265, 333–339
  15. Kämpf, J., Newman, M., Doubell, M. J., Möller, L. M., Baring, R., Shute, A., & Rodriguez, A. R. (2023). A study of the seasonal and interannual variability of phytoplankton and zooplankton assemblages in a significant marine ecosystem. Oceanologia, 65(2), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2022.12.003
  16. Lubis, S. A., Pratiwi, N. T. M., & Effendi, H. (2024). Phytoplankton Abundance and Chlorophyll-a Distribution in a Reservoir. Depik Journal of Aquatic, Coastal, and Fisheries Sciences, 13(1), 118–122
  17. Marrec, P. (2024). Changes in Phytoplankton Size Structure Alter Trophic Transfer in a Temperate, Coastal Planktonic Food Web. Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10410
  18. Morozov, A., Morozov, A., Denaro, G., Spagnolo, B., Spagnolo, B., & Valenti, D. (2019). Revisiting the Role of Top-down and Bottom-up Controls in the Stabilization of Nutrient-rich Plankton Communities. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 79, 104885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.104885
  19. Oclarit, P. A. V. C., Gamiao, N. L. G., Hangad, A. M. S., Valendez, A. I. P., Mulleon, M. R. K., Madelo, S. S. B., & Alarcon, J. L. P. (2026). Gradient-Based Variation of Phytoplankton Diversity and Physicochemical Characteristics in Lumbayao Dam, Bukidnon, Philippines. Asian Journal of Geographical Research, 9(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajgr/2026/v9i1355
  20. Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., & Weedon, J. (2024). vegan: Community Ecology Package (Version 2.6-8). https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan
  21. Pearson, K. (1895). Notes on Regression and Inheritance in the Case of Two Parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58, 240–242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041
  22. Pertiwi, E. W., Masithah, E. D., & Suciyono. (2021). Assessment of Seasonal Water Quality Based on Abundance, Diversity, and Domination of Phytoplankton in Bajulmati Reservoir. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 679(1), 12064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/679/1/012064
  23. Platt, T., & Denman, K. (1977). Organization in the pelagic ecosystem. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 30, 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207865
  24. Sahoo, D., Bera, S. K., Pal, P., Tamili, D. K., Sarkar, B., Madhu, N. R., & Ghorai, S. K. (2024). Plankton act as a key indicator of the health and stability of aquatic ecosystems: A review. 257–272. https://doi.org/10.52756/boesd.2024.e03.018
  25. Sharip, Z. (2021). Changes in Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Abundance and Diversity in Macrophyte-dominated and Open Pelagic Ecosystems of Shallow Reservoirs. Inland Water Biology, 14(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082921040088
  26. Sherr, E. B., & Sherr, B. F. (2018). Preservation and Storage of Samples for Enumeration of Heterotrophic Protists (pp. 207–212). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203752746-26
  27. Siagian, M., & Simarmata, A. H. (2018). Trophic status of the lacustrine zone around the dam site of Koto Panjang Reservoir, Riau Province, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux, 11(1), 1–9
  28. Silaen, W. F., Siagian, M., & Simarmata, A. H. (2017). Concentration of BOD5 in the Lacustrine and Transition Zones of Koto Panjang Reservoir, Kampar District, Riau Province. Online Journal of the Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, University of Riau
  29. Simarmata, A. H., Majdu, S., & Clemen, S. (2013). Vertical Oxygen Profile in the Lacustrine and Transition Zones of the Koto Panjang Reservoir, Riau Province. Proceedings of the 2nd National and International Seminar on Fisheries and Marine Science
  30. Smith, W. H. (2025). Abundance/Biomass Comparison Method. In Oxford Bibliographies in Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0257
  31. Spellerberg, I. F. (2008). Shannon–Wiener Index (pp. 3249–3252). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00132-4
  32. Sugie, K., & Suzuki, K. (2015). Size of Dominant Diatom Species Can Alter Their Evenness. PLOS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131454
  33. Sun, J., & Liu, D. (2003). Geometric Models for Calculating Cell Biovolume and Surface Area for Phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 25(11), 1331–1346. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbg096
  34. Sunardi, & Oktavia, D. (2023). Plankton Community Structure and Water Conditions of the Jatigede Reservoir for the Sustainability of Fisheries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1211(1), 12014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1211/1/012014
  35. Trismara, B. K. B., Rahman, A., & Jati, O. E. (2025). Plankton Community Dynamics Based on Vertical Gradients and Transparency in Lake Rawa Pening. Acta Aquatica, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.29103/aa.v12i3.21897
  36. Wehalo, S., Simarmata, A. H., & Siagian, M. (2017). Vertical Profiles of Phosphate in the Lacustrine and Transition Zones in the Koto Panjang Reservoir, XIII Koto Kampar Districts, Kampar Regency, Riau Province. Online Journal of the Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, University of Riau
  37. Wetzel, R. G. (2001). Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. Academic Press
  38. Wulandari, D. Y., Pratiwi, N. T., Rizqi, F. N., Ayu, I. P., & Iswantari, A. (2023). Plankton Community Structure and Water Quality Assessment of the Jatigede Reservoir, Sumedang, West Java. Indonesian Journal of Biology, 19(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.47349/jbi/19012023/205

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-30 16:52:05

No citation recorded.